llvm-capstone/lld/test/ELF/deplibs.s
James Henderson 0aa9c5429b [lld][ELF][test] Improve deplib.s
The test had a few style issues, and I noticed a hole in the coverage
(namely that the search order wasn't tested). Adding cases for the hole
in turn meant other cases weren't important.

The .so test case isn't important, since the code is shared code, so
I've removed it. Additionally, I've modified the usage of the "bar"
directive to show that an unneeded library must still be present, or the
link will fail, even though it isn't linked in.

Reviewed by: MaskRay, grimar

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76851
2020-03-31 12:41:18 +01:00

75 lines
3.3 KiB
ArmAsm

# REQUIRES: x86
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=x86_64 %s -o %t.o
# RUN: echo ".global foo; foo:" | \
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=x86_64 - -o %tfoo.o
# RUN: rm -rf %t.dir %t.cwd
# RUN: mkdir -p %t.dir
## Error if dependent libraries cannot be found.
# RUN: not ld.lld %t.o -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -DOBJ=%t.o --check-prefix MISSING
# MISSING: error: [[OBJ]]: unable to find library from dependent library specifier: foo.a
# MISSING-NEXT: error: [[OBJ]]: unable to find library from dependent library specifier: bar
## Can ignore dependent libraries.
# RUN: not ld.lld %t.o -o /dev/null --no-dependent-libraries 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix IGNORE
# IGNORE: error: undefined symbol: foo
## -r links preserve dependent libraries.
# RUN: ld.lld %t.o %t.o -r -o %t-r.o
# RUN: not ld.lld %t-r.o -o /dev/null 2>&1 | sort | FileCheck %s -DOBJ=%t-r.o --check-prefixes MINUSR
# MINUSR: error: [[OBJ]]: unable to find library from dependent library specifier: bar
# MINUSR-NEXT: error: [[OBJ]]: unable to find library from dependent library specifier: foo.a
# MINUSR-NOT: unable to find library from dependent library specifier
## Dependent libraries searched for symbols after libraries on the command line.
# RUN: mkdir -p %t.cwd
# RUN: cd %t.cwd
# RUN: llvm-ar rc %t.dir/foo.a %tfoo.o
# RUN: touch %t.dir/libbar.so
# RUN: cp %t.dir/foo.a %t.cwd/libcmdline.a
# RUN: ld.lld %t.o libcmdline.a -o /dev/null -L %t.dir --trace 2>&1 | \
# RUN: FileCheck %s -DOBJ=%t.o -DSO=%t.dir --check-prefix CMDLINE \
# RUN: --implicit-check-not=foo.a --implicit-check-not=libbar.so
# CMDLINE: [[OBJ]]
# CMDLINE-NEXT: {{^libcmdline\.a}}
## LLD tries to resolve dependent library specifiers in the following order:
## 1) The literal name in the current working directory.
## 2) The literal name in a library search path.
## 3) The name, prefixed with "lib" and suffixed with ".so" or ".a" in a
## library search path. This means that a directive of "foo.a" could lead
## to a library named "libfoo.a.a" being linked in.
## When using library search paths for dependent libraries, LLD follows the same
## rules as for libraries specified on the command line.
# RUN: cp %t.dir/foo.a %t.cwd/foo.a
# RUN: cp %t.dir/foo.a %t.dir/libfoo.a.a
# RUN: ld.lld %t.o -o /dev/null -L %t.dir --trace 2>&1 | \
# RUN: FileCheck %s -DOBJ=%t.o -DDIR=%t.dir --check-prefix=CWD \
# RUN: --implicit-check-not=foo.a --implicit-check-not=libbar.so
# CWD: [[OBJ]]
# CWD-NEXT: {{^foo\.a}}
# RUN: rm %t.cwd/foo.a
# RUN: ld.lld %t.o -o /dev/null -L %t.dir --trace 2>&1 | \
# RUN: FileCheck %s -DOBJ=%t.o -DDIR=%t.dir --check-prefix=PLAIN-DIR \
# RUN: --implicit-check-not=foo.a --implicit-check-not=libbar.so
# PLAIN-DIR: [[OBJ]]
# PLAIN-DIR-NEXT: [[DIR]]{{[\\/]}}foo.a
# RUN: rm %t.dir/foo.a
# RUN: ld.lld %t.o -o /dev/null -L %t.dir --trace 2>&1 | \
# RUN: FileCheck %s -DOBJ=%t.o -DDIR=%t.dir --check-prefix=LIBA-DIR \
# RUN: --implicit-check-not=foo.a --implicit-check-not=libbar.so
# LIBA-DIR: [[OBJ]]
# LIBA-DIR-NEXT: [[DIR]]{{[\\/]}}libfoo.a.a
call foo
.section ".deplibs","MS",@llvm_dependent_libraries,1
.asciz "foo.a"
## Show that an unneeded archive must be present but may not be linked in.
.asciz "bar"