64421e191b
We don't actually depend on entire X86/AArch64 components that pull in CodeGen, SelectionDAG etc., just the Desc part with opcode and other definitions. Note that it doesn't decouple BOLT from these components - we still pull in X86 and AArch64 from top-level llvm-bolt dependencies as we use assembler and disassembler. It's difficult to reduce these as this requires non-trivial changes to X86/AArch64 components themselves (e.g. moving out AsmPrinter). Reviewed By: rafauler Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124206 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
docs | ||
include/bolt | ||
lib | ||
runtime | ||
test | ||
tools | ||
unittests | ||
utils | ||
CMakeLists.txt | ||
CODE_OWNERS.TXT | ||
LICENSE.TXT | ||
README.md |
BOLT
BOLT is a post-link optimizer developed to speed up large applications.
It achieves the improvements by optimizing application's code layout based on
execution profile gathered by sampling profiler, such as Linux perf
tool.
An overview of the ideas implemented in BOLT along with a discussion of its
potential and current results is available in
CGO'19 paper.
Input Binary Requirements
BOLT operates on X86-64 and AArch64 ELF binaries. At the minimum, the binaries
should have an unstripped symbol table, and, to get maximum performance gains,
they should be linked with relocations (--emit-relocs
or -q
linker flag).
BOLT disassembles functions and reconstructs the control flow graph (CFG) before it runs optimizations. Since this is a nontrivial task, especially when indirect branches are present, we rely on certain heuristics to accomplish it. These heuristics have been tested on a code generated with Clang and GCC compilers. The main requirement for C/C++ code is not to rely on code layout properties, such as function pointer deltas. Assembly code can be processed too. Requirements for it include a clear separation of code and data, with data objects being placed into data sections/segments. If indirect jumps are used for intra-function control transfer (e.g., jump tables), the code patterns should be matching those generated by Clang/GCC.
NOTE: BOLT is currently incompatible with the -freorder-blocks-and-partition
compiler option. Since GCC8 enables this option by default, you have to
explicitly disable it by adding -fno-reorder-blocks-and-partition
flag if
you are compiling with GCC8 or above.
NOTE2: DWARF v5 is the new debugging format generated by the latest LLVM and GCC
compilers. It offers several benefits over the previous DWARF v4. Currently, the
support for v5 is a work in progress for BOLT. While you will be able to
optimize binaries produced by the latest compilers, until the support is
complete, you will not be able to update the debug info with
-update-debug-sections
. To temporarily work around the issue, we recommend
compiling binaries with -gdwarf-4
option that forces DWARF v4 output.
PIE and .so support has been added recently. Please report bugs if you encounter any issues.
Installation
Docker Image
You can build and use the docker image containing BOLT using our docker file. Alternatively, you can build BOLT manually using the steps below.
Manual Build
BOLT heavily uses LLVM libraries, and by design, it is built as one of LLVM tools. The build process is not much different from a regular LLVM build. The following instructions are assuming that you are running under Linux.
Start with cloning LLVM repo:
> git clone https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git
> mkdir build
> cd build
> cmake -G Ninja ../llvm-project/llvm -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="X86;AArch64" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=ON -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS="bolt"
> ninja bolt
llvm-bolt
will be available under bin/
. Add this directory to your path to
ensure the rest of the commands in this tutorial work.
Optimizing BOLT's Performance
BOLT runs many internal passes in parallel. If you foresee heavy usage of BOLT, you can improve the processing time by linking against one of memory allocation libraries with good support for concurrency. E.g. to use jemalloc:
> sudo yum install jemalloc-devel
> LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libjemalloc.so llvm-bolt ....
Or if you rather use tcmalloc:
> sudo yum install gperftools-devel
> LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libtcmalloc_minimal.so llvm-bolt ....
Usage
For a complete practical guide of using BOLT see Optimizing Clang with BOLT.
Step 0
In order to allow BOLT to re-arrange functions (in addition to re-arranging
code within functions) in your program, it needs a little help from the linker.
Add --emit-relocs
to the final link step of your application. You can verify
the presence of relocations by checking for .rela.text
section in the binary.
