Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm.git synced 2026-07-19 14:13:35 -04:00
Code Issues 328 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #3065] [FEAT]: include_reasoning for OpenRouter #1968

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-22 18:27:28 -05:00 by yindo · 2 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-22 18:27:28 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @timothycarambat on GitHub (Jan 30, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm/issues/3065

Originally assigned to: @timothycarambat on GitHub.

What would you like to see?

https://openrouter.ai/announcements/reasoning-tokens-for-thinking-models

Concerns:

  • Streaming allowed?
  • Only via chat, not during agents to preserve token count/costs
  • Other side effects for non-reasoning models
Originally created by @timothycarambat on GitHub (Jan 30, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm/issues/3065 Originally assigned to: @timothycarambat on GitHub. ### What would you like to see? https://openrouter.ai/announcements/reasoning-tokens-for-thinking-models Concerns: - Streaming allowed? - Only via chat, not during agents to preserve token count/costs - Other side effects for non-reasoning models
yindo added the enhancementfeature request labels 2026-02-22 18:27:28 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-22 18:27:28 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-22 18:27:28 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@morbificagent commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2025):

Was updating to the actual docker a few minutes ago because i wanted to test deepseek r1 via openrouter and was happy that anythingllm can now show the part ;-)

As it doesnt work with openrouter at the moment i would be very happy if this could be implemented.
Im not very good at coding but i will try it too...

@morbificagent commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2025): Was updating to the actual docker a few minutes ago because i wanted to test deepseek r1 via openrouter and was happy that anythingllm can now show the <think> part ;-) As it doesnt work with openrouter at the moment i would be very happy if this could be implemented. Im not very good at coding but i will try it too...
yindo commented 2026-02-22 18:27:28 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@morbificagent commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2025):

OK, have changed the index.js to show the thinking for openrouter...
Its working for me.
Dont wonder as i have a providerselection in the file too as openrouter sometimes uses providers which are slow only because they are cheaper...

Would love to help more with pull requests or something like that but i dont know how to do this and eventually my changes arent that great ;-) But eventually it can help:

index.js.txt

@morbificagent commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2025): OK, have changed the index.js to show the thinking for openrouter... Its working for me. Dont wonder as i have a providerselection in the file too as openrouter sometimes uses providers which are slow only because they are cheaper... Would love to help more with pull requests or something like that but i dont know how to do this and eventually my changes arent that great ;-) But eventually it can help: [index.js.txt](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/18609058/index.js.txt)
yindo changed title from [FEAT]: `include_reasoning` for OpenRouter to [GH-ISSUE #3065] [FEAT]: `include_reasoning` for OpenRouter 2026-06-05 14:43:44 -04:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Desktop
Docker
Integration Request
Integration Request
OS: Linux
OS: Mobile
OS: Windows
UI/UX
blocked
bug
bug
core-team-only
documentation
duplicate
embed-widget
enhancement
feature request
github_actions
good first issue
investigating
needs info / can't replicate
possible bug
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
stage: specifications
wontfix
No Label enhancement feature request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm#1968
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?