This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.
This patch was generated with:
find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i
A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
In preparation for running clang-format on the whole code base, we are
also removing mentions of the legacy _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY macro in
favor of the newer _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI.
We're still leaving the definition of _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to avoid
creating needless breakage in case some older patches are checked-in
with mentions of the old macro. After we branch for LLVM 18, we can do
another pass to clean up remaining uses of the macro that might have
gotten introduced by mistake (if any) and remove the macro itself at the
same time. This is just a minor convenience to smooth out the transition
as much as possible.
See
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
for the clang-format proposal.
In libc++'s `wchar.h`, before we forward to the system `wchar.h`, we set `__CORRECT_ISO_CPP_WCHAR_H_PROTO` to ensure it defines the correct signature (e.g. `extern "C++" const wchar_t *wmemchr` and not `extern wchar_t *wmemchr`). After D148542, there are cases where we include the system `wchar.h` from within `__mbstate_t.h` without setting that, and so we get a function type mismatch if we transitively include `wchar.h` through multiple headers in a modules-enabled build. Consistently setting it here resolves those build errors.
Alternative 1: we could put this in `__config` instead. I chose to put it here for a more limited scope.
Alternative 2: we could patch `wchar.h` itself to work correctly and remove references `__CORRECT_ISO_CPP_WCHAR_H_PROTO` from libc++ entirely. It does already set it, but with an additional condition that it is being built by GCC >= 4.4. Clang does pretend to be GCC via `__GNUC__` etc. which can be controlled via `-fgnuc-version` command line flags, but that might have other consequences.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150015
When cuchar is compiled independently on platforms that don't have <uchar.h>, it doesn't get a declaration of mbstate_t, and so makes an empty declaration for ::mbstate_t. That conflicts with the declarations in __mbstate_t.h and cwchar since both of those headers do get mbstate_t before making ::mbstate_t.
Change `__mbstate_t.h` to just get the underlying declaration for mbstate_t and not make a declaration for ::mbstate_t. Include __mbstate_t.h in uchar.h and wchar.h when their next headers aren't available so that at least mbstate_t gets defined.
Add __std_mbstate_t.h to declare ::mbstate_t for headers that need that when cuchar or cwchar aren't available (because either _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_WIDE_CHARACTERS or _LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG).
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148542
Libc++ tried accomodating systems that need to be able to define various
__need_FOO macros before including C library headers, however it does not
appear to be needed anymore in most cases. Indeed, glibc used to use that
system to conditionally provide definitions, however almost all instances
of these macros have been removed from glibc years ago.
I think the next step would be to also fix Clang's own builtin headers
to stop needing these macros.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131425
Some platforms don't provide all C library headers. In practice, libc++
only requires a few C library headers to exist, and only a few functions
on those headers. Missing functions that libc++ doesn't need for its own
implementation are handled properly by the using_if_exists attribute,
however a missing header is currently a hard error when we try to
do #include_next.
This patch should make libc++ more flexible on platforms that do not
provide C headers that libc++ doesn't actually require for its own
implementation. The only downside is that it may move some errors from
the #include_next point to later in the compilation if we actually try
to use something that isn't provided, which could be somewhat confusing.
However, these errors should be caught by folks trying to port libc++
over to a new platform (when running the libc++ test suite), not by end
users.
NOTE: This is a reapplicaton of 226409, which was reverted in 674729813
because it broke the build. The issue has now been fixed with
https://reviews.llvm.org/D138062.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136683
Some platforms don't provide all C library headers. In practice, libc++
only requires a few C library headers to exist, and only a few functions
on those headers. Missing functions that libc++ doesn't need for its own
implementation are handled properly by the using_if_exists attribute,
however a missing header is currently a hard error when we try to
do #include_next.
This patch should make libc++ more flexible on platforms that do not
provide C headers that libc++ doesn't actually require for its own
implementation. The only downside is that it may move some errors from
the #include_next point to later in the compilation if we actually try
to use something that isn't provided, which could be somewhat confusing.
However, these errors should be caught by folks trying to port libc++
over to a new platform (when running the libc++ test suite), not by end
users.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136683
We've stopped doing it in libc++ for a while now because these names
would end up rotting as we move things around and copy/paste stuff.
This cleans up all the existing files so as to stop the spreading
as people copy-paste headers around.
Some embedded platforms do not wish to support the C library functionality
for handling wchar_t because they have no use for it. It makes sense for
libc++ to work properly on those platforms, so this commit adds a carve-out
of functionality for wchar_t.
Unfortunately, unlike some other carve-outs (e.g. random device), this
patch touches several parts of the library. However, despite the wide
impact of this patch, I still think it is important to support this
configuration since it makes it much simpler to port libc++ to some
embedded platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111265
The aim is to add the missing z/OS specific implementations for mbsnrtowcs and wcsnrtombs, as part of libc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98207
The aim is to add the missing z/OS specific implementations for mbsnrtowcs and wcsnrtombs, as part of libc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98207
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Microsoft's CRT already provides the const overloads, and it defines the
`_CRT_CONST_CORRECT_OVERLOADS` macro to indicate their presence. Check
for this macro before attempting to define our own const-correct
overloads, to avoid compiler warnings about casts dropping const
qualifiers.
llvm-svn: 313377
Summary:
This patch refactors and tries to remove as much of the Windows support headers as possible. This is needed because they currently introduce super weird include cycles and dependencies between STL and libc headers.
The changes in this patch are:
* remove `support/win32/support.h` completely. The required parts have either been moved into `support/win32/msvc_support.h` (for `MSVC` only helpers not needed by Clang), or directly into their respective `foo.h` headers.
* Combine `locale_win32.h` and `locale_mgmt_win32.h` into a single headers, this header should only be included within `__locale` or `locale` to avoid include cycles.
* Remove the unneeded parts of `limits_win32.h` and re-name it to `limits_msvc_win32.h` since it's only needed by Clang.
I've tested this patch using Clang on Windows, but I suspect it might technically regress our non-existent support for MSVC. Is somebody able to double check?
This refactor is needed to support upcoming fixes to `<locale>` on Windows.
Reviewers: bcraig, rmaprath, compnerd, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: majnemer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32988
llvm-svn: 302727
<string.h> and wcschr, wcspbrk, wcsrchr, wmemchr, and wcsstr from <wchar.h> to
provide a const-correct overload set even when the underlying C library does
not.
This change adds a new macro, _LIBCPP_PREFERRED_OVERLOAD, which (if defined)
specifies that a given overload is a better match than an otherwise equally
good function declaration without the overload. This is implemented in modern
versions of Clang via __attribute__((enable_if)), and not elsewhere.
We use this new macro to define overloads in the global namespace for these
functions that displace the overloads provided by the C library, unless we
believe the C library is already providing the correct signatures.
llvm-svn: 260337
