Current approach doesn't work well in cases when multiple paths are predicted to be "cold". By "cold" paths I mean those containing "unreachable" instruction, call marked with 'cold' attribute and 'unwind' handler of 'invoke' instruction. The issue is that heuristics are applied one by one until the first match and essentially ignores relative hotness/coldness
of other paths.
New approach unifies processing of "cold" paths by assigning predefined absolute weight to each block estimated to be "cold". Then we propagate these weights up/down IR similarly to existing approach. And finally set up edge probabilities based on estimated block weights.
One important difference is how we propagate weight up. Existing approach propagates the same weight to all blocks that are post-dominated by a block with some "known" weight. This is useless at least because it always gives 50\50 distribution which is assumed by default anyway. Worse, it causes the algorithm to skip further heuristics and can miss setting more accurate probability. New algorithm propagates the weight up only to the blocks that dominates and post-dominated by a block with some "known" weight. In other words, those blocks that are either always executed or not executed together.
In addition new approach processes loops in an uniform way as well. Essentially loop exit edges are estimated as "cold" paths relative to back edges and should be considered uniformly with other coldness/hotness markers.
Reviewed By: yrouban
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79485
Constant hoisting may hide the constant value behind bitcast for And's
operand. Track down the constant to make the BFI result consistent
regardless of hoisting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91450
This patch teaches the jump threading pass to call BPI->eraseBlock
when it folds a conditional branch.
Without this patch, BranchProbabilityInfo could end up with stale edge
probabilities for the basic block containing the conditional branch --
one edge probability with less than 1.0 and the other for a removed
edge.
This patch is one of the steps before we can safely re-apply D91017.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91511
This patch simplifies BranchProbabilityInfo by changing the type of
Probs.
Without this patch:
DenseMap<Edge, BranchProbability> Probs
maps an ordered pair of a BasicBlock* and a successor index to an edge
probability.
With this patch:
DenseMap<const BasicBlock *, SmallVector<BranchProbability, 2>> Probs
maps a BasicBlock* to a vector of edge probabilities.
BranchProbabilityInfo has a property that for a given basic block, we
either have edge probabilities for all successors or do not have any
edge probability at all. This property combined with the current map
type leads to a somewhat complicated algorithm in eraseBlock to erase
map entries one by one while increasing the successor index.
The new map type allows us to remove the all edge probabilities for a
given basic block in a more intuitive manner, namely:
Probs.erase(BB);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91017
The patch simplifies BranchProbabilityInfo::getEdgeProbability by
handling two cases separately, depending on whether we have edge
probabilities.
- If we have edge probabilities, then add up probabilities for
successors being equal to Dst.
- Otherwise, return the number of ocurrences divided by the total
number of successors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90980
A new method is introduced to allow bulk copy of outgoing edge
probabilities from one block to another. This can be useful when
a block is cloned from another one and we do not know if there
are edge probabilities set for the original block or not.
Copying outside of the BranchProbabilityInfo class makes the user
unconditionally set the cloned block's edge probabilities even if
they are unset for the original block.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90839
BranchProbabilityInfo::eraseBlock() is a public method and
can be called without deleting the block itself.
This method is made remove the correspondent tracking handle
from BranchProbabilityInfo::Handles along with
the probabilities of the block. Handles.erase() call is moved
to eraseBlock().
In setEdgeProbability() we need to add the block handle only once.
Reviewed By: kazu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90838
This refactoring allows to eliminate the MaxSuccIdx map
proposed in the commit a7b662d0.
The idea is to remove probabilities for a block BB for
all its successors one by one from first, second, ...
till N-th until they are defined in Probs. This works
because probabilities for the block are set at once for
all its successors from number 0 to N-1 and the rest
are removed if there were stale probs.
The protected method setEdgeProbability(), which set
probabilities for individual successor, is removed.
This makes it clear that the probabilities are set in
bulk by the public method with the same name.
Reviewed By: kazu, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90837
CallInst::updateProfWeight() creates branch_weights with i64 instead of i32.
To be more consistent everywhere and remove lots of casts from uint64_t
to uint32_t, use i64 for branch_weights.
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88609
This patch ensures that BranchProbabilityInfo::eraseBlock(BB) deletes
all entries in Probs associated with with BB.
Without this patch, stale entries for BB may remain in Probs after
eraseBlock(BB), leading to a situation where a newly created basic
block has an edge probability associated with it even before the pass
responsible for creating the basic block adds any edge probability to
it.
