These patches do not change the functionality of the library. They
simply correct comments and documentation.
* Add a missing space in a the `FixIt` class comment
* Fix an llvm-project path in the `README.txt`
Maps to
[`CXCursor_ConceptDecl`](ee8524087c/clang/include/clang-c/Index.h (L2716)),
added in ee8524087c.
Without this I get this error on my codebase which uses C++20 concept
decls:
```
ValueError: Unknown template argument kind 604
```
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our
Python code.
Reformatting is done with `black`.
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you
have made changes to a python file, the best way to handle that
is to run git checkout --ours <yourfile> and then reformat it
with black.
If you run into any problems, post to discourse about it and
we will try to help.
RFC Thread below:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150761
The new method is a wrapper of `CXXConstructorDecl::isExplicit` and
`CXXConversionDecl::isExplicit`, allowing the user to recognize whether
the declaration pointed to by a cursor was marked with the explicit
specifier.
An export for the function, together with its documentation, was added
to "clang/include/clang-c/Index.h" with an implementation provided in
"clang/tools/libclang/CIndex.cpp".
The implementation is based on similar `clang_CXXMethod`
implementations, returning a falsy unsigned value when the cursor is not
a declaration, is not a declaration for a constructor or conversion
function or is not a relevant declaration that was marked with the
`explicit` specifier.
The new symbol was added to "clang/tools/libclang/libclang.map" to be
exported, under the LLVM16 tag.
"clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c" was modified to print a
specific tag, "(explicit)", for cursors that are recognized by
`clang_CXXMethod_isExplicit`.
Two new regression files, "explicit-constructor.cpp" and
"explicit-conversion-function.cpp", were added to "clang/test/Index", to
ensure that the behavior of the new function is correct for constructors
and conversion functions, respectively.
The "get-cursor.cpp", "index-file.cpp" and
"recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp" regression files in "clang/test/Index"
were updated as they were affected by the new "(explicit)" tag.
A binding for the new function was added to libclang's python's
bindings, in "clang/bindings/python/clang/cindex.py", as the
"is_explicit_method" method under `Cursor`.
An accompanying test was added to
"clang/bindings/python/tests/cindex/test_cursor.py", mimicking the
regression tests for the C side.
The current release note for Clang, "clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst" was
modified to report the new addition under the "libclang" section.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140756
In Gentoo, we make use of Clang's recently-enhanced config file support
and add a default include to `clang` invocations using '-include ...'.
This breaks clang-python tests like so:
```
======================================================================
ERROR: test_includes (tests.cindex.test_translation_unit.TestTranslationUnit)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/var/tmp/portage/dev-python/clang-python-15.0.6/work/clang/bindings/python/tests/cindex/test_translation_unit.py", line 145, in test_includes
eq(i[0], i[1])
File "/var/tmp/portage/dev-python/clang-python-15.0.6/work/clang/bindings/python/tests/cindex/test_translation_unit.py", line 132, in eq
self.assert_normpaths_equal(expected[0], actual.source.name)
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'name'
======================================================================
FAIL: test_inclusion_directive (tests.cindex.test_translation_unit.TestTranslationUnit)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/var/tmp/portage/dev-python/clang-python-15.0.6/work/clang/bindings/python/tests/cindex/test_translation_unit.py", line 157, in test_inclusion_directive
self.assert_normpaths_equal(i[0], i[1])
File "/var/tmp/portage/dev-python/clang-python-15.0.6/work/clang/bindings/python/tests/cindex/test_translation_unit.py", line 126, in assert_normpaths_equal
self.assertEqual(os.path.normpath(path1),
AssertionError: '/var/tmp/portage/dev-python/clang-python-1[58 chars]r1.h' != '/usr/include/gentoo/fortify.h'
- /var/tmp/portage/dev-python/clang-python-15.0.6/work/clang/bindings/python/tests/cindex/INPUTS/header1.h
+ /usr/include/gentoo/fortify.h
```
Disable using the default Clang configuration files on the system, like
we did for other tests.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/890204
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141248
The new method is a wrapper of `CXXConstructorDecl::isExplicit` and
`CXXConversionDecl::isExplicit`, allowing the user to recognize whether
the declaration pointed to by a cursor was marked with the explicit
specifier.
