This caused PR34629: asserts firing when building Chromium. It also broke some
buildbots building test-suite as reported on the commit thread.
> Summary:
> 1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
> extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
> appearing in the DAG.
> e.g.
> T1 = A + B
> T2 = T1 + 10
> T3 = T2 + A
> For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
> Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
>
> 2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
> so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
> could be factored out.
> e.g.
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
> will be factored as following
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
>
> 3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
> thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
>
> Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet
>
> Reviewed By: lsaba
>
> Subscribers: spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 313376
Summary:
1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
appearing in the DAG.
e.g.
T1 = A + B
T2 = T1 + 10
T3 = T2 + A
For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
could be factored out.
e.g.
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
will be factored as following
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet
Reviewed By: lsaba
Subscribers: spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 313343
These are removed in C++17. We still have some users of
unary_function::argument_type, so just spell that typedef out. No
functionality change intended.
Note that many of the argument types are actually wrong :)
llvm-svn: 313287
We already have a combine for this pattern when the input to shl is add, so we just need to enable the transformation when the input is or.
Original patch by @tstellar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D19325
llvm-svn: 313251
Use RotAmt.urem(VTBits) instead of AND(RotAmt, VTBits - 1)
TBH I don't expect non-power-of-2 types to be created, but it makes the logic clearer and matches what we do in other rotation combines.
llvm-svn: 313245
After the split of the Scatter operation, the order of the new instructions is well defined - Lo goes before Hi. Otherwise the semantic of Scatter (from LSB to MSB) is broken.
I'm chaining 2 nodes to prevent reordering.
Differential Revision https://reviews.llvm.org/D37670
llvm-svn: 312894
Fixes some combine issues for AMDGPU where we weren't
getting the many extract_vector_elt combines expected
in a future patch.
This should really be checking isOperationLegalOrCustom on
the extract. That improves a number of x86 lit tests, but
a few get stuck in an infinite loop from one place
where a similar looking extract is created. I have a
different workaround in the backend for that which
keeps many of those improvements, but also adds a few
regressions.
llvm-svn: 312730
Summary:
This intrinsic represents a label with a list of associated metadata
strings. It is modelled as reading and writing inaccessible memory so
that it won't be removed as dead code. I think the intention is that the
annotation strings should appear at most once in the debug info, so I
marked it noduplicate. We are allowed to inline code with annotations as
long as we strip the annotation, but that can be done later.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36904
llvm-svn: 312569
The function combineShuffleToVectorExtend in DAGCombine might generate an illegal typed node after "legalize types" phase, causing assertion on non-simple type to fail afterwards.
Adding a type check in case the combine is running after the type legalize pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37330
llvm-svn: 312438
Previously we would just describe the first register and then call it
quits. This patch emits fragment expressions for each register.
<rdar://problem/34075307>
llvm-svn: 312169
The loop dependence check looks for dependencies between store merge
candidates not captured by the chain sub-DAG doing a check of
predecessors which may be very large. Conservatively bound number of
nodes checked for compilation time. (Resolves PR34326).
Landing on behalf of Nirav Dave to unblock the 5.0.0 release.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37220
llvm-svn: 312022
Only do this before operations are legalized of BUILD_VECTOR is Legal for the target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37186
llvm-svn: 311892
Summary:
If all the operands of a BUILD_VECTOR extract elements from same vector then split the
vector efficiently based on the maximum vector access index.
This will also fix PR 33784
Reviewers: zvi, delena, RKSimon, thakis
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: chandlerc, eladcohen, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35788
llvm-svn: 311833
This goes back to a discussion about IR canonicalization. We'd like to preserve and convert
more IR to 'select' than we currently do because that's likely the best choice in IR:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-September/105335.html
...but that's often not true for codegen, so we need to account for this pattern coming in
to the backend and transform it to better DAG ops.
Steps in this patch:
1. Add an EVT param to the existing convertSelectOfConstantsToMath() TLI hook to more finely
enable this transform. Other targets will probably want that anyway to distinguish scalars
from vectors. We're using that here to exclude AVX512 targets, but it may not be necessary.
2. Convert a vselect to ext+add. This eliminates a constant load/materialization, and the
vector ext is often free.
Implementing a more general fold using xor+and can be a follow-up for targets that don't have
a legal vselect. It's also possible that we can remove the TLI hook for the special case fold
implemented here because we're eliminating a constant, but it needs to be tested on other
targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36840
llvm-svn: 311731
When one operand is a user of another in a promoted binary operation
we may replace and delete the returned value before returning
triggering an assertion. Reorder node replacements to prevent this.
