In the Atom model the symbols, content and relocations of a relocatable object
file are represented as a graph of atoms, where each Atom represents a
contiguous block of content with a single name (or no name at all if the
content is anonymous), and where edges between Atoms represent relocations.
If more than one symbol is associated with a contiguous block of content then
the content is broken into multiple atoms and layout constraints (represented by
edges) are introduced to ensure that the content remains effectively contiguous.
These layout constraints must be kept in mind when examining the content
associated with a symbol (it may be spread over multiple atoms) or when applying
certain relocation types (e.g. MachO subtractors).
This patch replaces the Atom model in JITLink with a blocks-and-symbols model.
The blocks-and-symbols model represents relocatable object files as bipartite
graphs, with one set of nodes representing contiguous content (Blocks) and
another representing named or anonymous locations (Symbols) within a Block.
Relocations are represented as edges from Blocks to Symbols. This scheme
removes layout constraints (simplifying handling of MachO alt-entry symbols,
and hopefully ELF sections at some point in the future) and simplifies some
relocation logic.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@373689 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If content sections have lower alignment than zero-fill sections then bump the
overall segment alignment to avoid under-aligning the zero-fill sections.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@370072 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously we had only honored alignments on individual atoms, but
tools/runtimes may assume that the section alignment is respected too.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@360555 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch modifies MachOAtomGraphBuilder to use setLayoutNext rather than
addEdge, and fixes a bug in the section layout algorithm that could result in
atoms appearing more than once in the section ordering (which resulted in those
atoms being assigned invalid addresses during layout).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@360205 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
JITLinkGeneric phases 2 and 3 (focused on applying fixups and finalizing memory,
respectively) may fail for various reasons. If this happens, we need to
explicitly de-allocate the memory allocated in phase 1 (explicitly, because
deallocation may also fail and so is implemented as a method returning error).
No testcase yet: I am still trying to decide on the right way to test totally
platform agnostic code like this.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@359643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld:
it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target
process.
JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways:
(1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling.
RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and
this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in
RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more
difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate
format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code.
(2) Support for native code models.
RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external
functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its
restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows
arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be
added naturally.
(3) Native support for asynchronous linking.
JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these
callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the
linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent
ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if
asynchrony is not needed.
To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code:
(1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and
| memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures.
|
+ -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to
| atom-graph parsing.
|
+ -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g.
JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation
support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph.
To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for
these operations take continuations as arguments:
using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation =
std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>;
using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction =
std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols,
JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>;
using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>;
virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize);
In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements:
- Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR
definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process
(In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions,
but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory).
- Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive
eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many
eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on.
- More extensive validation and error handling throughout.
This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for
other architectures and formats will happen in-tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@358818 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
