Commit Graph

14759 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Hans Wennborg
e065abf74b Fix a couple of redundant conditional expressions (PR27283, PR28282)
llvm-svn: 265987
2016-04-11 20:35:01 +00:00
Matthew Simpson
94955b1eeb [LoopUtils, LV] Fix PR27246 (first-order recurrences)
This patch ensures that when we detect first-order recurrences, we reject a phi
node if its previous value is also a phi node. During vectorization the initial
and previous values of the recurrence are shuffled together to create the value
for the current iteration. However, phi nodes are not widened like other
instructions. This fixes PR27246.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18971

llvm-svn: 265983
2016-04-11 19:48:18 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
68bd68b7b2 add FIXME comment; NFC
llvm-svn: 265970
2016-04-11 17:35:57 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
86526c47b6 add an assert for safety; NFC
llvm-svn: 265969
2016-04-11 17:27:44 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
3172549776 variable names start with a capital letter; NFC
llvm-svn: 265968
2016-04-11 17:25:23 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
6e95a2af4a [InstCombine] use canEvaluateShiftedShift() to handle the lshr case (NFCI)
We need just a couple of logic tweaks to consolidate the shl and lshr cases.

This is step 5 of refactoring to solve PR26760:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26760

llvm-svn: 265965
2016-04-11 17:11:55 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
c3b4340d01 [InstCombine] don't try to shift an illegal amount (PR26760)
This is the straightforward fix for PR26760:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26760

But we still need to make some changes to generalize this helper function
and then send the lshr case into here.

llvm-svn: 265960
2016-04-11 16:50:32 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
9d615dcbe9 [InstCombine] rename variables in shifted-shift helper function (NFCI)
This is step 3 of refactoring to solve PR26760:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26760

llvm-svn: 265954
2016-04-11 16:11:07 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
2bc03c53fa [InstCombine] add helper function for shift-shift optimization (NFCI)
This is step 2 of refactoring to solve PR26760:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26760

llvm-svn: 265951
2016-04-11 15:43:41 +00:00
Sanjoy Das
23c7d74ce2 This reverts commit r265913 and r265912
See PR27315

r265913: "[IndVars] Eliminate op.with.overflow when possible"

r265912: "[SCEV] See through op.with.overflow intrinsics"
llvm-svn: 265950
2016-04-11 15:26:18 +00:00
Teresa Johnson
d7c9485243 [ThinLTO] Move summary computation from BitcodeWriter to new pass
Summary:
This is the first step in also serializing the index out to LLVM
assembly.

The per-module summary written to bitcode is moved out of the bitcode
writer and to a new analysis pass (ModuleSummaryIndexWrapperPass).
The pass itself uses a new builder class to compute index, and the
builder class is used directly in places where we don't have a pass
manager (e.g. llvm-as).

Because we are computing summaries outside of the bitcode writer, we no
longer can use value ids created by the bitcode writer's
ValueEnumerator. This required changing the reference graph edge type
to use a new ValueInfo class holding a union between a GUID (combined
index) and Value* (permodule index). The Value* are converted to the
appropriate value ID during bitcode writing.

Also, this enables removal of the BitWriter library's dependence on the
Analysis library that was previously required for the summary computation.

Reviewers: joker.eph

Subscribers: joker.eph, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18763

llvm-svn: 265941
2016-04-11 13:58:45 +00:00
Sanjoy Das
979adb799a [IndVars] Eliminate op.with.overflow when possible
Summary:
If we can prove that an op.with.overflow intrinsic does not overflow, we
can get rid of the intrinsic, and replace it with non-wrapping
arithmetic.

Reviewers: atrick, regehr

Subscribers: sanjoy, mcrosier, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18685

llvm-svn: 265913
2016-04-10 22:50:31 +00:00
Elena Demikhovsky
8410bf33a6 Loop vectorization with uniform load
Vectorization cost of uniform load wasn't correctly calculated.
As a result, a simple loop that loads a uniform value wasn't vectorized.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18940

llvm-svn: 265901
2016-04-10 16:53:19 +00:00
Teresa Johnson
e41b24ef17 [ThinLTO] Remove unused parameter (NFC)
llvm-svn: 265900
2016-04-10 15:17:26 +00:00
Sanjoy Das
85af6d6f07 Maintain calling convention when inling calls to llvm.deoptimize
The behavior here was buggy -- we'd forget the calling convention after
inlining a callsite calling llvm.deoptimize.

llvm-svn: 265867
2016-04-09 00:22:59 +00:00
Evgeny Stupachenko
eb50bea9cf test commit
llvm-svn: 265840
2016-04-08 20:20:38 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
436cc1b92b ValueMapper: Extract llvm::RemapFunction from IRMover.cpp, NFC
Strip out the remapping parts of IRLinker::linkFunctionBody and put them
in ValueMapper.cpp under the name Mapper::remapFunction (with a
top-level entry-point llvm::RemapFunction).

