Summary:
Currently the conversion check does not take place in a context where access control SFINAE is applied. This patch changes the context of the test expression so that SFINAE occurs if access control does not permit the conversion.
Related bug: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22771
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith, dim
Reviewed By: dim
Subscribers: dim, rodrigc, emaste, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8461
llvm-svn: 233552
Summary:
This patch changes std::function to use allocator_traits to rebind the allocator instead of allocator itself.
It also changes most of the tests to use `bare_allocator` where possible instead of `test_allocator`.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8391
llvm-svn: 232686
Summary:
There is no reason to guard `tuple_size`, `tuple_element` and `get<I>(...)` for pair and array inside of `<__tuple>` so that they are only available when we have variadic templates.
This requires there be redundant declarations and definitions. It also makes it easy to get things wrong.
For example the following code should compile (and does in c++11).
```
#define _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_VARIADICS
#include <array>
int main()
{
static_assert((std::tuple_size<std::array<int, 10> volatile>::value == 10), "");
}
```
This patch lifts the non-variadic parts of `tuple_size`, `tuple_types`, and `get<I>(...)` to the top of `<__tuple>` where they don't require variadic templates. This patch also removes `<__tuple_03>` because there is no longer a need for it.
Reviewers: danalbert, K-ballo, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7774
llvm-svn: 232492
Summary:
Currently parts of the SFINAE on tuples default constructor always gets evaluated even when the default constructor is never called or instantiated. This can cause a hard compile error when a tuple is created with types that do not have a default constructor. Below is a self contained example using a pair like class. This code will not compile but probably should.
```
#include <type_traits>
template <class T>
struct IllFormedDefaultImp {
IllFormedDefaultImp(T x) : value(x) {}
constexpr IllFormedDefaultImp() {}
T value;
};
typedef IllFormedDefaultImp<int &> IllFormedDefault;
template <class T, class U>
struct pair
{
template <bool Dummy = true,
class = typename std::enable_if<
std::is_default_constructible<T>::value
&& std::is_default_constructible<U>::value
&& Dummy>::type
>
constexpr pair() : first(), second() {}
pair(T const & t, U const & u) : first(t), second(u) {}
T first;
U second;
};
int main()
{
int x = 1;
IllFormedDefault v(x);
pair<IllFormedDefault, IllFormedDefault> p(v, v);
}
```
One way to fix this is to use `Dummy` in a more involved way in the constructor SFINAE. The following patch fixes these sorts of hard compile errors for tuple.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith, K-ballo, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: ldionne, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7569
llvm-svn: 230120
Summary: No declaration for the type `tuple` is given in c++03 or c++98 modes. Mark all tests that use the actual `tuple` type as UNSUPPORTED.
Reviewers: jroelofs, mclow.lists, danalbert
Reviewed By: danalbert
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5956
llvm-svn: 229808
Summary:
This patch introduces some black magic to detect const and volatile qualified function types such as `void () const`.
The patch works in the following way:
We first rule out any type that satisfies on of the following. These restrictions are important so that the test below works properly.
* `is_class<_Tp>::value`
* `is_union<_Tp>::value`
* `is_void<_Tp>::value`
* `is_reference<_Tp>::value`
* `__is_nullptr_t<_Tp>::value`
If none of the above is true we perform overload resolution on `__source<_Tp>(0)` to determine the return type.
* If `_Tp&` is well-formed we select `_Tp& __source(int)`. `_Tp&` is only ill formed for cv void types and cv/ref qualified function types.
* Otherwise we select `__dummy_type __source(...)`. Since we know `_Tp` cannot be void then it must be a function type.
let `R` be the returned from `__source<_Tp>(0)`.
We perform overload resolution on `__test<_Tp>(R)`.
* If `R` is `__dummy_type` we call `true_type __test(__dummy_type)`.
* if `R` is `_Tp&` and `_Tp&` decays to `_Tp*` we call `true_type __test(_Tp*)`. Only references to function types decay to a pointer of the same type.
* In all other cases we call `false_type __test(...)`.
`__source<_Tp>(0)` will try and form `_Tp&` in the return type. if `_Tp&` is not well formed the return type of `__source<_Tp>(0)` will be dummy type. `_Tp&` is only ill-formed for cv/ref qualified function types (and void which is dealt with elsewhere).
This fixes PR20084 - http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20084
Reviewers: rsmith, K-ballo, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7573
llvm-svn: 229696
Summary:
The bug can be found here: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22468
`__invoke_void_return_wrapper` is needed to properly handle calling a function that returns a value but where the std::function return type is void. Without this '-Wsystem-headers' will cause `function::operator()(...)` to not compile.
Reviewers: eugenis, K-ballo, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7444
llvm-svn: 228705
The SFINAE on the function __mu(Fn, Args...) that evaluates nested bind
expressions always tries to deduce the return type for Fn(Args...) even when Fn
is not a nested bind expression. This can cause hard compile errors when the
instantation of Fn(Args...) is ill-formed. This patch prevents the instantation
of __invoke_of<Fn, Args...> unless Fn is actually a bind expression.
Bug reportand patch from Michel Morin.
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22003
llvm-svn: 224753
Summary:
MSAN and ASAN also replace new/delete which leads to a link error in these tests. Currently they are unsupported but I think it would be useful if these tests could run with sanitizers.
This patch creates a support header that consolidates the new/delete replacement functionality and checking.
When we are using sanitizers new and delete are no longer replaced and the checks always return true.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, danalbert, jroelofs, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6562
llvm-svn: 224741
