A seemingly common use for the walker's getClobberingMemoryAccess
function is:
```
MemoryAccess *getClobber(MemorySSAWalker *W, MemoryUseOrDef *MUD) {
const Instruction *I = MUD->getMemoryInst();
return W->getClobberingMemoryAccess(I);
}
```
Which is kind of redundant, since walkers will ultimately query MSSA to
find out which MemoryAccess `I` maps to (...which is always `MUD`).
So, this patch adds an overload of getClobberingMemoryAccess that
accepts MemoryAccesses directly. As a result, the Instruction overload
of getClobberingMemoryAccess becomes a lightweight wrapper around our
new overload.
Additionally, this patch un`virtual`izes the Instruction overload of
getClobberingMemoryAccess, since there doesn't seem to be a walker that
benefits from that being virtual, and I can't think of how else one
would implement it. Happy to make it virtual again if we would benefit
from doing so.
llvm-svn: 276169
This patch updates MemorySSA's use-optimizing walker to be more
accurate and, in some cases, faster.
Essentially, this changed our core walking algorithm from a
cache-as-you-go DFS to an iteratively expanded DFS, with all of the
caching happening at the end. Said expansion happens when we hit a Phi,
P; we'll try to do the smallest amount of work possible to see if
optimizing above that Phi is legal in the first place. If so, we'll
expand the search to see if we can optimize to the next phi, etc.
An iteratively expanded DFS lets us potentially quit earlier (because we
don't assume that we can optimize above all phis) than our old walker.
Additionally, because we don't cache as we go, we can now optimize above
loops.
As an added bonus, this patch adds a ton of verification (if
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS are enabled), so finding bugs is easier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21777
llvm-svn: 275940
Calling getModRefInfo with a fence resulted in crashes because fences
don't have a memory location. Add a new predicate to Instruction
called isFenceLike which indicates that the instruction mutates memory
but not any single memory location in particular. In practice, it is a
proxy for the set of instructions which "mayWriteToMemory" but cannot be
used with MemoryLocation::get.
This fixes PR28570.
llvm-svn: 275581
This patch moves MSSA's caching walker into MemorySSA, and moves the
actual definition of MSSA's caching walker out of MemorySSA.h. This is
done in preparation for the new walker, which should be out for review
soonish.
Also, this patch removes a field from UpwardsMemoryQuery and has a few
lines of diff from clang-format'ing MemorySSA.cpp.
llvm-svn: 273723
A memory access defined on function entry cannot be locally dominated by another memory access.
The patch was split from http://reviews.llvm.org/D19338 which exposes the problem.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21039
llvm-svn: 272436
Add support for the new pass manager to MemorySSA pass.
Change MemorySSA to be computed eagerly upon construction.
Change MemorySSAWalker to be owned by the MemorySSA object that creates
it.
Reviewers: dberlin, george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19664
llvm-svn: 271432
It turns out that too many passes are relying on alias analysis results
for control dependencies. Until we fix that by introducing a more accurate
modelling of control dependencies, special case assume in MemorySSA instead.
Also introduce tests to ensure we don't regress the FunctionAttrs or LICM
passes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20658
llvm-svn: 270823
There is only one caller of MemorySSA::createNewAccess, and it passes true
as the IgnoreNonMemory argument. Remove that argument and fold its behavior
into createNewAccess.
llvm-svn: 270812
This patch fixes two somewhat related bugs in MemorySSA's caching
walker. These bugs were found because D19695 brought up the problem
that we'd have defs cached to themselves, which is incorrect.
The bugs this fixes are:
- We would sometimes skip the nearest clobber of a MemoryAccess, because
we would query our cache for a given potential clobber before
checking if the potential clobber is the clobber we're looking for.
The cache entry for the potential clobber would point to the nearest
clobber *of the potential clobber*, so if that was a cache hit, we'd
ignore the potential clobber entirely.
- There are times (sometimes in DFS, sometimes in the getClobbering...
functions) where we would insert cache entries that say a def
clobbers itself.
There's a bit of common code between the fixes for the bugs, so they
aren't split out into multiple commits.
This patch also adds a few unit tests, and refactors existing tests a
bit to reduce the duplication of setup code.
llvm-svn: 268087
Summary:
Historically, we had a switch in the Makefiles for turning on "expensive
checks". This has never been ported to the cmake build, but the
(dead-ish) code is still around.
This will also make it easier to turn it on in buildbots.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: jyknight, mzolotukhin, RKSimon, gberry, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19723
llvm-svn: 268050
Summary:
CachingMemorySSAWalker::invalidateInfo was using IsCall to determine
which cache map needed to be cleared of entries referring to the invalidated
MemoryAccess, but there could also be entries referring to it in the
other cache map (value entries, not key entries). This change just
clears both tables to be conservatively correct.
Also add a verifyRemoved() function, called when expensive
checks (i.e. XDEBUG) are enabled to verify that the invalidated
MemoryAccess object is not referenced in any of the caches.
Reviewers: dberlin, george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19388
llvm-svn: 267157
Summary:
Need to use predecessors for reverse graph, successors for forward graph.
succ_iterator/pred_iterator are not compatible, this patch is all the work necessary to work around that (which is what everywhere else does). Not sure if there is a better way, so cc'ing some random folks to take a gander :)
Reviewers: dblaikie, qcolombet, echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18796
llvm-svn: 266718
Removed some unused headers, replaced some headers with forward class declarations.