An export for the function, together with its documentation, was added
to "clang/include/clang-c/Index.h" with an implementation provided in
"clang/tools/libclang/CIndex.cpp".
The implementation is based on similar `clang_CXXMethod`
implementations, returning a falsy unsigned value when the cursor is not
a declaration, is not a declaration for a constructor or conversion
function or is not a relevant declaration that was marked with the
`explicit` specifier.
The new symbol was added to "clang/tools/libclang/libclang.map" to be
exported, under the LLVM16 tag.
"clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c" was modified to print a
specific tag, "(explicit)", for cursors that are recognized by
`clang_CXXMethod_isExplicit`.
Two new regression files, "explicit-constructor.cpp" and
"explicit-conversion-function.cpp", were added to "clang/test/Index", to
ensure that the behavior of the new function is correct for constructors
and conversion functions, respectively.
The "get-cursor.cpp", "index-file.cpp" and
"recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp" regression files in "clang/test/Index"
were updated as they were affected by the new "(explicit)" tag.
A binding for the new function was added to libclang's python's
bindings, in "clang/bindings/python/clang/cindex.py", as the
"is_explicit_method" method under `Cursor`.
An accompanying test was added to
"clang/bindings/python/tests/cindex/test_cursor.py", mimicking the
regression tests for the C side.
The current release note for Clang, "clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst" was
modified to report the new addition under the "libclang" section.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140756
The new method is a wrapper of `CXXMethodDecl::isMoveAssignmentOperator` and
can be used to recognized move-assignment operators in libclang.
An export for the function, together with its documentation, was added to
"clang/include/clang-c/Index.h" with an implementation provided in
"clang/tools/libclang/CIndex.cpp". The implementation was based on
similar `clang_CXXMethod.*` implementations, following the same
structure but calling `CXXMethodDecl::isMoveAssignmentOperator` for its
main logic.
The new symbol was further added to "clang/tools/libclang/libclang.map"
to be exported, under the LLVM16 tag.
"clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c" was modified to print a
specific tag, "(move-assignment operator)", for cursors that are
recognized by `clang_CXXMethod_isMoveAssignmentOperator`.
A new regression test file,
"clang/test/Index/move-assignment-operator.cpp", was added to ensure
whether the correct constructs were recognized or not by the new function.
The "clang/test/Index/get-cursor.cpp" regression test file was updated
as it was affected by the new "(move-assignment operator)" tag.
A binding for the new function was added to libclang's python's
bindings, in "clang/bindings/python/clang/cindex.py", adding a new
method for `Cursor`, `is_move_assignment_operator_method`.
An accompanying test was added to
`clang/bindings/python/tests/cindex/test_cursor.py`, testing the new
function with the same methodology as the corresponding libclang test.
The current release note, `clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst`, was modified to
report the new addition under the "libclang" section.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137246
The new method is a wrapper of `CXXMethodDecl::isCopyAssignmentOperator` and
can be used to recognized copy-assignment operators in libclang.
An export for the method, together with its documentation, was added to
"clang/include/clang-c/Index.h" with an implementation provided in
"clang/tools/libclang/CIndex.cpp". The implementation was based on
similar `clang_CXXMethod.*` implementations, following the same
structure but calling `CXXMethodDecl::isCopyAssignmentOperator` for its
main logic.
The new symbol was further added to "clang/tools/libclang/libclang.map"
to be exported, under the LLVM16 tag.
"clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c" was modified to print a
specific tag, "(copy-assignment operator)", for cursors that are
recognized by `clang_CXXMethod_isCopyAssignmentOperator`.
A new regression test file,
"clang/test/Index/copy-assignment-operator.cpp", was added to ensure
that the correct constructs were recognized or not by the new function.
The "clang/test/Index/get-cursor.cpp" regression test file was updated
as it was affected by the new "(copy-assignment operator)" tag.
A binding for the new function was added to libclang's python's
bindings, in "clang/bindings/python/clang/cindex.py", adding a new
method for `Cursor`, `is_copy_assignment_operator_method`.
