[NFC][flang][OpenMP] Fixes formatting issues with D110714

This NFC fixes formatting issues introduced with https://reviews.llvm.org/D110714

Reviewed By: peixin, shraiysh

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121186
This commit is contained in:
Nimish Mishra 2022-03-13 17:00:23 +05:30
parent 036088fd6e
commit e825f49b80

View File

@ -1344,7 +1344,8 @@ bool OmpStructureChecker::IsOperatorValid(const T &node, const D &variable) {
if ((exprLeft.value().source.ToString() != variableName) &&
(exprRight.value().source.ToString() != variableName)) {
context_.Say(variable.GetSource(),
"Atomic update variable '%s' not found in the RHS of the assignment statement in an ATOMIC (UPDATE) construct"_err_en_US,
"Atomic update variable '%s' not found in the RHS of the "
"assignment statement in an ATOMIC (UPDATE) construct"_err_en_US,
variableName);
}
return common::HasMember<T, AllowedBinaryOperators>;
@ -1368,7 +1369,8 @@ void OmpStructureChecker::CheckAtomicUpdateAssignmentStmt(
name->source == "iand" || name->source == "ior" ||
name->source == "ieor")) {
context_.Say(expr.source,
"Invalid intrinsic procedure name in OpenMP ATOMIC (UPDATE) statement"_err_en_US);
"Invalid intrinsic procedure name in "
"OpenMP ATOMIC (UPDATE) statement"_err_en_US);
} else if (name) {
bool foundMatch{false};
if (auto varDesignatorIndirection =
@ -1394,7 +1396,8 @@ void OmpStructureChecker::CheckAtomicUpdateAssignmentStmt(
}
if (!foundMatch) {
context_.Say(expr.source,
"Atomic update variable '%s' not found in the argument list of intrinsic procedure"_err_en_US,
"Atomic update variable '%s' not found in the "
"argument list of intrinsic procedure"_err_en_US,
var.GetSource().ToString());
}
}
@ -1417,7 +1420,8 @@ void OmpStructureChecker::CheckAtomicMemoryOrderClause(
numMemoryOrderClause++;
if (numMemoryOrderClause > 1) {
context_.Say(clause.source,
"More than one memory order clause not allowed on OpenMP Atomic construct"_err_en_US);
"More than one memory order clause not allowed on OpenMP "
"Atomic construct"_err_en_US);
return;
}
}
@ -1433,7 +1437,8 @@ void OmpStructureChecker::CheckAtomicMemoryOrderClause(
numMemoryOrderClause++;
if (numMemoryOrderClause > 1) {
context_.Say(clause.source,
"More than one memory order clause not allowed on OpenMP Atomic construct"_err_en_US);
"More than one memory order clause not allowed on "
"OpenMP Atomic construct"_err_en_US);
return;
}
}
@ -1443,7 +1448,8 @@ void OmpStructureChecker::CheckAtomicMemoryOrderClause(
numMemoryOrderClause++;
if (numMemoryOrderClause > 1) {
context_.Say(clause.source,
"More than one memory order clause not allowed on OpenMP Atomic construct"_err_en_US);
"More than one memory order clause not "
"allowed on OpenMP Atomic construct"_err_en_US);
return;
}
}