formatv_object currently uses the implicitly defined move constructor,
but it is buggy. In typical use-cases, the problem doesn't show-up
because all calls to the move constructor are elided. Thus, the buggy
constructors are never invoked.
The issue especially shows-up when code is compiled using the
-fno-elide-constructors compiler flag. For instance, this is useful when
attempting to collect accurate code coverage statistics.
The exact issue is the following:
The Parameters data member is correctly moved, thus making the
parameters occupy a new memory location in the target
object. Unfortunately, the default copying of the Adapters blindly
copies the vector of pointers, leaving each of these pointers
referencing the parameters in the original object instead of the copied
one. These pointers quickly become dangling when the original object is
deleted. This quickly leads to crashes.
The solution is to update the Adapters pointers when performing a move.
The copy constructor isn't useful for format objects and can thus be
deleted.
This resolves PR33388.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34463
llvm-svn: 310475
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
Summary:
This replaces the format member search, which was quite complicated, with a more
direct approach to detecting whether a class should be formatted using the
format-member method. Instead we use a special type llvm::format_adapter, which
every adapter must inherit from. Then the search can be simply implemented with
the is_base_of type trait.
Aside from the simplification, I like this way more because it makes it more
explicit that you are supposed to use this type only for adapter-like
formattings, and the other approach (format_provider overloads) should be used
as a default (a mistake I made when first trying to use this library).
The only slight change in behaviour here is that now choose the format-adapter
branch even if the format member invocation will fail to compile (e.g. because it is a
non-const member function and we are passing a const adapter), whereas
previously we would have gone on to search for format_providers for the type.
However, I think that is actually a good thing, as it probably means the
programmer did something wrong.
Reviewers: zturner, inglorion
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27679
llvm-svn: 289795
This introduces a new type-safe general purpose formatting
library. It provides compile-time type safety, does not require
a format specifier (since the type is deduced), and provides
mechanisms for extending the format capability to user defined
types, and overriding the formatting behavior for existing types.
This patch additionally adds documentation for the API to the
LLVM programmer's manual.
Mailing List Thread:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-October/105836.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25587
llvm-svn: 286682
