Add StackProtector to SafeStack. This adds limited protection against
data corruption in the caller frame. Current implementation treats
all stack protector levels as -fstack-protector-all.
llvm-svn: 266004
This is better for a few reasons:
+ It matches the other tooling for iOS.
+ It matches EABI in more cases (i.e. Thumb-mode, and in practice we don't
use ARM mode).
+ It leads to infinitesimally smaller code (0.2%, yay!).
rdar://25369506
llvm-svn: 266003
xor/and/or (bitcast(A), bitcast(B)) -> bitcast(op (A,B)) was only being combined at the AfterLegalizeTypes stage, this patch permits the combine to occur anytime before then as well.
The main aim with this to improve the ability to recognise bitmasks that can be converted to shuffles.
I had to modify a number of AVX512 mask tests as the basic bitcast to/from scalar pattern was being stripped out, preventing testing of the mmask bitops. By replacing the bitcasts with loads we can get almost the same result.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18944
llvm-svn: 265998
This change follows up defaults for GCC and Clang, so LLVM does not differ
from them. While number of the test files are touched with this change, they
all keep the old (expected) behaviour with the explicit option:
"-relocation-model=pic"
The tests that have not been touched are insensitive to relocation model.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17995
llvm-svn: 265949
This adds a conditional variant of CallBR instruction, CallBCR. Also,
it can be fused with integer comparisons, resulting in one of the new
C*BCall instructions.
In addition to CallBRCL limitations, this has another one: it won't
trigger if the function to call isn't already in %r1 - see f22 in the
test for an example (it's also why the loads in tests are volatile).
Author: koriakin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18928
llvm-svn: 265933
Extend the existing lowering of vXi8 multiplies to support v64i8 on avx512bw targets.
I added the Lower512IntArith helper function to help with this - not sure how often this could be used in the future, but it seemed better than putting all that logic inside LowerMUL.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18937
llvm-svn: 265902
Summary:
After we make the adjustment, we can assume that for local allocas, but
not for stack parameters, the return address, or any other fixed stack
object (which has a negative offset and therefore lies prior to the
adjusted SP).
Fixes PR26662.
Reviewers: hfinkel, qcolombet, rnk
Subscribers: rnk, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18471
llvm-svn: 265886
This patch adds support for decoding XOP VPPERM instruction when it represents a basic shuffle.
The mask decoding required the existing MCInstrLowering code to be updated to support binary shuffles - the implementation now matches what is done in X86InstrComments.cpp.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18441
llvm-svn: 265874
In Memcpy lowering we had missed a dependence from the load of the
operation to successor operations. This causes us to potentially
construct an in initial DAG with a memory dependence not fully
represented in the chain sub-DAG but rather require looking at the
entire DAG breaking alias analysis by allowing incorrect repositioning
of memory operations.
To work around this, r200033 changed DAGCombiner::GatherAllAliases to be
conservative if any possible issues to happen. Unfortunately this check
forbade many non-problematic situations as well. For example, it's
common for incoming argument lowering to add a non-aliasing load hanging
off of EntryNode. Then, if GatherAllAliases visited EntryNode, it would
find that other (unvisited) use of the EntryNode chain, and just give up
entirely. Furthermore, the check was incomplete: it would not actually
detect all such potentially problematic DAG constructions, because
GatherAllAliases did not guarantee to visit all chain nodes going up to
the root EntryNode. This is in general fine -- giving up early will just
miss a potential optimization, not generate incorrect results. But, for
this non-chain dependency detection code, it's possible that you could
have a load attached to a higher-up chain node than any which were
visited. If that load aliases your store, but the only dependency is
through the value operand of a non-aliasing store, it would've been
missed by this code, and potentially reordered.
With the dependence added, this check can be removed and Alias Analysis
can be much more aggressive. This fixes code quality regression in the
Consecutive Store Merge cleanup (D14834).
Test Change:
ppc64-align-long-double.ll now may see multiple serializations
of its stores
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18062
llvm-svn: 265836
This adds a conditional variant of CallJG instruction, CallBRCL.
It can be used for conditional sibling calls. Unfortunately, due
to IfCvt limitations, it only really works well for functions without
arguments.
Author: koriakin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18864
llvm-svn: 265814
Added ISelDAGToDAG functions to enable selection of the smlawb, smlawt,
smulwb and smulwt instructions for the ARM backend. Also updated the smul
CodeGen test and removed the smulw one.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18892
llvm-svn: 265793
It caused PR27275: "ARM: Bad machine code: Using an undefined physical register"
Also reverting the following commits that were landed on top:
r265610 "Fix the compare-clang diff error introduced by r265547."
r265639 "Fix the sanitizer bootstrap error in r265547."
r265657 "InlineSpiller.cpp: Escap \@ in r265547. [-Wdocumentation]"
llvm-svn: 265790
This is the same change on PPC64 as r255821 on AArch64. I have even borrowed
his commit message.
