We need to propagate this information from the IR in order to be able to safely
do tail call optimizations on the intrinsics during legalization. Assuming
it's safe to do tail call opt without checking for the marker isn't safe because
the mem libcall may use allocas from the caller.
This adds an extra immediate operand to the end of the intrinsics and fixes the
legalizer to handle it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68151
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@373140 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Register and changes the type of the
variable to llvm::Register (dropping the llvm:: where possible).
Partial reverts in:
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FixupLEAs.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
HexagonBitSimplify.cpp - Function takes BitTracker::RegisterRef which appears to be unsigned&
MachineVerifier.cpp - Ambiguous operator==() given MCRegister and const Register
PPCFastISel.cpp - No Register::operator-=()
PeepholeOptimizer.cpp - TargetInstrInfo::optimizeLoadInstr() takes an unsigned&
MachineTraceMetrics.cpp - MachineTraceMetrics lacks a suitable constructor
Manual fixups in:
ARMFastISel.cpp - ARMEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
HexagonSplitDouble.cpp - Ternary operator was ambiguous between unsigned/Register
HexagonConstExtenders.cpp - Has a local class named Register, used llvm::Register instead of Register.
PPCFastISel.cpp - PPCEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
Depends on D65919
Reviewers: arsenm, bogner, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: RKSimon, craig.topper, lenary, aemerson, wuzish, jholewinski, MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, tpr, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@369041 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently shufflemasks get emitted as any other constant, and you end
up with a bunch of virtual registers of G_CONSTANT with a
G_BUILD_VECTOR. The AArch64 selector then asserts on anything that
doesn't fit this pattern. This isn't an ideal representation, and
should avoid legalization and have fewer opportunities for a
representational error.
Rather than invent a new shuffle mask operand type, similar to what
ShuffleVectorSDNode does, just track the original IR Constant mask
operand. I don't completely like the idea of adding another link to
the IR, but MIR is already quite dependent on IR constants already,
and this will allow sharing the shuffle mask utility functions with
the IR.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@368704 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Targets often have instructions that can sign-extend certain cases faster
than the equivalent shift-left/arithmetic-shift-right. Such cases can be
identified by matching a shift-left/shift-right pair but there are some
issues with this in the context of combines. For example, suppose you can
sign-extend 8-bit up to 32-bit with a target extend instruction.
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24 # (I've inlined the G_CONSTANT for brevity)
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 24
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2:_(s32), i32 1
would reasonably combine to:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 25
which no longer matches the special case. If your shifts and extend are
equal cost, this would break even as a pair of shifts but if your shift is
more expensive than the extend then it's cheaper as:
%2:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG %0:_(s32), i32 8
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2:_(s32), i32 1
It's possible to match the shift-pair in ISel and emit an extend and ashr.
However, this is far from the only way to break this shift pair and make
it hard to match the extends. Another example is that with the right
known-zeros, this:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 24
%3:_(s32) = G_MUL %2:_(s32), i32 2
can become:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 23
All upstream targets have been configured to lower it to the current
G_SHL,G_ASHR pair but will likely want to make it legal in some cases to
handle their faster cases.
To follow-up: Provide a way to legalize based on the constant. At the
moment, I'm thinking that the best way to achieve this is to provide the
MI in LegalityQuery but that opens the door to breaking core principles
of the legalizer (legality is not context sensitive). That said, it's
worth noting that looking at other instructions and acting on that
information doesn't violate this principle in itself. It's only a
violation if, at the end of legalization, a pass that checks legality
without being able to see the context would say an instruction might not be
legal. That's a fairly subtle distinction so to give a concrete example,
saying %2 in:
%1 = G_CONSTANT 16
%2 = G_SEXT_INREG %0, %1
is legal is in violation of that principle if the legality of %2 depends
on %1 being constant and/or being 16. However, legalizing to either:
%2 = G_SEXT_INREG %0, 16
or:
%1 = G_CONSTANT 16
%2:_(s32) = G_SHL %0, %1
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2, %1
depending on whether %1 is constant and 16 does not violate that principle
since both outputs are genuinely legal.
Reviewers: bogner, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, aemerson, paquette, arsenm
Subscribers: sdardis, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61289
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@368487 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This allows targets to make more decisions about reserved registers
after isel. For example, now it should be certain there are calls or
stack objects in the frame or not, which could have been introduced by
legalization.
Patch by Matthias Braun
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@363757 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I keep using the wrong instruction when manually writing tests. This
really needs to check the number of operands, but I don't see an easy
way to do that right now.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@363579 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a branch opcode that takes a jump table pointer, jump table index and an
index into the table to do an indirect branch.
We pass both the table pointer and JTI to allow targets like ARM64 to more
easily use the existing jump table compression optimization without having to
walk up the block to find a paired G_JUMP_TABLE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63159
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@363434 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This opcode generates a pointer to the address of the jump table
specified by the source operand, which is a jump table index.
It will be used in conjunction with an upcoming G_BRJT opcode to support
jump table codegen with GlobalISel.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63111
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@363096 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Testing based on the total size of the elements failed to catch a few
invalid scenarios, so explicitly check the number of elements/operands
and types.
