This patch adds a pass to replace calls to vector intrinsics (i.e., LLVM
intrinsics operating on vector operands) with calls to a vector library.
Currently, calls to LLVM intrinsics are only replaced with calls to vector
libraries when scalar calls to intrinsics are vectorized by the Loop- or
SLP-Vectorizer.
With this pass, it is now possible to replace calls to LLVM intrinsics
already operating on vector operands, e.g., if such code was generated
by MLIR. For the replacement, information from the TargetLibraryInfo,
e.g., as specified via -vector-library is used.
This is a re-try of the original commit 2303e93e66 that was reverted
due to pass manager problems. Other minor changes have also been made.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95373
This patch adds a pass to replace calls to vector intrinsics
(i.e., LLVM intrinsics operating on vector operands) with
calls to a vector library.
Currently, calls to LLVM intrinsics are only replaced with
calls to vector libraries when scalar calls to intrinsics are
vectorized by the Loop- or SLP-Vectorizer.
With this pass, it is now possible to replace calls to LLVM
intrinsics already operating on vector operands, e.g., if
such code was generated by MLIR. For the replacement,
information from the TargetLibraryInfo, e.g., as specified
via -vector-library is used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95373
This reverts commit 16c8f6e91344ec9840d6aa9ec6b8d0c87a104ca3 with fix.
-Wswitch catched an unhandled enum value due to recent commits in
TargetPassConfig.cpp.
This reverts commit 94427af60c66ffea655a3084825c6c3a9deec1ad (relands
4646de5d75cfce3da4ddeffb6eb8e66e38238800 with fix).
Use "return std::move(AsmStreamer);" instead of "return AsmStreamer;" in
LVMTargetMachine::createMCStreamer. Unlike Clang, GCC seems having trouble
inserting a implicit lvalue->rvalue conversion.
Following up on D67687.
Please refer to the RFC here http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143309.html
`CodeGenPassBuilder` is the NPM counterpart of `TargetPassConfig` with below differences.
- Debugging features (MIR print/verify, disable pass, start/stop-before/after, etc.) living in `TargetPassConfig` are moved to use PassInstrument as much as possible. (Implementation also lives in `TargetPassConfig.cpp`)
- `TargetPassConfig` is a polymorphic base (virtual inheritance) to build the target-dependent pipeline whereas `CodeGenPassBuilder` is the CRTP base/helper to implement the target-dependent pipeline. The motivation is flexibility for targets to customize the pipeline, inlining opportunity, and fits the overall NPM value semantics design.
- `TargetPassConfig` is a legacy immutable pass to declare hooks for targets to customize some target-independent codegen layer behavior. This is partially ported to TargetMachine::options. The rest, such as `createMachineScheduler/createPostMachineScheduler`, are left out for now. They should be implemented in LLVMTargetMachine in the future.
Reviewed By: arsenm, aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83608
This reverts commit 31ecf8d29d81d196374a562c6d2bd2c25a62861e.
This reverts commit 3fdaa8602a086a3fca5f0fc8527536ac659079d0.
There is laying violation for Target->CodeGen.
Following up on D67687.
Please refer to the RFC here http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143309.html
`CodeGenPassBuilder` is the NPM counterpart of `TargetPassConfig` with below differences.
- Debugging features (MIR print/verify, disable pass, start/stop-before/after, etc.) living in `TargetPassConfig` are moved to use PassInstrument as much as possible. (Implementation also lives in `TargetPassConfig.cpp`)
- `TargetPassConfig` is a polymorphic base (virtual inheritance) to build the target-dependent pipeline whereas `CodeGenPassBuilder` is the CRTP base/helper to implement the target-dependent pipeline. The motivation is flexibility for targets to customize the pipeline, inlining opportunity, and fits the overall NPM value semantics design.
- `TargetPassConfig` is a legacy immutable pass to declare hooks for targets to customize some target-independent codegen layer behavior. This is partially ported to TargetMachine::options. The rest, such as `createMachineScheduler/createPostMachineScheduler`, are left out for now. They should be implemented in LLVMTargetMachine in the future.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83608
