mirror of
https://github.com/capstone-engine/llvm-capstone.git
synced 2025-02-03 07:38:57 +00:00
b9c1b51e45
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
174 lines
6.1 KiB
C++
174 lines
6.1 KiB
C++
//===-- ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint.cpp ------------------------*- C++ -*-===//
|
|
//
|
|
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
|
|
//
|
|
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
|
|
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "lldb/Target/ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint.h"
|
|
|
|
// C Includes
|
|
// C++ Includes
|
|
// Other libraries and framework includes
|
|
// Project includes
|
|
#include "lldb/Core/Log.h"
|
|
#include "lldb/Core/Stream.h"
|
|
#include "lldb/Target/Process.h"
|
|
#include "lldb/Target/RegisterContext.h"
|
|
|
|
using namespace lldb;
|
|
using namespace lldb_private;
|
|
|
|
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint: Single steps over a breakpoint bp_site_sp at
|
|
// the pc.
|
|
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint(Thread &thread)
|
|
: ThreadPlan(
|
|
ThreadPlan::eKindStepOverBreakpoint, "Step over breakpoint trap",
|
|
thread, eVoteNo,
|
|
eVoteNoOpinion), // We need to report the run since this happens
|
|
// first in the thread plan stack when stepping
|
|
// over a breakpoint
|
|
m_breakpoint_addr(LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS),
|
|
m_auto_continue(false), m_reenabled_breakpoint_site(false)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
m_breakpoint_addr = m_thread.GetRegisterContext()->GetPC();
|
|
m_breakpoint_site_id =
|
|
m_thread.GetProcess()->GetBreakpointSiteList().FindIDByAddress(
|
|
m_breakpoint_addr);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::~ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint() {}
|
|
|
|
void ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::GetDescription(
|
|
Stream *s, lldb::DescriptionLevel level) {
|
|
s->Printf("Single stepping past breakpoint site %" PRIu64 " at 0x%" PRIx64,
|
|
m_breakpoint_site_id, (uint64_t)m_breakpoint_addr);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::ValidatePlan(Stream *error) { return true; }
|
|
|
|
bool ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::DoPlanExplainsStop(Event *event_ptr) {
|
|
StopInfoSP stop_info_sp = GetPrivateStopInfo();
|
|
if (stop_info_sp) {
|
|
// It's a little surprising that we stop here for a breakpoint hit.
|
|
// However, when you single step ONTO a breakpoint
|
|
// we still want to call that a breakpoint hit, and trigger the actions,
|
|
// etc. Otherwise you would see the
|
|
// PC at the breakpoint without having triggered the actions, then you'd
|
|
// continue, the PC wouldn't change,
|
|
// and you'd see the breakpoint hit, which would be odd.
|
|
// So the lower levels fake "step onto breakpoint address" and return that
|
|
// as a breakpoint. So our trace
|
|
// step COULD appear as a breakpoint hit if the next instruction also
|
|
// contained a breakpoint.
|
|
StopReason reason = stop_info_sp->GetStopReason();
|
|
|
|
switch (reason) {
|
|
case eStopReasonTrace:
|
|
case eStopReasonNone:
|
|
return true;
|
|
case eStopReasonBreakpoint:
|
|
// It's a little surprising that we stop here for a breakpoint hit.
|
|
// However, when you single step ONTO a
|
|
// breakpoint we still want to call that a breakpoint hit, and trigger the
|
|
// actions, etc. Otherwise you
|
|
// would see the PC at the breakpoint without having triggered the
|
|
// actions, then you'd continue, the PC
|
|
// wouldn't change, and you'd see the breakpoint hit, which would be odd.
|
|
// So the lower levels fake "step onto breakpoint address" and return that
|
|
// as a breakpoint hit. So our trace
|
|
// step COULD appear as a breakpoint hit if the next instruction also
|
|
// contained a breakpoint. We don't want
|
|
// to handle that, since we really don't know what to do with breakpoint
|
|
// hits. But make sure we don't set
|
|
// ourselves to auto-continue or we'll wrench control away from the plans
|
|
// that can deal with this.
|
|
SetAutoContinue(false);
|
|
return false;
|
|
default:
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::ShouldStop(Event *event_ptr) {
|
|
return !ShouldAutoContinue(event_ptr);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::StopOthers() { return true; }
|
|
|
|
StateType ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::GetPlanRunState() {
|
|
return eStateStepping;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::DoWillResume(StateType resume_state,
|
|
bool current_plan) {
|
|
if (current_plan) {
|
|
BreakpointSiteSP bp_site_sp(
|
|
m_thread.GetProcess()->GetBreakpointSiteList().FindByAddress(
|
|
m_breakpoint_addr));
|
|
if (bp_site_sp && bp_site_sp->IsEnabled())
|
|
m_thread.GetProcess()->DisableBreakpointSite(bp_site_sp.get());
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::WillStop() {
|
|
ReenableBreakpointSite();
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::MischiefManaged() {
|
|
lldb::addr_t pc_addr = m_thread.GetRegisterContext()->GetPC();
|
|
|
|
if (pc_addr == m_breakpoint_addr) {
|
|
// If we are still at the PC of our breakpoint, then for some reason we
|
|
// didn't
|
|
// get a chance to run.
|
|
return false;
|
|
} else {
|
|
Log *log(lldb_private::GetLogIfAllCategoriesSet(LIBLLDB_LOG_STEP));
|
|
if (log)
|
|
log->Printf("Completed step over breakpoint plan.");
|
|
// Otherwise, re-enable the breakpoint we were stepping over, and we're
|
|
// done.
|
|
ReenableBreakpointSite();
|
|
ThreadPlan::MischiefManaged();
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::ReenableBreakpointSite() {
|
|
if (!m_reenabled_breakpoint_site) {
|
|
m_reenabled_breakpoint_site = true;
|
|
BreakpointSiteSP bp_site_sp(
|
|
m_thread.GetProcess()->GetBreakpointSiteList().FindByAddress(
|
|
m_breakpoint_addr));
|
|
if (bp_site_sp) {
|
|
m_thread.GetProcess()->EnableBreakpointSite(bp_site_sp.get());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
void ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::ThreadDestroyed() {
|
|
ReenableBreakpointSite();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::SetAutoContinue(bool do_it) {
|
|
m_auto_continue = do_it;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::ShouldAutoContinue(Event *event_ptr) {
|
|
return m_auto_continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::IsPlanStale() {
|
|
return m_thread.GetRegisterContext()->GetPC() != m_breakpoint_addr;
|
|
}
|