Nikolas Klauser 80643d9366 [libc++][NFC] Rename iterator category checks to make it obvious that they check //only// the iterator category
We plan to add concepts for checking that iterators actually provide what they claim to. This is to avoid people thinking that these type traits actually check the iterator requirements in more detail.

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: Mordante, libcxx-commits, wenlei

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150801
2023-05-18 15:37:28 -07:00

56 lines
1.5 KiB
C++

//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#ifndef _LIBCPP___ALGORITHM_SHIFT_LEFT_H
#define _LIBCPP___ALGORITHM_SHIFT_LEFT_H
#include <__algorithm/move.h>
#include <__config>
#include <__iterator/iterator_traits.h>
#if !defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_PRAGMA_SYSTEM_HEADER)
# pragma GCC system_header
#endif
_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 20
template <class _ForwardIterator>
inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY constexpr
_ForwardIterator
shift_left(_ForwardIterator __first, _ForwardIterator __last,
typename iterator_traits<_ForwardIterator>::difference_type __n)
{
if (__n == 0) {
return __last;
}
_ForwardIterator __m = __first;
if constexpr (__has_random_access_iterator_category<_ForwardIterator>::value) {
if (__n >= __last - __first) {
return __first;
}
__m += __n;
} else {
for (; __n > 0; --__n) {
if (__m == __last) {
return __first;
}
++__m;
}
}
return _VSTD::move(__m, __last, __first);
}
#endif // _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 20
_LIBCPP_END_NAMESPACE_STD
#endif // _LIBCPP___ALGORITHM_SHIFT_LEFT_H