Found using simple scripts like this one:
clear && ack --cpp -l '#include "llvm/ADT/IndexedMap.h"' | xargs grep -L 'IndexedMap[<]' | xargs grep -n --color=auto 'IndexedMap'
Patch by Eugene Kosov <claprix@yandex.ru>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19219
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266595
Prior to this patch, the MemorySSA caching visitor would cache all
calls that it visited. When paired with phi optimization, this can be
problematic. Consider:
define void @foo() {
; 1 = MemoryDef(liveOnEntry)
call void @clobberFunction()
br i1 undef, label %if.end, label %if.then
if.then:
; MemoryUse(??)
call void @readOnlyFunction()
; 2 = MemoryDef(1)
call void @clobberFunction()
br label %if.end
if.end:
; 3 = MemoryPhi(...)
; MemoryUse(?)
call void @readOnlyFunction()
ret void
}
When optimizing MemoryUse(?), we visit defs 1 and 2, so we note to
cache them later. We ultimately end up not being able to optimize
passed the Phi, so we set MemoryUse(?) to point to the Phi. We then
cache the clobbering call for def 1 to be the Phi.
This commit changes this behavior so that we wipe out any calls
added to VisistedCalls while visiting the defs of a phi we couldn't
optimize.
Aside: With this patch, we now can bootstrap clang/LLVM without a
single MemorySSA verifier failure. Woohoo. :)
llvm-svn: 264820
This patch teaches the caching MemorySSA walker a few things:
1. Not to walk Phis we've walked before. It seems that we tried to do
this before, but it didn't work so well in cases like:
define void @foo() {
%1 = alloca i8
%2 = alloca i8
br label %begin
begin:
; 3 = MemoryPhi({%0,liveOnEntry},{%end,2})
; 1 = MemoryDef(3)
store i8 0, i8* %2
br label %end
end:
; MemoryUse(?)
load i8, i8* %1
; 2 = MemoryDef(1)
store i8 0, i8* %2
br label %begin
}
Because we wouldn't put Phis in Q.Visited until we tried to visit them.
So, when trying to optimize MemoryUse(?):
- We would visit 3 above
- ...Which would make us put {%0,liveOnEntry} in Q.Visited
- ...Which would make us visit {%0,liveOnEntry}
- ...Which would make us put {%end,2} in Q.Visited
- ...Which would make us visit {%end,2}
- ...Which would make us visit 3
- ...Which would realize we've already visited everything in 3
- ...Which would make us conservatively return 3.
In the added test-case, (@looped_visitedonlyonce) this behavior would
cause us to give incorrect results. Specifically, we'd visit 4 twice
in the same query, but on the second visit, we'd skip while.cond because
it had been visited, visit if.then/if.then2, and cache "1" as the
clobbering def on the way back.
2. If we try to walk the defs of a {Phi,MemLoc} and see it has been
visited before, just hand back the Phi we're trying to optimize.
I promise this isn't as terrible as it seems. :)
We now insert {Phi,MemLoc} pairs just before walking the Phi's upward
defs. So, we check the cache for the {Phi,MemLoc} pair before checking
if we've already walked the Phi.
The {Phi,MemLoc} pair is (almost?) always guaranteed to have a cache
entry if we've already fully walked it, because we cache as we go.
So, if the {Phi,MemLoc} pair isn't in cache, either:
(a) we must be in the process of visiting it (in which case, we can't
give a better answer in a cache-as-we-go DFS walker)
(b) we visited it, but didn't cache it on the way back (...which seems
to require `ModifyingAccess` to not dominate `StartingAccess`,
so I'm 99% sure that would be an error. If it's not an error, I
haven't been able to get it to happen locally, so I suspect it's
rare.)
- - - - -
As a consequence of this change, we no longer skip upward defs of phis,
so we can kill the `VisitedOnlyOne` check. This gives us better accuracy
than we had before, at the cost of potentially doing a bit more work
when we have a loop.
llvm-svn: 264814
There are a few bugs in the walker that this patch addresses.
Primarily:
- Caching can break when we have multiple BBs without phis
- We weren't optimizing some phis properly
- Because of how the DFS iterator works, there were times where we
wouldn't cache any results of our DFS
I left the test cases with FIXMEs in, because I'm not sure how much
effort it will take to get those to work (read: We'll probably
ultimately have to end up redoing the walker, or we'll have to come up
with some creative caching tricks), and more test coverage = better.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18065
llvm-svn: 264180
If we have a BB with only MemoryDefs, live-in calculations will ignore
it. This means we get results like this:
define void @foo(i8* %p) {
; 1 = MemoryDef(liveOnEntry)
store i8 0, i8* %p
br i1 undef, label %if.then, label %if.end
if.then:
; 2 = MemoryDef(1)
store i8 1, i8* %p
br label %if.end
if.end:
; 3 = MemoryDef(1)
store i8 2, i8* %p
ret void
}
...When there should be a MemoryPhi in the `if.end` BB.
This patch fixes that behavior.
llvm-svn: 263991
Summary:
This adds the beginning of an update API to preserve MemorySSA. In particular,
this patch adds a way to remove memory SSA accesses when instructions are
deleted.
It also adds relevant unit testing infrastructure for MemorySSA's API.
(There is an actual user of this API, i will make that diff dependent on this one. In practice, a ton of opt passes remove memory instructions, so it's hopefully an obviously useful API :P)
Reviewers: hfinkel, reames, george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17157
llvm-svn: 262362
Please see include/llvm/Transforms/Utils/MemorySSA.h for a description
of MemorySSA, and what it does.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7864
llvm-svn: 259595
