llvm-capstone/clang/test/SemaCXX/PR9461.cpp
Nico Weber 4486d61c03 Port r163224 to C++.
The motivation is to fix a crash on

  struct S {} s;
  Foo S::~S() { s.~S(); }

What was happening here was that S::~S() was marked as invalid since its
return type is invalid, and as a consequence CheckFunctionDeclaration() wasn't
called and S::~S() didn't get merged into S's implicit destructor.  This way,
the class ended up with two destructors, which confused the overload printer
when it suddenly had to print two possible destructors for `s.~S()`.

In addition to fixing the crash, this change also seems to improve diagnostics
in a few other places, see test changes.

Crash found by SLi's bot.

llvm-svn: 229639
2015-02-18 05:19:40 +00:00

33 lines
754 B
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
// Don't crash.
template<typename,typename=int,typename=int>struct basic_string;
typedef basic_string<char> string;
template<typename aT,typename,typename oc>
struct basic_string
{
int us;
basic_string(const aT*,const oc&a=int());
int _S_construct();
int _S_construct(int);
_S_construct(); // expected-error {{requires}}
};
template<typename _CharT,typename _Traits,typename _Alloc>
basic_string<_CharT,_Traits,_Alloc>::basic_string(const _CharT* c,const _Alloc&)
:us(_S_construct)
{string a(c);}
struct runtime_error{runtime_error(string);};
struct system_error:runtime_error{ // expected-note {{to match}}
system_error():time_error("" // expected-error 3 {{expected}} expected-note {{to match}}