This is a nice cleanup on its own since it puts the remapping code
together and shares a single Mapper context for the entire
IRLinker::linkFunctionBody Call.  Besides that, this will make it easier
to break the co-recursion between IRMover.cpp and ValueMapper.cpp in
follow ups.

llvm-svn: 265835
2016-04-08 19:26:32 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
732203fd1c ValueMapper: Always use Mapper::mapValue from remapInstruction, NFCI
Use Mapper::mapValue instead of llvm::MapValue from
Mapper::remapInstruction when mapping an incoming block for a PHINode
(follow-up to r265832).  This will implicitly pass along the
Materializer argument, but when this code was added in r133513 there was
no Materializer argument.  I suspect this call to MapValue was just
missed in r182776 since it's not observable (basic blocks can't be
materialized, and they don't reference other values).

llvm-svn: 265833
2016-04-08 19:17:13 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
61b07b7af9 ValueMapper: Roll RemapInstruction into Mapper, NFC
Add Mapper::remapInstruction, move the guts of llvm::RemapInstruction
into it, and use the same Mapper for most of the calls to MapValue and
MapMetadata.  There should be no functionality change here.

I left off the call to MapValue that wasn't passing in a Materializer
argument (for basic blocks of PHINodes).  It shouldn't change
functionality either, but I'm suspicious enough to commit separately.

llvm-svn: 265832
2016-04-08 19:09:34 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
695a2ff629 ValueMapper: Don't memoize metadata when RF_NoModuleLevelChanges
Prevent the Metadata side-table in ValueMap from growing unnecessarily
when RF_NoModuleLevelChanges.  As a drive-by, make ValueMap::hasMD,
which apparently had no users until I used it here for testing, actually
compile.

llvm-svn: 265828
2016-04-08 18:49:36 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
238a64e1c5 ValueMapper: Stop memoizing MDStrings
Stop adding MDString to the Metadata section of the ValueMap in
MapMetadata.  It blows up the size of the map for no benefit, since we
can always return quickly anyway.

There is a potential follow-up that I don't think I'll push on right
away, but maybe someone else is interested:  stop checking for a
pre-mapped MDString, and move the `isa<MDString>()` checks in
Mapper::mapSimpleMetadata and MDNodeMapper::getMappedOp in front of the
`VM.getMappedMD()` calls.  While this would preclude explicitly
remapping MDStrings it would probably be a little faster.

llvm-svn: 265827
2016-04-08 18:47:02 +00:00
David Majnemer
08e9ca8730 [InstCombine] Fix miscompile in FoldSPFofSPF
We had a select of a cast of a select but attempted to replace the outer
select with the inner select dispite their incompatible types.

Patch by Anton Korobeynikov!

This fixes PR27236.

llvm-svn: 265805
2016-04-08 16:51:49 +00:00
David Majnemer
8f75cadbc7 [InstCombine] Add a peephole for redundant assumes
Two or more identical assumes are occasionally next to each other in a
basic block.
While our generic machinery will turn a redundant assume into a no-op,
it is not super cheap.
We can perform a simpler check to achieve the same result for this case.

llvm-svn: 265801
2016-04-08 16:37:12 +00:00
David Majnemer
a4716b737d [LoopVectorize] Register cloned assumptions
InstCombine cannot effectively remove redundant assumptions without them
registered in the assumption cache.  The vectorizer can create identical
assumptions but doesn't register them with the cache, resulting in
slower compile times because InstCombine tries to reason about a lot
more assumptions.

Fix this by registering the cloned assumptions.

llvm-svn: 265800
2016-04-08 16:37:10 +00:00
Silviu Baranga
a0999051a2 Re-commit [SCEV] Introduce a guarded backedge taken count and use it in LAA and LV
This re-commits r265535 which was reverted in r265541 because it
broke the windows bots. The problem was that we had a PointerIntPair
which took a pointer to a struct allocated with new. The problem
was that new doesn't provide sufficient alignment guarantees.
This pattern was already present before r265535 and it just happened
to work. To fix this, we now separate the PointerToIntPair from the
ExitNotTakenInfo struct into a pointer and a bool.