Fixes PR34137.
Landing on behalf of Nirav.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36581
llvm-svn: 311623
This partially reverts r311429 in favor of making ISD::isConstantSplatVector do something not confusing. Turns out the only other user of it was also having to deal with the weird property of it returning a smaller size.
So rather than continue to deal with this quirk everywhere, just make the interface do something sane.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37039
llvm-svn: 311510
I was contacted by Jesper Antonsson from Ericsson who ran into problems
with r311181 in their test suites with for an out-of-tree target.
Because of the latter I don't have a reproducer, but we definitely don't
want to modify the data structure on which we are iterating inside the
loop.
llvm-svn: 311466
When expanding a BRCOND into a BR_CC, do not create an AND 1
if one already exists.
Review: D36705
Patch by Joel Galenson <jgalenson@google.com>
llvm-svn: 311447
This adds debug messages to various functions that create new SDValue nodes.
This is e.g. useful to have during legalization, as otherwise it can prints
legalization info of nodes that did not appear in the dumps before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36984
llvm-svn: 311444
ISD::isConstantSplatVector can shrink to the smallest splat width. But we don't check the size of the resulting APInt at all. This can cause us to misinterpret the results.
This patch just adds a flag to prevent the APInt from changing width.
Fixes PR34271.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36996
llvm-svn: 311429
Summary:
If all the operands of a BUILD_VECTOR extract elements from same vector then split the
vector efficiently based on the maximum vector access index.
Reviewers: zvi, delena, RKSimon, thakis
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: chandlerc, eladcohen, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35788
llvm-svn: 311255
This patch teaches the SDag type legalizer how to split up debug info for
integer values that are split into a hi and lo part.
(re-commit)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36805
llvm-svn: 311181
This patch teaches the SDag type legalizer how to split up debug info for
integer values that are split into a hi and lo part.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36805
llvm-svn: 311102
The SelectionDAGBuilder translates various conditional branches into
CaseBlocks which are then translated into SDNodes. If a conditional
branch results in multiple CaseBlocks only the first CaseBlock is
translated into SDNodes immediately, the rest of the CaseBlocks are
put in a queue and processed when all LLVM IR instructions in the
basic block have been processed.
When a CaseBlock is transformed into SDNodes the SelectionDAGBuilder
is queried for the current LLVM IR instruction and the resulting
SDNodes are annotated with the debug info of the current
instruction (if it exists and has debug metadata).
When the deferred CaseBlocks are processed, the SelectionDAGBuilder
does not have a current LLVM IR instruction, and the resulting SDNodes
will not have any debuginfo. As DwarfDebug::beginInstruction() outputs
a .loc directive for the first instruction in a labeled
block (typically the case for something coming from a CaseBlock) this
tends to produce a line-0 directive.
This patch changes the handling of CaseBlocks to store the current
instruction's debug info into the CaseBlock when it is created (and the
SelectionDAGBuilder knows the current instruction) and to always use
the stored debug info when translating a CaseBlock to SDNodes.
Patch by Frej Drejhammar!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36671
llvm-svn: 311097
When v1i1 is legal (e.g. AVX512) the legalizer can reach
a case where a v1i1 SETCC with an illgeal vector type operand
wasn't scalarized (since v1i1 is legal) but its operands does
have to be scalarized. This used to assert because SETCC was
missing from the vector operand scalarizer.
This patch attemps to teach the legalizer to handle these cases
by scalazring the operands, converting the node into a scalar
SETCC node.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36651
llvm-svn: 311071
Summary: It is creating useless work as the commuted nodes is the same as the node we are working on in that case.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33840
llvm-svn: 310832
into vextract(vNiX,Idx) when creating vextract with getNode().
This case appeared in AVX512 after fixing pr33349 in r310552.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36571
llvm-svn: 310828
Summary:
Without the SrcVT its hard to know what is really being asked for. For example if your target has 128, 256, and 512 bit vectors. Maybe extracting 128 from 256 is cheap, but maybe extracting 128 from 512 is not.
For x86 we do support extracting a quarter of a 512-bit register. But for i1 vectors we don't have isel patterns for extracting arbitrary pieces. So we need this to have a correct implementation of isExtractSubvectorCheap for mask vectors.
Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, efriedma
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36649
llvm-svn: 310793