BOLT will also report if it detects relocations while processing the binary.
Step 1: Collect Profile
This step is different for different kinds of executables. If you can invoke your program to run on a representative input from a command line, then check For Applications section below. If your program typically runs as a server/service, then skip to For Services section.
The version of perf
command used for the following steps has to support
-F brstack
option. We recommend using perf
version 4.5 or later.
For Applications
This assumes you can run your program from a command line with a typical input.
In this case, simply prepend the command line invocation with perf
:
$ perf record -e cycles:u -j any,u -o perf.data -- <executable> <args> ...
For Services
Once you get the service deployed and warmed-up, it is time to collect perf data with LBR (branch information). The exact perf command to use will depend on the service. E.g., to collect the data for all processes running on the server for the next 3 minutes use:
$ perf record -e cycles:u -j any,u -a -o perf.data -- sleep 180
Depending on the application, you may need more samples to be included with
your profile. It's hard to tell upfront what would be a sweet spot for your
application. We recommend the profile to cover 1B instructions as reported
by BOLT -dyno-stats
option. If you need to increase the number of samples
in the profile, you can either run the sleep
command for longer and use
-F<N>
option with perf
to increase sampling frequency.
Note that for profile collection we recommend using cycle events and not
BR_INST_RETIRED.*
. Empirically we found it to produce better results.
If the collection of a profile with branches is not available, e.g., when you run on a VM or on hardware that does not support it, then you can use only sample events, such as cycles. In this case, the quality of the profile information would not be as good, and performance gains with BOLT are expected to be lower.
With instrumentation
If perf record is not available to you, you may collect profile by first instrumenting the binary with BOLT and then running it.
llvm-bolt <executable> -instrument -o <instrumented-executable>
After you run instrumented-executable with the desired workload, its BOLT
profile should be ready for you in /tmp/prof.fdata
and you can skip
Step 2.
Run BOLT with the -help
option and check the category "BOLT instrumentation
options" for a quick reference on instrumentation knobs.
Step 2: Convert Profile to BOLT Format
NOTE: you can skip this step and feed perf.data
directly to BOLT using
experimental -p perf.data
option.
For this step, you will need perf.data
file collected from the previous step and
a copy of the binary that was running. The binary has to be either
unstripped, or should have a symbol table intact (i.e., running strip -g
is
okay).
Make sure perf
is in your PATH
, and execute perf2bolt
:
$ perf2bolt -p perf.data -o perf.fdata <executable>
This command will aggregate branch data from perf.data
and store it in a
format that is both more compact and more resilient to binary modifications.
If the profile was collected without LBRs, you will need to add -nl
flag to
the command line above.
Step 3: Optimize with BOLT
Once you have perf.fdata
ready, you can use it for optimizations with
BOLT. Assuming your environment is setup to include the right path, execute
llvm-bolt
:
$ llvm-bolt <executable> -o <executable>.bolt -data=perf.fdata -reorder-blocks=cache+ -reorder-functions=hfsort -split-functions=2 -split-all-cold -split-eh -dyno-stats
If you do need an updated debug info, then add -update-debug-sections
option
to the command above. The processing time will be slightly longer.
For a full list of options see -help
/-help-hidden
output.
The input binary for this step does not have to 100% match the binary used for
profile collection in Step 1. This could happen when you are doing active
development, and the source code constantly changes, yet you want to benefit
from profile-guided optimizations. However, since the binary is not precisely the
same, the profile information could become invalid or stale, and BOLT will
report the number of functions with a stale profile. The higher the
number, the less performance improvement should be expected. Thus, it is
crucial to update .fdata
for release branches.
Multiple Profiles
Suppose your application can run in different modes, and you can generate
multiple profiles for each one of them. To generate a single binary that can
benefit all modes (assuming the profiles don't contradict each other) you can
use merge-fdata
tool:
$ merge-fdata *.fdata > combined.fdata
Use combined.fdata
for Step 3 above to generate a universally optimized
binary.
License
BOLT is licensed under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.