Original commit message:

Summary:
When the backedge taken codition is computed from an icmp, SCEV can
deduce the backedge taken count only if one of the sides of the icmp
is an AddRecExpr. However, due to sign/zero extensions, we sometimes
end up with something that is not an AddRecExpr.

However, we can use SCEV predicates to produce a 'guarded' expression.
This change adds a method to SCEV to get this expression, and the
SCEV predicate associated with it.

In HowManyGreaterThans and HowManyLessThans we will now add a SCEV
predicate associated with the guarded backedge taken count when the
analyzed SCEV expression is not an AddRecExpr. Note that we only do
this as an alternative to returning a 'CouldNotCompute'.

We use new feature in Loop Access Analysis and LoopVectorize to analyze
and transform more loops.

Reviewers: anemet, mzolotukhin, hfinkel, sanjoy

Subscribers: flyingforyou, mcrosier, atrick, mssimpso, sanjoy, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17201

llvm-svn: 265786
2016-04-08 14:29:09 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
89c4487fee Reapply "ValueMapper: Treat LocalAsMetadata more like function-local Values"
This reverts commit r265765, reapplying r265759 after changing a call from
LocalAsMetadata::get to ValueAsMetadata::get (and adding a unit test).  When a
local value is mapped to a constant (like "i32 %a" => "i32 7"), the new debug
intrinsic operand may no longer be pointing at a local.

    http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage1-configure-RA_build/19020/

The previous coommit message follows:

--

This is a partial re-commit -- maybe more of a re-implementation -- of
r265631 (reverted in r265637).

This makes RF_IgnoreMissingLocals behave (almost) consistently between
the Value and the Metadata hierarchy.  In particular:

  - MapValue returns nullptr or "metadata !{}" for missing locals in
    MetadataAsValue/LocalAsMetadata bridging paris, depending on
    the RF_IgnoreMissingLocals flag.

  - MapValue doesn't memoize LocalAsMetadata-related results.

  - MapMetadata no longer deals with LocalAsMetadata or
    RF_IgnoreMissingLocals at all.  (This wasn't in r265631 at all, but
    I realized during testing it would make the patch simpler with no
    loss of generality.)

r265631 went too far, making both functions universally ignore
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals.  This broke building (e.g.) compiler-rt.
Reassociate (and possibly other passes) don't currently maintain
dominates-use invariants for metadata operands, resulting in IR like
this:

    define void @foo(i32 %arg) {
      call void @llvm.some.intrinsic(metadata i32 %x)
      %x = add i32 1, i32 %arg
    }

If the inliner chooses to inline @foo into another function, then
RemapInstruction will call `MapValue(metadata i32 %x)` and assert that
the return is not nullptr.

I've filed PR27273 to add a Verifier check and fix the underlying
problem in the optimization passes.

As a workaround, return `!{}` instead of nullptr for unmapped
LocalAsMetadata when RF_IgnoreMissingLocals is unset.  Otherwise, match
the behaviour of r265631.

Original commit message:

    ValueMapper: Make LocalAsMetadata match function-local Values

    Start treating LocalAsMetadata similarly to function-local members of
    the Value hierarchy in MapValue and MapMetadata.

      - Don't memoize them.
      - Return nullptr if they are missing.

    This also cleans up ConstantAsMetadata to stop listening to the
    RF_IgnoreMissingLocals flag.

llvm-svn: 265768
2016-04-08 03:13:22 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
957a52adbf Revert "ValueMapper: Treat LocalAsMetadata more like function-local Values"
This reverts commit r265759, since even this limited version breaks some
bots:
  http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux/builds/3311
  http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-autoconf/builds/17696

This also reverts r265761 "ValueMapper: Unduplicate
RF_NoModuleLevelChanges check, NFC", since I had trouble separating it
from r265759.

llvm-svn: 265765
2016-04-08 00:56:21 +00:00
Sanjoy Das
b20d278ebd Don't IPO over functions that can be de-refined
Summary:
Fixes PR26774.

If you're aware of the issue, feel free to skip the "Motivation"
section and jump directly to "This patch".