Consider the current implementation of eraseBlock(BB):
for (const_succ_iterator I = succ_begin(BB), E = succ_end(BB); I != E; ++I) {
auto MapI = Probs.find(std::make_pair(BB, I.getSuccessorIndex()));
if (MapI != Probs.end())
Probs.erase(MapI);
}
Notice that it uses succ_begin(BB) and succ_end(BB), which are based
on BB->getTerminator(). This means that if the terminator changes
between calls to setEdgeProbability and eraseBlock, then we may not
examine all pairs associated with BB.
This is exactly what happens in MaybeMergeBasicBlockIntoOnlyPred,
which merges basic blocks A into B if A is the sole predecessor of B,
and B is the sole successor of A. It replaces the terminator of A
with UnreachableInst before (indirectly) calling eraseBlock(A).
The patch fixes the problem by keeping track of all edge probablities
entered with setEdgeProbability in a map from BasicBlock* to a
successor index.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90272
CallInst::updateProfWeight() creates branch_weights with i64 instead of i32.
To be more consistent everywhere and remove lots of casts from uint64_t
to uint32_t, use i64 for branch_weights.
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88609
Similarly as for pointers, even for integers a == b is usually false.
GCC also uses this heuristic.
Reviewed By: ebrevnov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85781
Similarly as for pointers, even for integers a == b is usually false.
GCC also uses this heuristic.
Reviewed By: ebrevnov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85781
Similarly as for pointers, even for integers a == b is usually false.
GCC also uses this heuristic.
Reviewed By: ebrevnov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85781
This is one more NFC part extracted from D79485. Normal and SCC based loops have very different representation and have to be handled separatly each time we deal with loops. D79485 is going to introduce much more extensive use of loops what will be problematic with out this change.
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84838
There is a silly mistake where release() is used instead of reset() for free resources of unique pointer.
Reviewed By: ebrevnov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84747
In order to facilitate review of D79485 here is a small NFC change which restructures code around handling of SCCs in BPI.
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84514
Summary:
eraseBlock is trying to erase all probability info for the given BB.
This info is stored in a DenseMap organized like so:
using Edge = std::pair<const BasicBlock *, unsigned>;
DenseMap<Edge, BranchProbability> Probs;
where the unsigned in the Edge key is the successor id.
It was walking through every single map entry, checking if the BB in the
key's pair matched the given BB. Much more efficient is to do what
another method (getEdgeProbability) was already doing, which is to walk
the successors of the BB, and simply do a map lookup on the key formed
from each <BB, successor id> pair.
Doing this dropped the overall compile time for a file containing a
very large function by around 32%.
Reviewers: davidxl, xur
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83596
Allow InvokeInst to have the second optional prof branch weight for
its unwind branch. InvokeInst is a terminator with two successors.
It might have its unwind branch taken many times. If so
the BranchProbabilityInfo unwind branch heuristic can be inaccurate.
This patch allows a higher accuracy calculated with both branch
weights set.
Changes:
- A new section about InvokeInst is added to
the BranchWeightMetadata page. It states the old information that
missed in the doc and adds new about the second branch weight.
- Verifier is changed to allow either 1 or 2 branch weights
for InvokeInst.
- A new test is written for BranchProbabilityInfo to demonstrate
the main improvement of the simple fix in calcMetadataWeights().
- Several new testcases are created for Inliner. Those check that
both weights are accounted for invoke instruction weight
calculation.
- PGOUseFunc::setBranchWeights() is fixed to be applicable to
InvokeInst.
Reviewers: davidxl, reames, xur, yamauchi
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80618
When fixing probability of unreachable edges in
BranchProbabilityInfo::calcMetadataWeights() proportionally distribute
remainder probability over the reachable edges. The old implementation
distributes the remainder probability evenly.
See examples in the fixed tests.
Reviewers: yamauchi, ebrevnov
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80611
Hide the method that allows setting probability for particular edge
and introduce a public method that sets probabilities for all
outgoing edges at once.
Setting individual edge probability is error prone. More over it is
difficult to check that the total probability is 1.0 because there is
no easy way to know when the user finished setting all
the probabilities.
Related bug is fixed in BranchProbabilityInfo::calcMetadataWeights().
