Aaron Ballman 8da090381d Improve static_assert/_Static_assert diagnostics
Our diagnostics relating to static assertions were a bit confused. For
instance, when in MS compatibility mode in C (where we accept
static_assert even without including <assert.h>), we would fail
to warn the user that they were using the wrong spelling (even in
pedantic mode), we were missing a compatibility warning about using
_Static_assert in earlier standards modes, diagnostics for the optional
message were not reflected in C as they were in C++, etc.
2021-03-03 08:48:27 -05:00

13 lines
646 B
C

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -E -dM %s | FileCheck --strict-whitespace --check-prefix=NOMS %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fms-compatibility -E -dM %s | FileCheck --strict-whitespace --check-prefix=MS %s
// If the assert macro is defined in MS compatibility mode in C, we
// automatically inject a macro definition for static_assert. Test that the
// macro is properly added to the preprocessed output. This allows us to
// diagonse use of the static_assert keyword when <assert.h> has not been
// included while still being able to compile preprocessed code.
#define assert
MS: #define static_assert _Static_assert
NOMS-NOT: #define static_assert _Static_assert