Motivation:

I define "refinement" as discarding behaviors from a program that the
optimizer has license to discard.  So transforming:

```
void f(unsigned x) {
  unsigned t = 5 / x;
  (void)t;
}
```

to

```
void f(unsigned x) { }
```

is refinement, since the behavior went from "if x == 0 then undefined
else nothing" to "nothing" (the optimizer has license to discard
undefined behavior).

Refinement is a fundamental aspect of many mid-level optimizations done
by LLVM.  For instance, transforming `x == (x + 1)` to `false` also
involves refinement since the expression's value went from "if x is
`undef` then { `true` or `false` } else { `false` }" to "`false`" (by
definition, the optimizer has license to fold `undef` to any non-`undef`
value).

Unfortunately, refinement implies that the optimizer cannot assume
that the implementation of a function it can see has all of the
behavior an unoptimized or a differently optimized version of the same
function can have.  This is a problem for functions with comdat
linkage, where a function can be replaced by an unoptimized or a
differently optimized version of the same source level function.

For instance, FunctionAttrs cannot assume a comdat function is
actually `readnone` even if it does not have any loads or stores in
it; since there may have been loads and stores in the "original
function" that were refined out in the currently visible variant, and
at the link step the linker may in fact choose an implementation with
a load or a store.  As an example, consider a function that does two
atomic loads from the same memory location, and writes to memory only
if the two values are not equal.  The optimizer is allowed to refine
this function by first CSE'ing the two loads, and the folding the
comparision to always report that the two values are equal.  Such a
refined variant will look like it is `readonly`.  However, the
unoptimized version of the function can still write to memory (since
the two loads //can// result in different values), and selecting the
unoptimized version at link time will retroactively invalidate
transforms we may have done under the assumption that the function
does not write to memory.

Note: this is not just a problem with atomics or with linking
differently optimized object files.  See PR26774 for more realistic
examples that involved neither.

This patch:

This change introduces a new set of linkage types, predicated as
`GlobalValue::mayBeDerefined` that returns true if the linkage type
allows a function to be replaced by a differently optimized variant at
link time.  It then changes a set of IPO passes to bail out if they see
such a function.

Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel, dexonsmith, joker.eph, rnk

Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18634

llvm-svn: 265762
2016-04-08 00:48:30 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
efcfeb35a8 ValueMapper: Unduplicate RF_NoModuleLevelChanges check, NFC
llvm-svn: 265761
2016-04-08 00:41:10 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
1f42c70b4f ValueMapper: Treat LocalAsMetadata more like function-local Values
This is a partial re-commit -- maybe more of a re-implementation -- of
r265631 (reverted in r265637).

This makes RF_IgnoreMissingLocals behave (almost) consistently between
the Value and the Metadata hierarchy.  In particular:

  - MapValue returns nullptr or "metadata !{}" for missing locals in
    MetadataAsValue/LocalAsMetadata bridging paris, depending on
    the RF_IgnoreMissingLocals flag.

  - MapValue doesn't memoize LocalAsMetadata-related results.

  - MapMetadata no longer deals with LocalAsMetadata or
    RF_IgnoreMissingLocals at all.  (This wasn't in r265631 at all, but
    I realized during testing it would make the patch simpler with no
    loss of generality.)

r265631 went too far, making both functions universally ignore
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals.  This broke building (e.g.) compiler-rt.
Reassociate (and possibly other passes) don't currently maintain
dominates-use invariants for metadata operands, resulting in IR like
this:

    define void @foo(i32 %arg) {
      call void @llvm.some.intrinsic(metadata i32 %x)
      %x = add i32 1, i32 %arg
    }

If the inliner chooses to inline @foo into another function, then
RemapInstruction will call `MapValue(metadata i32 %x)` and assert that
the return is not nullptr.

I've filed PR27273 to add a Verifier check and fix the underlying
problem in the optimization passes.

As a workaround, return `!{}` instead of nullptr for unmapped
LocalAsMetadata when RF_IgnoreMissingLocals is unset.  Otherwise, match
the behaviour of r265631.

Original commit message:

    ValueMapper: Make LocalAsMetadata match function-local Values

    Start treating LocalAsMetadata similarly to function-local members of
    the Value hierarchy in MapValue and MapMetadata.

      - Don't memoize them.
      - Return nullptr if they are missing.