The access function has a short entry and a short exit, the initialization
block is only run the first time. To improve the performance, we want to
have a short frame at the entry and exit.
We explicitly handle most of the CSRs via copies. Only the CSRs that are not
handled via copies will be in CSR_SaveList.
Frame lowering and prologue/epilogue insertion will generate a short frame
in the entry and exit according to CSR_SaveList. The majority of the CSRs will
be handled by register allcoator. Register allocator will try to spill and
reload them in the initialization block.
We add CSRsViaCopy, it will be explicitly handled during lowering.
1> we first set FunctionLoweringInfo->SplitCSR if conditions are met (the target
supports it for the given machine function and the function has only return
exits). We also call TLI->initializeSplitCSR to perform initialization.
2> we call TLI->insertCopiesSplitCSR to insert copies from CSRsViaCopy to
virtual registers at beginning of the entry block and copies from virtual
registers to CSRsViaCopy at beginning of the exit blocks.
3> we also need to make sure the explicit copies will not be eliminated.
Author: Tom Jablin (tjablin)
Reviewers: hfinkel kbarton cycheng
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17533
llvm-svn: 265781
It seems that llc cannot be called used in assembler tests so test that
checks asm for particular target needs to be moved to codegen.
llvm-svn: 265770
Summary:
EHPad BB are not entered the classic way and therefor do not need to be placed after their predecessors. This patch make sure EHPad BB are not chosen amongst successors to form chains, and are selected as last resort when selecting the best candidate.
EHPad are scheduled in reverse probability order in order to have them flow into each others naturally.
Reviewers: chandlerc, majnemer, rafael, MatzeB, escha, silvas
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17625
llvm-svn: 265726
Standard load/store instructions with GLC bit set.
Reviewers: tstellardAMD, arsenm
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18760
llvm-svn: 265709
Return is now considered a predicable instruction, and is converted
to a newly-added CondReturn (which maps to BCR to %r14) instruction by
the if conversion pass.
Also, fused compare-and-branch transform knows about conditional
returns, emitting the proper fused instructions for them.
This transform triggers on a *lot* of tests, hence the huge diffstat.
The changes are mostly jX to br %r14 -> bXr %r14.
Author: koriakin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17339
llvm-svn: 265689
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18562
A large number of testcases has been modified so they pass after this test.
One testcase is deleted, because I realized even after undoing the original
change that was committed with this testcase, the testcase still passes. So
I removed it. The change to one other testcase (test/CodeGen/PowerPC/pr25802.ll)
is an arbitrary change to keep it passing. Given the original intention of the
testcase, and the fact that fixing it will require some time to change the testcase,
we concluded that this quick change will be enough.
llvm-svn: 265683
Re-apply r265450 which caused PR27245 and was reverted in r265559
because of a wrong generalization: the fetch_and_add->add_and_fetch
combine only works in specific, but pretty common, cases:
(icmp slt x, 0) -> (icmp sle (add x, 1), 0)
(icmp sge x, 0) -> (icmp sgt (add x, 1), 0)
(icmp sle x, 0) -> (icmp slt (sub x, 1), 0)
(icmp sgt x, 0) -> (icmp sge (sub x, 1), 0)
Original Message:
We only generate LOCKed versions of add/sub when the result is unused.
It often happens that the result is used, but only by a comparison. We
can optimize those out by reusing EFLAGS, which lets us use the proper
instructions, instead of having to fallback to LXADD.
Instead of doing this as an MI peephole (as we do for the other
non-LOCKed (really, non-MR) forms), do it in ISel. It becomes quite
tricky later.
This also makes it eventually possible to stop expanding and/or/xor
if the only user is an icmp (also see D18141).
This uses the LOCK ISD opcodes added by r262244.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17633
llvm-svn: 265636
Third time's the charm? The previous attempt (r265345) caused ASan test
failures on X86, as broken CFI caused stack traces to not work.
This version of the patch makes sure not to merge with stack adjustments
that have CFI, and to not add merged instructions' offests to the CFI
about to be generated.
This is already covered by the lit tests; I just got the expectations
wrong previously.
llvm-svn: 265623
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18405
When the integer value loaded is never used directly as integer we should use VSX
or Floating Point Facility integer loads and avoid extra direct move
llvm-svn: 265593
This makes it possible to distinguish between mesa shaders
and other kernels even in the presence of compute shaders.
Patch By: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18559
llvm-svn: 265589
