Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm.git synced 2026-07-19 14:13:35 -04:00
Code Issues 328 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #5563] [BUG]: context drift #5166

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-06-05 14:52:24 -04:00 by yindo · 2 comments
yindo commented 2026-06-05 14:52:24 -04:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @paras03 on GitHub (May 1, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm/issues/5563

How are you running AnythingLLM?

AnythingLLM desktop app

What happened?

i had two workplace created. i had created vectors in one of the workplace, when i was having interaction in the second work place, at very advance stage , suddnly there was am injection of irrelevent respinse and sudden contect dript in the response,The response was based on previous chat in the another workplace, based on the vectors created in another workplace. and it was totally out of context. regretfully, I had to abondon the chat and stop using anything LLM for important project. I

Are there known steps to reproduce?

No,

LLM Provider & Model (if applicable)

I was using Ollama and deeseekv3.1 671b

Embedder Provider & Model (if applicable)

default

Originally created by @paras03 on GitHub (May 1, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm/issues/5563 ### How are you running AnythingLLM? AnythingLLM desktop app ### What happened? i had two workplace created. i had created vectors in one of the workplace, when i was having interaction in the second work place, at very advance stage , suddnly there was am injection of irrelevent respinse and sudden contect dript in the response,The response was based on previous chat in the another workplace, based on the vectors created in another workplace. and it was totally out of context. regretfully, I had to abondon the chat and stop using anything LLM for important project. I ### Are there known steps to reproduce? No, ### LLM Provider & Model (if applicable) I was using Ollama and deeseekv3.1 671b ### Embedder Provider & Model (if applicable) default
yindo added the possible bug label 2026-06-05 14:52:24 -04:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-06-05 14:52:24 -04:00
yindo commented 2026-06-05 14:52:25 -04:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@timothycarambat commented on GitHub (May 1, 2026):

There is no way to determine if this was not just a hallucination. It is not possible for workspaces to share vectors or conversation history. Even threads without a workspace cannot share conversations.

If you embed files in a workspace, they are only available in that workspace and you would know if they were referred to because we always report citations.

Without a reproduction to prove this was actually data across workspaces there is nothing for us to investigate

<!-- gh-comment-id:4361086828 --> @timothycarambat commented on GitHub (May 1, 2026): There is no way to determine if this was not just a hallucination. It is not possible for workspaces to share vectors or conversation history. Even threads without a workspace cannot share conversations. If you embed files in a workspace, they are only available in that workspace and you would know if they were referred to because we always report citations. Without a reproduction to prove this was actually data across workspaces there is nothing for us to investigate
yindo commented 2026-06-05 14:52:25 -04:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@paras03 commented on GitHub (May 2, 2026):

Well, it is not possible to reproduce. I was in midst of a long project of reviewing and preparing strategic presentation for a upcoming business. my work place was as a financial and strategic consultant with no vectors embedded in this work place. I had another work place created as a legal experts where i embedded many laws (conpany law, tax law, CONTRACT LAW , SOME SHARE HOLDING AGREEMENT ETC)

In the midst of my project (in work place as financial consultant ) in response to certain question it started refering to matter from existing contract i vectored in my workplace as legal consultant. It drifted the context so much , that I had to abondon to the project.

If i have to reproduce the issue, i have to spend so much time and check if it happens, this is not possible because, it is so much time consuming, which I do not have enough, and i uninstalled anything due to this mishap.

I do understand that developers appear to be unable to do anything without recreation and analysis of issues. Well, I frankly shared my issue, with the hope that it might help improve the product which is very good. In fact, it helped me in few project thanks to its workplace and RAG system. And I was very much looking forward to using it for my consulting profession and had no reason to criticise it. But seeing many hours of intense work going waste compelled me to abondon it. Though I studied the configuration in detail, implemented recomeneded configuration, still i may have done something wrong. If that may be the case, then also it should be shared with others so that such mistakes is not introduced. That is why i shared my experience as a bug report

Thanking you all

<!-- gh-comment-id:4363953923 --> @paras03 commented on GitHub (May 2, 2026): Well, it is not possible to reproduce. I was in midst of a long project of reviewing and preparing strategic presentation for a upcoming business. my work place was as a financial and strategic consultant with no vectors embedded in this work place. I had another work place created as a legal experts where i embedded many laws (conpany law, tax law, CONTRACT LAW , SOME SHARE HOLDING AGREEMENT ETC) In the midst of my project (in work place as financial consultant ) in response to certain question it started refering to matter from existing contract i vectored in my workplace as legal consultant. It drifted the context so much , that I had to abondon to the project. If i have to reproduce the issue, i have to spend so much time and check if it happens, this is not possible because, it is so much time consuming, which I do not have enough, and i uninstalled anything due to this mishap. I do understand that developers appear to be unable to do anything without recreation and analysis of issues. Well, I frankly shared my issue, with the hope that it might help improve the product which is very good. In fact, it helped me in few project thanks to its workplace and RAG system. And I was very much looking forward to using it for my consulting profession and had no reason to criticise it. But seeing many hours of intense work going waste compelled me to abondon it. Though I studied the configuration in detail, implemented recomeneded configuration, still i may have done something wrong. If that may be the case, then also it should be shared with others so that such mistakes is not introduced. That is why i shared my experience as a bug report Thanking you all
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Desktop
Docker
Integration Request
Integration Request
OS: Linux
OS: Mobile
OS: Windows
UI/UX
blocked
bug
bug
core-team-only
documentation
duplicate
embed-widget
enhancement
feature request
github_actions
good first issue
investigating
needs info / can't replicate
possible bug
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
stage: specifications
wontfix
No Label possible bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Mintplex-Labs/anything-llm#5166
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?