Changing unreachable branch probabilities to raw(1) and distributing
the rest (oldProbability - raw(1)) over the reachable branches could
introduce total probability inaccuracy bigger than 1/numOfBranches.
Reviewers: yamauchi, ebrevnov
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79396
Hide the method that allows setting probability for particular
edge and introduce a public method that sets probabilities for
all outgoing edges at once.
Setting individual edge probability is error prone. More over
it is difficult to check that the total probability is 1.0
because there is no easy way to know when the user finished
setting all the probabilities.
Reviewers: yamauchi, ebrevnov
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79396
Summary:
By design 'BranchProbabilityInfo:: getEdgeProbability(const BasicBlock *Src, const BasicBlock *Dst) const' should return sum of probabilities over all edges from Src to Dst. Current implementation is buggy and returns 1/num_of_successors if probabilities are not explicitly set.
Note current implementation of BPI printing has an issue as well and annotates each edge with sum of probabilities over all ages from one basic block to another. That's why 30% probability reported (instead of 10%) in the lit test. This is not urgent issue since only printing is affected.
Note also current implementation assumes that either all or none edges have probabilities set. This is not the only place which uses such assumption. At least we should assert that in verifier. In addition we can think on a more robust API of BPI which would prevent situations.
Reviewers: skatkov, yrouban, taewookoh
Reviewed By: skatkov
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79071
Summary: Currenlty BPI unconditionally creates post dominator tree each time. While this is not incorrect we can save compile time by reusing existing post dominator tree (when it's valid) provided by analysis manager.
Reviewers: skatkov, taewookoh, yrouban
Reviewed By: skatkov
Subscribers: hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78987
Summary:
Rename `succ_const_iterator` to `const_succ_iterator` and
`succ_const_range` to `const_succ_range` for consistency with the
predecessor iterators, and the corresponding iterators in
MachineBasicBlock.
Reviewers: nicholas, dblaikie, nlewycky
Subscribers: hiraditya, bmahjour, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75952
Summary: b19ec1eb3d0c has been reverted because of the test failures
with PowerPC targets. This patch addresses the issues from the previous
commit.
Test Plan: ninja check-all. Confirmed that CodeGen/PowerPC/pr36292.ll
and CodeGen/PowerPC/sms-cpy-1.ll pass
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Summary:
While updatePostDominatedByUnreachable attemps to find basic blocks that are post-domianted by unreachable blocks, it currently cannot handle loops precisely, because it doesn't use the actual post dominator tree analysis but relies on heuristics of visiting basic blocks in post-order. More precisely, when the entire loop is post-dominated by the unreachable block, current algorithm fails to detect the entire loop as post-dominated by the unreachable because when the algorithm reaches to the loop latch it fails to tell all its successors (including the loop header) will "eventually" be post-domianted by the unreachable block, because the algorithm hasn't visited the loop header yet. This makes BPI for the loop latch to assume that loop backedges are taken with 100% of probability. And because of this, block frequency info sometimes marks virtually dead loops (which are post dominated by unreachable blocks) super hot, because 100% backedge-taken probability makes the loop iteration count the max value. updatePostDominatedByColdCall has the exact same problem as well.
To address this problem, this patch makes PostDominatedByUnreachable/PostDominatedByColdCall to be computed with the actual post-dominator tree.
Reviewers: skatkov, chandlerc, manmanren
Reviewed By: skatkov
Subscribers: manmanren, vsk, apilipenko, Carrot, qcolombet, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70104
This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is
very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it
caused lots of recompilation.
I found this fact by looking at this table, which is sorted by the
number of times a file was changed over the last 100,000 git commits
multiplied by the number of object files that depend on it in the
current checkout:
recompiles touches affected_files header
342380 95 3604 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h
314730 234 1345 llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
307036 118 2602 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
213049 59 3611 llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h
170422 47 3626 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Compiler.h
162225 45 3605 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h
158319 63 2513 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h
140322 39 3598 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h
137647 59 2333 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h
131619 73 1803 llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h
Before this change, touching InitializePasses.h would cause 1345 files
to recompile. After this change, touching it only causes 550 compiles in
an incremental rebuild.
Reviewers: bkramer, asbirlea, bollu, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70211
Since NaN is very rare in normal programs, so the probability for floating point unordered comparison should be extremely small. Current probability is 3/8, it is too large, this patch changes it to a tiny number.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65303
llvm-svn: 371541