    This also cleans up ConstantAsMetadata to stop listening to the
    RF_IgnoreMissingLocals flag.

llvm-svn: 265759
2016-04-08 00:33:44 +00:00
Ulrich Weigand
bf2fa50c24 [GVN] Address review comments for D18662
As suggested by Chandler in his review comments for D18662, this
follow-on patch renames some variables in GetLoadValueForLoad and
CoerceAvailableValueToLoadType to hopefully make it more obvious
which variables hold value sizes and which hold load/store sizes.

No functional change intended.

llvm-svn: 265687
2016-04-07 15:55:11 +00:00
Ulrich Weigand
4c20bac964 [GVN] Fix handling of sub-byte types in big-endian mode
When GVN wants to re-interpret an already available value in a smaller
type, it needs to right-shift the value on big-endian systems to ensure
the correct bytes are accessed.  The shift value is the difference of
the sizes of the two types.

This is correct as long as both types occupy multiples of full bytes.
However, when one of them is a sub-byte type like i1, this no longer
holds true: we still need to shift, but only to access the correct
*byte*.  Accessing bits within the byte requires no shift in either
endianness; e.g. an i1 resides in the least-significant bit of its
containing byte on both big- and little-endian systems.

Therefore, the appropriate shift value to be used is the difference of
the *storage* sizes of the two types.  This is already handled correctly
in one place where such a shift takes place (GetStoreValueForLoad), but
is incorrect in two other places: GetLoadValueForLoad and
CoerceAvailableValueToLoadType.

This patch changes both places to use the storage size as well.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18662

llvm-svn: 265684
2016-04-07 15:45:02 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer
5cf908079f Make helper functions static. NFC.
llvm-svn: 265653
2016-04-07 10:10:09 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
e5b711647a Revert "ValueMapper: Make LocalAsMetadata match function-local Values"
This reverts commit r265631, since it caused bot failures:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux/builds/3256
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-aarch64-42vma/builds/7272

Looks like something is depending on the old behaviour.  I'll try to
track it down and recommit.

llvm-svn: 265637
2016-04-07 02:10:50 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
3863b4df3a ValueMapper: Allow RF_IgnoreMissingLocals and RF_NullMapMissingGlobalValues
Remove the assertion that disallowed the combination, since
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals should have no effect on globals.  As it happens,
RF_NullMapMissingGlobalValues asserted in MapValue(Constant*,...), so I
also changed a cast to a cast_or_null to get my test passing.

llvm-svn: 265633
2016-04-07 01:22:45 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
4b4ae21d40 ValueMapper: Make LocalAsMetadata match function-local Values
Start treating LocalAsMetadata similarly to function-local members of
the Value hierarchy in MapValue and MapMetadata.

  - Don't memoize them.
  - Return nullptr if they are missing.

This also cleans up ConstantAsMetadata to stop listening to the
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals flag.

llvm-svn: 265631
2016-04-07 01:08:39 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
5f260975e3 IR: RF_IgnoreMissingValues => RF_IgnoreMissingLocals, NFC
Clarify what this RemapFlag actually means.

  - Change the flag name to match its intended behaviour.
  - Clearly document that it's not supposed to affect globals.
  - Add a host of FIXMEs to indicate how to fix the behaviour to match
    the intent of the flag.

RF_IgnoreMissingLocals should only affect the behaviour of
RemapInstruction for function-local operands; namely, for operands of
type Argument, Instruction, and BasicBlock.  Currently, it is *only*
passed into RemapInstruction calls (and the transitive MapValue calls
that it makes).

When I split Metadata from Value I didn't understand the flag, and I
used it in a bunch of places for "global" metadata.

This commit doesn't have any functionality change, but prepares to
cleanup MapMetadata and MapValue.

llvm-svn: 265628
2016-04-07 00:26:43 +00:00
Michael Zolotukhin
7b4123e034 Follow-up for r265605: don't mutate vector we're iterating.
llvm-svn: 265625
2016-04-07 00:09:42 +00:00
Mike Aizatsky
1602c50235 [sancov] enabling coverage edge pruning by default.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18844

llvm-svn: 265615
2016-04-06 23:24:37 +00:00
Michael Zolotukhin
fa8d1d0bc1 [LoopUnroll] Fix the way we update DT after complete unrolling.
Updating dominators for exit-blocks of the unrolled loops is not enough,
as shown in PR27157. The proper way is to update dominators for all
dominance-children of original loop blocks.

llvm-svn: 265605
2016-04-06 21:47:12 +00:00
JF Bastien
f4f5b32f44 NFC: make AtomicOrdering an enum class
Summary:
In the context of http://wg21.link/lwg2445 C++ uses the concept of
'stronger' ordering but doesn't define it properly. This should be fixed
in C++17 barring a small question that's still open.

