llvm-capstone/clang/test/SemaTemplate/default-arguments-cxx0x.cpp
Aaron Ballman 0f1c1be196 [clang] Remove rdar links; NFC
We have a new policy in place making links to private resources
something we try to avoid in source and test files. Normally, we'd
organically switch to the new policy rather than make a sweeping change
across a project. However, Clang is in a somewhat special circumstance
currently: recently, I've had several new contributors run into rdar
links around test code which their patch was changing the behavior of.
This turns out to be a surprisingly bad experience, especially for
newer folks, for a handful of reasons: not understanding what the link
is and feeling intimidated by it, wondering whether their changes are
actually breaking something important to a downstream in some way,
having to hunt down strangers not involved with the patch to impose on
them for help, accidental pressure from asking for potentially private
IP to be made public, etc. Because folks run into these links entirely
by chance (through fixing bugs or working on new features), there's not
really a set of problematic links to focus on -- all of the links have
basically the same potential for causing these problems. As a result,
this is an omnibus patch to remove all such links.

This was not a mechanical change; it was done by manually searching for
rdar, radar, radr, and other variants to find all the various
problematic links. From there, I tried to retain or reword the
surrounding comments so that we would lose as little context as
possible. However, because most links were just a plain link with no
supporting context, the majority of the changes are simple removals.

Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158071
2023-08-28 12:13:42 -04:00

162 lines
4.1 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 -verify %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -std=c++14 -verify %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -std=c++20 -verify %s
// expected-no-diagnostics
// Test default template arguments for function templates.
template<typename T = int>
void f0();
template<typename T>
void f0();
void g0() {
f0(); // okay!
}
template<typename T, int N = T::value>
int &f1(T);
float &f1(...);
struct HasValue {
static const int value = 17;
};
void g1() {
float &fr = f1(15);
int &ir = f1(HasValue());
}
namespace PR16689 {
template <typename T1, typename T2> class tuple {
public:
template <typename = T2>
constexpr tuple() {}
};
template <class X, class... Y> struct a : public X {
using X::X;
};
auto x = a<tuple<int, int> >();
}
namespace PR16975 {
template <typename...> struct is {
constexpr operator bool() const { return false; }
};
template <typename... Types>
struct bar {
template <typename T,
bool = is<Types...>()>
bar(T);
};
bar<> foo{0};
struct baz : public bar<> {
using bar::bar;
};
baz data{0};
}
// An IRGen failure due to a symbol collision due to a default argument
// being instantiated twice. Credit goes to Richard Smith for this
// reduction to a -fsyntax-only failure.
namespace rdar23810407 {
// Instantiating the default argument multiple times will produce two
// different lambda types and thus instantiate this function multiple
// times, which will produce conflicting extern variable declarations.
template<typename T> int f(T t) {
extern T rdar23810407_variable;
return 0;
}
template<typename T> int g(int a = f([] {}));
void test() {
g<int>();
g<int>();
}
}
namespace PR13986 {
constexpr unsigned Dynamic = 0;
template <unsigned> class A { template <unsigned = Dynamic> void m_fn1(); };
class Test {
~Test() {}
A<1> m_target;
};
}
// Template B is instantiated during checking if defaulted A copy constructor
// is constexpr. For this we check if S<int> copy constructor is constexpr. And
// for this we check S constructor template with default argument that mentions
// template B. In turn, template instantiation triggers checking defaulted
// members exception spec. The problem is that it checks defaulted members not
// for instantiated class only, but all defaulted members so far. In this case
// we try to check exception spec for A default constructor which requires
// initializer for the field _a. But initializers are added after constexpr
// check so we reject the code because cannot find _a initializer.
namespace rdar34167492 {
template <typename T> struct B { using type = bool; };
template <typename T> struct S {
S() noexcept;
template <typename U, typename B<U>::type = true>
S(const S<U>&) noexcept;
};
class A {
A() noexcept = default;
A(const A&) noexcept = default;
S<int> _a{};
};
}
namespace use_of_earlier_param {
template<typename T> void f(T a, int = decltype(a)());
void g() { f(0); }
}
#if __cplusplus >= 201402L
namespace lambda {
// Verify that a default argument in a lambda can refer to the type of a
// previous `auto` argument without crashing.
template <class T>
void bar() {
(void) [](auto c, int x = sizeof(decltype(c))) {};
}
void foo() {
bar<int>();
}
#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
// PR46648: ensure we don't reject this by triggering default argument
// instantiation spuriously.
auto x = []<typename T>(T x = 123) {};
void y() { x(nullptr); }
template<int A> struct X {
template<int B> constexpr int f() {
auto l = []<int C>(int n = A + B + C) { return n; };
return l.template operator()<3>();
}
};
static_assert(X<100>().f<20>() == 123);
template<> template<int B> constexpr int X<200>::f() {
auto l = []<int C>(int n = 300 + B + C) { return n; };
return l.template operator()<1>();
}
static_assert(X<200>().f<20>() == 321);
template<> template<> constexpr int X<300>::f<20>() {
auto l = []<int C>(int n = 450 + C) { return n; };
return l.template operator()<6>();
}
static_assert(X<300>().f<20>() == 456);
#endif
} // namespace lambda
#endif