[GH-ISSUE #5311] [FEAT]: Codex OAuth2 Login Support #5013

Open
opened 2026-06-05 14:51:30 -04:00 by yindo · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @jacobcalvert on GitHub (Mar 31, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm/issues/5311

What would you like to see?

Other similar tools have begun to support the OAuth2 login flow for using OpenAI's Codex credits on paid plans like Plus and Pro instead of standalone API credits. Could this be supported? This would be a great enhancement.

Originally created by @jacobcalvert on GitHub (Mar 31, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm/issues/5311 ### What would you like to see? Other similar tools have begun to support the OAuth2 login flow for using OpenAI's Codex credits on paid plans like Plus and Pro instead of standalone API credits. Could this be supported? This would be a great enhancement.
yindo added the enhancementIntegration Requestfeature request labels 2026-06-05 14:51:30 -04:00
Author
Owner

@timothycarambat commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2026):

This isnt agains their ToS is it? I know Anthropic was dropping bans on people with OpenCode, but if it is permitted then that is a good idea and we can even auto-detect during onboarding.

<!-- gh-comment-id:4164977924 --> @timothycarambat commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2026): This isnt agains their ToS is it? I know Anthropic was dropping bans on people with OpenCode, but if it is permitted then that is a good idea and we can even auto-detect during onboarding.
Author
Owner

@jacobcalvert commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2026):

I don't think it is against their ToS, but we could check . OpenClaw (and all the zillion other 'Claws) are doing it this way, I assume that's all ok. My understanding is:

  • if it's a single user environment and for personal use => OK
  • otherwise => borderline, probably not OK
<!-- gh-comment-id:4165072503 --> @jacobcalvert commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2026): I don't *think* it is against their ToS, but we could check . OpenClaw (and all the zillion other 'Claws) are doing it this way, I assume that's all ok. My understanding is: - if it's a single user environment and for personal use => OK - otherwise => borderline, probably not OK
Author
Owner

@timothycarambat commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2026):

https://x.com/dkundel/status/2009700942724411571?s=46
https://x.com/openaidevs/status/2019221475849564657?s=46

LGTM! Seems like this indeed not against ToS, at least today it isnt

<!-- gh-comment-id:4165194993 --> @timothycarambat commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2026): https://x.com/dkundel/status/2009700942724411571?s=46 https://x.com/openaidevs/status/2019221475849564657?s=46 LGTM! Seems like this indeed not against ToS, at least today it isnt
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm#5013