2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sam McCall
cf9b25e0ad [lit] Script to automate use of %(line-n). Use in CodeComplete tests.
Tests where the RUN-lines/CHECK-ed output refer to line numbers in the test
file are a maintenance burden, as inserting text in the appropriate place
invalidates all the subsequent line numbers.

Lit supports %(line+n) for this, and FileCheck supports [[@LINE+N]].
But many existing tests don't make use of it and still need to be modified.

This commit adds a script that can find line numbers in tests according to a
regex and replace them with the appropriate relative-line reference.
It contains some options to avoid inappropriately rewriting tests where absolute
numbers are appropriate: a "nearby" threshold and a refusal by default to
replace only some matched line numbers.

I've applied it to CodeComplete tests, this proves the concept but also are the
single worst group of tests I've seen in this respect.
These changes are likely to hit merge conflicts, but can be regenerated with:

```
find ../clang/test/CodeCompletion/ -type f | grep -v /Inputs/ | xargs ../llvm/utils/relative_lines.py --verbose --near=20 --pattern='-code-completion-at[ =]%s:(\\d+):' --pattern='requires fix-it: {(\d+):\d+-(\d+):\d+}'
````

As requested in https://reviews.llvm.org/D140044

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59553

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140217
2022-12-19 14:19:21 +01:00
Haojian Wu
9657385960 [AST] Dont invalide VarDecl even the default initializaiton is failed.
Summary:
This patch would cause clang emit more diagnostics, but it is much better than https://reviews.llvm.org/D76831

```cpp
struct A {
  A(int);
  ~A() = delete;
};
void k() {
  A a;
}

```

before the patch:

/tmp/t3.cpp:24:5: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'A'
  A a;
    ^
/tmp/t3.cpp:20:3: note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
  A(int);
  ^
/tmp/t3.cpp:19:8: note: candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
struct A {

After the patch:

/tmp/t3.cpp:24:5: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'A'
  A a;
    ^
/tmp/t3.cpp:20:3: note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
  A(int);
  ^
/tmp/t3.cpp:19:8: note: candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
struct A {
       ^
/tmp/t3.cpp:24:5: error: attempt to use a deleted function
  A a;
    ^
/tmp/t3.cpp:21:3: note: '~A' has been explicitly marked deleted here
  ~A() = delete;

Reviewers: sammccall

Reviewed By: sammccall

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77395
2020-04-14 12:58:48 +02:00