Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm.git synced 2026-07-19 22:23:50 -04:00
Code Issues 328 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #4413] [CHORE]: Update this.constructor.name usage #2814

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-22 18:31:23 -05:00 by yindo · 0 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-22 18:31:23 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @timothycarambat on GitHub (Sep 19, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm/issues/4413

Originally assigned to: @angelplusultra on GitHub.

What would you like to see?

In the server and collector we make use of this.constructor.name for the logger of many classes so that for debugging and observability, we know where logs are coming from.

The issue is that in some forms of AnythingLLM, minification is used which can result in the minified name of the Class being used in the logger - which is useless.

Where possible, we should statically hardcode the string in the log call. This may be very tedious and possibly can just be a class prop we use (eg: this.classname="myClassObj"). This will prevent weird minification side effects from occurring.

Originally created by @timothycarambat on GitHub (Sep 19, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm/issues/4413 Originally assigned to: @angelplusultra on GitHub. ### What would you like to see? In the `server` and `collector` we make use of `this.constructor.name` for the logger of many classes so that for debugging and observability, we know where logs are coming from. The issue is that in some forms of AnythingLLM, minification is used which can result in the _minified_ name of the Class being used in the logger - which is useless. Where possible, we should statically hardcode the string in the log call. This may be very tedious and possibly can just be a class prop we use (eg: `this.classname="myClassObj"`). This will prevent weird minification side effects from occurring.
yindo added the enhancementfeature request labels 2026-02-22 18:31:23 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-22 18:31:23 -05:00
yindo changed title from [CHORE]: Update `this.constructor.name` usage to [GH-ISSUE #4413] [CHORE]: Update `this.constructor.name` usage 2026-06-05 14:48:41 -04:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Desktop
Docker
Integration Request
Integration Request
OS: Linux
OS: Mobile
OS: Windows
UI/UX
blocked
bug
bug
core-team-only
documentation
duplicate
embed-widget
enhancement
feature request
github_actions
good first issue
investigating
needs info / can't replicate
possible bug
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
stage: specifications
wontfix
No Label enhancement feature request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm#2814
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?