The code currently plays fast and loose with the AtomicOrdering
enum. Using an enum class is one step towards tightening things. I later
also want to tighten related enums, such as clang's
AtomicOrderingKind (which should be shared with LLVM as a 'C++ ABI'
enum).

This change touches a few lines of code which can be improved later, I'd
like to keep it as NFC for now as it's already quite complex. I have
related changes for clang.

As a follow-up I'll add:
  bool operator<(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
  bool operator>(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
  bool operator<=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
  bool operator>=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
This is separate so that clang and LLVM changes don't need to be in sync.

Reviewers: jyknight, reames

Subscribers: jyknight, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18775

llvm-svn: 265602
2016-04-06 21:19:33 +00:00
Fiona Glaser
258c99d67d Loop Unroll: add options and tweak to make Partial unrolling more useful
1. Add FullUnrollMaxCount option that works like MaxCount, but also limits
   the unroll count for fully unrolled loops. So if a loop has an iteration
   count over this, it won't fully unroll.
2. Add CLI options for MaxCount and the new option, so they can be tested
   (plus a test).
3. Make partial unrolling obey MaxCount.

An example use-case (the out of tree one this is originally designed for) is
a target’s TTI can analyze a loop and decide on a max unroll count separate
from the size threshold, e.g. based on register pressure, then constrain
LoopUnroll to not exceed that, regardless of the size of the unrolled loop.

llvm-svn: 265562
2016-04-06 16:57:25 +00:00
Fiona Glaser
f8a916174c LoopUnroll: only allow non-modulo Partial unrolling when Runtime=true
Patch by Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac@gmail.com>.

llvm-svn: 265558
2016-04-06 16:43:45 +00:00
Silviu Baranga
aab80ed89c Revert r265535 until we know how we can fix the bots
llvm-svn: 265541
2016-04-06 14:06:32 +00:00
Chad Rosier
5672c775e7 Simplify logic. NFC.
llvm-svn: 265537
2016-04-06 13:27:13 +00:00
Silviu Baranga
1fce9f5629 [SCEV] Introduce a guarded backedge taken count and use it in LAA and LV
Summary:
When the backedge taken codition is computed from an icmp, SCEV can
deduce the backedge taken count only if one of the sides of the icmp
is an AddRecExpr. However, due to sign/zero extensions, we sometimes
end up with something that is not an AddRecExpr.

However, we can use SCEV predicates to produce a 'guarded' expression.
This change adds a method to SCEV to get this expression, and the
SCEV predicate associated with it.

In HowManyGreaterThans and HowManyLessThans we will now add a SCEV
predicate associated with the guarded backedge taken count when the
analyzed SCEV expression is not an AddRecExpr. Note that we only do
this as an alternative to returning a 'CouldNotCompute'.

We use new feature in Loop Access Analysis and LoopVectorize to analyze
and transform more loops.

Reviewers: anemet, mzolotukhin, hfinkel, sanjoy

Subscribers: flyingforyou, mcrosier, atrick, mssimpso, sanjoy, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17201

llvm-svn: 265535
2016-04-06 13:18:26 +00:00
Richard Trieu
dcc40dd407 Add parentheses to silence warning.
llvm-svn: 265516
2016-04-06 04:22:00 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
329162bc70 ValueMapper: Fix delayed blockaddress handling after r265273
r265273 added Mapper::mapBlockAddress, which delays mapping a
blockaddress value until the function has a body.  The condition was
backwards, and should be checking Function::empty instead of
GlobalValue::isDeclaration.

llvm-svn: 265508
2016-04-06 02:25:12 +00:00
Sanjoy Das
a79f5c1e6c [RS4GC] Add a comment
llvm-svn: 265503
2016-04-06 01:33:54 +00:00
Sanjoy Das
ec8789a0e2 [RS4GC] NFC cleanup of the DeferredReplacement class
Instead of constructors use clearly named factory methods.

llvm-svn: 265486
2016-04-05 23:18:53 +00:00