The current release note, `clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst`, was modified to
report the new addition under the "libclang" section.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136604
Adds a function to check if a method has been deleted by copy-pasting
the existing implementation of clang_CXXMethod_isDefaulted and changing
it to call CXXMethod::isDeleted() instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133924
I went over the output of the following mess of a command:
(ulimit -m 2000000; ulimit -v 2000000; git ls-files -z |
parallel --xargs -0 cat | aspell list --mode=none --ignore-case |
grep -E '^[A-Za-z][a-z]*$' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n |
grep -vE '.{25}' | aspell pipe -W3 | grep : | cut -d' ' -f2 | less)
and proceeded to spend a few days looking at it to find probable typos
and fixed a few hundred of them in all of the llvm project (note, the
ones I found are not anywhere near all of them, but it seems like a
good start).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130827
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.
The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.
An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.
---
Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:
1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
print types as written. There are customization options there, but
not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
the so called canonical types.
Example:
```
namespace foo {
struct A {};
A a;
};
```
If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
will make it print it accurately even when written without
qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.
2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
the name of the canonical type is the better choice.
3) This patch could expose a bug in how you get the source range of some
TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
dealing with will always include some source location.
4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
`dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.
5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.
Let me know if you need any help!
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
Clang has traditionally allowed C programs to implicitly convert
integers to pointers and pointers to integers, despite it not being
valid to do so except under special circumstances (like converting the
integer 0, which is the null pointer constant, to a pointer). In C89,
this would result in undefined behavior per 3.3.4, and in C99 this rule
was strengthened to be a constraint violation instead. Constraint
violations are most often handled as an error.
This patch changes the warning to default to an error in all C modes
(it is already an error in C++). This gives us better security posture
by calling out potential programmer mistakes in code but still allows
users who need this behavior to use -Wno-error=int-conversion to retain
the warning behavior, or -Wno-int-conversion to silence the diagnostic
entirely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129881
This reverts commit 7c51f02eff because it
stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was re-landed without addressing the
issue or even agreement on how to address the issue. More details and
discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374.
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.
The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.
An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.
---
Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:
1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
print types as written. There are customization options there, but
not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
the so called canonical types.
Example:
```
namespace foo {
struct A {};
A a;
};
```
If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
will make it print it accurately even when written without
qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.
2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
the name of the canonical type is the better choice.
3) This patch could exposed a bug in how you get the source range of some
TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
dealing with will always include some source location.
4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
`dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.
5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.
Let me know if you need any help!
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
This reverts commit bdc6974f92 because it
breaks all the LLDB tests that import the std module.
import-std-module/array.TestArrayFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/deque-basic.TestDequeFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/deque-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentDequeFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/forward_list.TestForwardListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/forward_list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentForwardListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/list.TestListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/queue.TestQueueFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/stack.TestStackFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector.TestVectorFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector-bool.TestVectorBoolFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentVectorFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector-of-vectors.TestVectorOfVectorsFromStdModule.py
https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/45301/
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.
The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.
An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
The mechanism behind "check-all" is recording params of add_lit_testsuite()
calls in global variables LLVM_LIT_*, and then creating an extra suite with
their union at the end.
This avoids composing the check-* targets directly, which doesn't work well.
We generalize this by allowing multiple families of variables LLVM_{name}_LIT_*:
umbrella_lit_testsuite_begin(check-foo)
... test suites here will be added to LLVM_FOO_LIT_* variables ...
umbrella_lit_testsuite_end(check-foo)
(This also moves some implementation muck out of {llvm,clang}/CMakeLists.txt
This patch also changes check-clang-tools to use be an umbrella test target,
which means the clangd and clang-pseudo tests are included in it, along with the
the other testsuites that already are (like check-clang-extra-clang-tidy).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121838
Based on post-commit review discussion on
2bd8493847 with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me -
they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference
token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type
name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as
though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially
the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
This was originally committed in 277623f4d5
Reverted in f9ad1d1c77 due to breakages
outside of clang - lldb seems to have some strange/strong dependence on
"char [N]" versus "char[N]" when printing strings (not due to that name
appearing in DWARF, but probably due to using clang to stringify type
names) that'll need to be addressed, plus a few other odds and ends in
other subprojects (clang-tools-extra, compiler-rt, etc).
Currently, we have no front-end type for ppc_fp128 type in IR. PowerPC
target generates ppc_fp128 type from long double now, but there's option
(-mabi=(ieee|ibm)longdouble) to control it and we're going to do
transition from IBM extended double-double ppc_fp128 to IEEE fp128 in
the future.