This failed to catch situations like
<4 x s16> = G_BUILD_VECTOR s32, s32 since the total size added
up. This also would fail to catch an implicit conversion between
pointers and scalars.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@354139 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A number of of tests were using imm operands, not cimm. Since CSE
relies on the exact ConstantInt* pointer used, and implicit
conversions are generally evil, also enforce the bitsize of the types.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@353113 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Factor the common vector element consistency check many instructions
need out, although this makes the error messages worse.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@353112 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I expected this to be automatically verified, but it seems
nothing uses that the type index was declared as a "ptype"
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@352319 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@351636 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch adds a convenience report() method for physical registers and
uses it to print the offending register with the 'MBB has allocatable
live-in' error.
Reviewers: MatzeB, rtereshin, dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55946
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@350630 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch restricts the capability of G_MERGE_VALUES, and uses the new
G_BUILD_VECTOR and G_CONCAT_VECTORS opcodes instead in the appropriate places.
This patch also includes AArch64 support for selecting G_BUILD_VECTOR of <4 x s32>
and <2 x s64> vectors.
Differential Revisions: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53629
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@348788 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These opcodes are intended to subsume some of the capability of G_MERGE_VALUES,
as it was too powerful and thus complex to add deal with throughout the GISel
pipeline.
G_BUILD_VECTOR creates a vector value from a sequence of uniformly typed
scalar values. G_BUILD_VECTOR_TRUNC is a special opcode for handling scalar
operands which are larger than the destination vector element type, and
therefore does an implicit truncate.
G_CONCAT_VECTOR creates a vector by concatenating smaller, uniformly typed,
vectors together.
These will be used in a subsequent commit. This commit just adds the initial
infrastructure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53594
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@348430 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If present, PHI nodes must appear before non-PHI nodes in a basic block. The
register allocator relies on this and will fail to eliminate PHI's that do not
meet this requirement.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@343731 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-verify-machineinstrs inserts the MachineVerifier after every MachineInstr-based
pass. However, GlobalISel creates MachineInstr-based passes earlier than DAGISel
and the corresponding verifiers are not being added. This patch fixes that.
If GlobalISel triggers the fallback path then the MIR can be left in a bad
state that is going to be cleared by ResetMachineFunctions. In this situation
verifying between GlobalISel passes will prevent the fallback path from
recovering from this. As a result, we bail out of verifying a function if the
FailedISel attribute is present.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@343613 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Consider an instruction that has multiple defs of the same
vreg, but defining different subregs:
%7.sub1:rc, dead %7.sub2:rc = inst
Calling checkLivenessAtDef for the live interval associated
with %7 incorrectly reported "live range continues after a
dead def". The live range for %7 has a dead def at the slot
index for "inst" even if the live range continues (given that
there are later uses of %7.sub1).
This patch adjusts MachineVerifier::checkLivenessAtDef
to allow dead subregister definitions, unless we are checking
a subrange (when tracking subregister liveness).
A limitation is that we do not detect the situation when the
live range continues past an instruction that defines the
full virtual register by multiple dead subreg defines.
I also removed some dead code related to physical register
in checkLivenessAtDef. Wwe only call that method for virtual
registers, so I added an assertion instead.
Reviewers: kparzysz
Reviewed By: kparzysz
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52237
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342618 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If the liveness of a physical register was invalid, this
was attempting to iterate the subregisters of all register
uses of the instruction, which would assert when it
encountered an implicit virtual register operand.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340763 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Each use of a value should be jointly dominated by the union of defs and
undefs. It can happen that it will only be jointly dominated by undefs,
and that is still legal. Make sure that the verifier is aware of that.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@339924 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
In some cases, these operands lacked the IsDebug property, which is meant to signal that
they should not affect codegen. This patch adds a check for this property in the
MachineVerifier and adds it where it was missing.
This includes refactorings to use MachineInstrBuilder construction functions instead of
manually setting up the intrinsic everywhere.
Patch by: JesperAntonsson
Reviewers: aprantl, rnk, echristo, javed.absar
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: qcolombet, sdardis, nemanjai, JDevlieghere, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48319
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@335214 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
- Add wasm personality function
- Re-categorize the existing `isFuncletEHPersonality()` function into
two different functions: `isFuncletEHPersonality()` and
`isScopedEHPersonality(). This becomes necessary as wasm EH uses scoped
EH instructions (catchswitch, catchpad/ret, and cleanuppad/ret) but not
outlined funclets.
- Changed some callsites of `isFuncletEHPersonality()` to
`isScopedEHPersonality()` if they are related to scoped EH IR-level
stuff.
Reviewers: majnemer, dschuff, rnk
Subscribers: jfb, sbc100, jgravelle-google, eraman, JDevlieghere, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45559
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@332667 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Because we create a new kind of debug instruction, DBG_LABEL, we need to
check all passes which use isDebugValue() to check MachineInstr is debug
instruction or not. When expelling debug instructions, we should expel
both DBG_VALUE and DBG_LABEL. So, I create a new function,
isDebugInstr(), in MachineInstr to check whether the MachineInstr is
debug instruction or not.
This patch has no new test case. I have run regression test and there is
no difference in regression test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45342
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@331844 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
