Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 371834
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet, JDevlieghere, alexshap, rupprecht, jhenderson
Subscribers: sdardis, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, jakehehrlich, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, jsji, seiya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67499
llvm-svn: 371742
Breaks BUILD_SHARED_LIBS build, introduces cycles in library dependency
graphs. (clangInterp depends on clangAST which depends on clangInterp)
This reverts r370839, which is an yet another recommit of D64146.
llvm-svn: 370874
Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 370839
Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 370636
Summary: Removes a not so useful function from DataLayout and cleans up Support/MathExtras.h
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66691
llvm-svn: 369824
The current minimum GCC version is 4.8 (soon to be 5.1), we there don't need to check for older versions. While I'm around Compiler.h, also update some of the doxygen comment.
llvm-svn: 367508
Added AddOverflow, SubOverflow and MulOverflow to compute truncated results and return a flag indicating whether overflow occured.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65494
llvm-svn: 367470
Extract the sources to the GCD of the original size and target size,
padding with implicit_def as necessary.
Also fix the case where the requested source type is wider than the
original result type. This was ignoring the type, and just using the
destination. Do the operation in the requested type and truncate back.
llvm-svn: 366367
This matches APInt's versions of these functions, and there is no need for these to be size_t.
(as well as __builtin_clzll())
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60823
llvm-svn: 362503
This matches countLeadingOnes() and countTrailingOnes(), and
APInt's countLeadingZeros() and countTrailingZeros().
(as well as __builtin_clzll())
llvm-svn: 361724
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
With the removal of intrin.h in an earlier patch, the intrinsics
that we were actually using were manually re-declared, however
several of them were missed leading to compilation failures with
MSVC. Fix those.
llvm-svn: 335427
This is repeatably worth 0.3s compile time on MathExtras.cpp. This is a
very popular header, and it basically pulls all Intel intrinsics into
every LLVM TU. Let's not do that.
llvm-svn: 335406
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290
llvm-svn: 331272
The PDB reserves certain blocks for the FPM that describe which
blocks in the file are allocated and which are free. We weren't
filling that out at all, and in some cases we were even stomping
it with incorrect data. This patch writes a correct FPM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36235
llvm-svn: 309896
Pretty sure this will automatically promoted to match the type of the other operand of the subtract. There's plenty of other similar code around here without this cast.
llvm-svn: 309653
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
Frequently you you want a bitmask consisting of a specified
number of 1s, either at the beginning or end of a word.
The naive way to do this is to write
template<typename T>
T leadingBitMask(unsigned N) {
return (T(1) << N) - 1;
}
but using this function you cannot produce a word with every
bit set to 1 (i.e. leadingBitMask<uint8_t>(8)) because left
shift is undefined when N is greater than or equal to the
number of bits in the word.
This patch provides an efficient, branch-free implementation
that works for all values of N in [0, CHAR_BIT*sizeof(T)]
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32212
llvm-svn: 300710
This reverts r299062, which caused build failures on Windows.
It also reverts the attempts to fix the windows builds in r299064 and r299065.
The introduction of namespace llvm::sys::detail makes MSVC, and seemingly also
mingw, complain about ambiguity with the existing namespace llvm::detail.
E.g.:
C:\b\slave\sanitizer-windows\llvm\include\llvm/Support/MathExtras.h(184): error C2872: 'detail': ambiguous symbol
C:\b\slave\sanitizer-windows\llvm\include\llvm/Support/PointerLikeTypeTraits.h(31): note: could be 'llvm::detail'
C:\b\slave\sanitizer-windows\llvm\include\llvm/Support/Host.h(80): note: or 'llvm::sys::detail'
In r299064 and r299065 I tried to fix these ambiguities, based on the errors
reported in the log files. It seems however that the build stops early when
this kind of error is encountered, and many build-then-fix-iterations on
Windows may be needed to fix this. Therefore reverting r299062 for now to
get the build working again on Windows.
llvm-svn: 299066
Summary: Previously we type-punned through a union, which is not safe.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28161
llvm-svn: 290715
Summary: With MSVC 2013 and GCC < 4.8 gone, we can use the "constexpr" keyword.
Reviewers: bkramer, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25901
llvm-svn: 284947
Summary:
This change fixes issues with `LLVM_CONSTEXPR` functions and
`TrailingObjects::FixedSizeStorage`. In particular, some of the
functions marked `LLVM_CONSTEXPR` used by `FixedSizeStorage` were not
implemented such that they evaluate successfully as part of a constant
expression despite constant arguments.
This change also implements a more traditional template-meta path to
accommodate MSVC, and adds unit tests for `FixedSizeStorage`.
Drive-by fix: the access control for members of `TrailingObjectsImpl` is
tightened.
Reviewers: faisalv, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22668
llvm-svn: 277270
Summary:
This change adds `LLVM_CONSTEXPR` to functions selected as follows:
- the body is already valid under C++11 for a `constexpr` function,
- the evaluation of the function, given constant arguments, will not
fail during the evaluation of a constant expression, and
- the above properties are easily verifiable at a glance.
Note: the evaluation of the function cannot fail if the instantiation
triggers a static assertion failure.
Reviewers: faisalv, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22824
llvm-svn: 277269
Summary:
Per D22441, MSVC warns on our old implementation of isUInt<64>. It sees
uint64_t(1) << 64 and doesn't realize that it's not going to be
executed. Writing as a template specialization is ugly, but prevents
the warning.
Reviewers: RKSimon
Subscribers: majnemer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22472
llvm-svn: 275909
We negated a value with a signed type which invited problems when that
value was the most negative signed number. Use an unsigned type
for the value instead. It will compute the same twos complement
result without the UB.
llvm-svn: 275815
Summary:
Previously we were relying on 2's complement underflow in an int64_t.
Now we cast to a uint64_t so we explicitly get the behavior we want.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: dylanmckay, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22445
llvm-svn: 275722
Summary:
The bit width must be greater than zero, otherwise we shift by the
integer's width, which is UB. Also (more obviously) the width must be
less than or equal to the integer's width, otherwise we shift by a
negative number, which is also UB.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits, dylanmckay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22442
llvm-svn: 275720
Summary:
Previously we were doing 1 << S. "1" is an int, so this doesn't work
when S >= 32.
This patch also adds some static_asserts to these functions to ensure
that we don't hit UB by shifting left too much.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits, dylanmckay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22441
llvm-svn: 275719
Summary:
This shift is undefined behavior (and, as compiled by clang, gives the
wrong answer for maxUIntN(64)).
Reviewers: mkuper
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jroelofs, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22430
llvm-svn: 275656
This adds method and tests for writing to a PDB stream. With
this, even a PDB stream which is discontiguous can be treated
as a sequential stream of bytes for the purposes of writing.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21157
llvm-svn: 272369