This patch adds type __ibm128 which always represents ppc_fp128 in IR,
as what GCC did for that type. Without this type in Clang, compilation
will fail if compiling against future version of libstdcxx (which uses
__ibm128 in headers).
Although all operations in backend for __ibm128 is done by software,
only PowerPC enables support for it.
There's something not implemented in this commit, which can be done in
future ones:
- Literal suffix for __ibm128 type. w/W is suitable as GCC documented.
- __attribute__((mode(IF))) should be for __ibm128.
- Complex __ibm128 type.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93377
Fixes observed warning running `ninja check-all`:
llvm-project/clang/bindings/python/tests/cindex/test_diagnostics.py💯
DeprecationWarning: Please use assertRegex instead.
self.assertRegexpMatches(children[0].spelling
Looks like unittest.assertRegexpMatches has been deprecated in favor of
unittest.assertRegex since Python 3.2, according to:
https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html#deprecated-aliases
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85692
This is primarily motivated by the desire to move from Python2 to
Python3. `PYTHON_EXECUTABLE` is ambiguous. This explicitly identifies
the python interpreter in use. Since the LLVM build seems to be able to
completed successfully with python3, use that across the build. The old
path aliases `PYTHON_EXECUTABLE` to be treated as Python3.
This is primarily motivated by the desire to move from Python2 to
Python3. `PYTHON_EXECUTABLE` is ambiguous. This explicitly identifies
the python interpreter in use. Since the LLVM build seems to be able to
completed successfully with python3, use that across the build. The old
path aliases `PYTHON_EXECUTABLE` to be treated as Python3.
Summary:
The Python ctypes FFI interface is broken on AIX, it cannot properly pass
structures containing arrays ( https://bugs.python.org/issue38628). So
disable the clang python binding tests on AIX till this is resolved.
Reviewers: stevewan, jasonliu, hubert.reinterpretcast, mgorny
Reviewed By: jasonliu, hubert.reinterpretcast
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70675
Summary:
Wraps JSON compilation database with a target and mode adding database
wrapper. So that driver can correctly figure out which toolchain to use.
Note that clients that wants to make use of this target discovery mechanism
needs to link in TargetsInfos and initialize them at startup.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63755
llvm-svn: 364386
Running `make check-all` fails on Solaris 11/SPARC since the clang python
tests FAIL:
............................
======================================================================
FAIL: test_extent (tests.cindex.test_location.TestLocation)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "tests/cindex/test_location.py", line 87, in test_extent
self.assert_location(one.extent.start,line=1,column=1,offset=0)
File "tests/cindex/test_location.py", line 22, in assert_location
self.assertEqual(loc.column, column)
AssertionError: 5 != 1
======================================================================
FAIL: test_get_children (tests.cindex.test_cursor.TestCursor)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "tests/cindex/test_cursor.py", line 70, in test_get_children
self.assertEqual(tu_nodes[0].is_definition(), True)
AssertionError: False != True
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 126 tests in 2.123s
FAILED (failures=2, skipped=6)
Unfortunately, this aborts the rest of `make check-all`, even with `-k`, so
this patch disables the test as is already done on a couple of other
targets.
This allowed the `sparc-sun-solaris2.11` test to finish.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60046
llvm-svn: 357917
check-all invokes check-clang-python which prints the annoying message:
LIBCLANG TOOLING ERROR: fixed-compilation-database: Error while opening fixed database: No such file or directory
json-compilation-database: Error while opening JSON database: No such file or directory
Let's fix it now with os.dup os.dup2 trick.
llvm-svn: 357562
Summary:
This is useful because otherwise there's no easy way to distinguish #pragma
packed(N) from attribute(packed, aligned(N)) that isn't looking at field
offsets (since pragma packed() also creates a packed attribute).
Reviewers: Anastasia, arphaman, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59299
llvm-svn: 356062
The value for CXCursor_ConvergentAttr is not 420. I'm not really sure how easy
it is to test this, and I'm not familiar with the python bindings, just noticed
the error while looking at D57946 to write D58570.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58571
llvm-svn: 354823
The file contents could be of str type. Should use byte length instead
of str length, otherwise utf-8 encoded files may not get properly parsed
for completion.
Source issue: https://github.com/ncm2/ncm2-pyclang#2
Commited on behalf of `roxma'
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56429
llvm-svn: 352039
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
