This header includes CodeGen headers, and is not, itself, included by
any Target headers, so move it into CodeGen to match the layering of its
implementation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@317647 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The generic dag combiner will fold:
(shl (add x, c1), c2) -> (add (shl x, c2), c1 << c2)
(shl (or x, c1), c2) -> (or (shl x, c2), c1 << c2)
This can create constants which are too large to use as an immediate.
Many ALU operations are also able of performing the shl, so we can
unfold the transformation to prevent a mov imm instruction from being
generated.
Other patterns, such as b + ((a << 1) | 510), can also be simplified
in the same manner.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38084
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@317197 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As far as I can tell, this matches gcc: -mfloat-abi determines the
calling convention for all functions except those explicitly defined as
soft-float in the ARM RTABI.
This change only affects cases where the user specifies -mfloat-abi to
override the default calling convention derived from the target triple.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=34530.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38299
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316708 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This adds some more debug messages to the type legalizer and functions
like PromoteNode, ExpandNode, ExpandLibCall in an attempt to make
the debug messages a little bit more informative and useful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38450
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@314773 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I implemented isTruncateFree in rL313533, this patch fixes the logic
to match my comment, as the previous logic was too general. Now the
only truncates that are free are i64 -> i32.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38234
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@314280 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a preparatory step for D34515.
This change:
- makes nodes ISD::ADDCARRY and ISD::SUBCARRY legal for i32
- lowering is done by first converting the boolean value into the carry flag
using (_, C) ← (ARMISD::ADDC R, -1) and converted back to an integer value
using (R, _) ← (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C). An ARMISD::ADDE between the two
operations does the actual addition.
- for subtraction, given that ISD::SUBCARRY second result is actually a
borrow, we need to invert the value of the second operand and result before
and after using ARMISD::SUBE. We need to invert the carry result of
ARMISD::SUBE to preserve the semantics.
- given that the generic combiner may lower ISD::ADDCARRY and
ISD::SUBCARRYinto ISD::UADDO and ISD::USUBO we need to update their lowering
as well otherwise i64 operations now would require branches. This implies
updating the corresponding test for unsigned.
- add new combiner to remove the redundant conversions from/to carry flags
to/from boolean values (ARMISD::ADDC (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C), -1) → C
- fixes PR34045
- fixes PR34564
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35192
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@313618 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This was causing PR34045 to fire again.
> This is a preparatory step for D34515 and also is being recommitted as its
> first version caused PR34045.
>
> This change:
> - makes nodes ISD::ADDCARRY and ISD::SUBCARRY legal for i32
> - lowering is done by first converting the boolean value into the carry flag
> using (_, C) ← (ARMISD::ADDC R, -1) and converted back to an integer value
> using (R, _) ← (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C). An ARMISD::ADDE between the two
> operations does the actual addition.
> - for subtraction, given that ISD::SUBCARRY second result is actually a
> borrow, we need to invert the value of the second operand and result before
> and after using ARMISD::SUBE. We need to invert the carry result of
> ARMISD::SUBE to preserve the semantics.
> - given that the generic combiner may lower ISD::ADDCARRY and
> ISD::SUBCARRYinto ISD::UADDO and ISD::USUBO we need to update their lowering
> as well otherwise i64 operations now would require branches. This implies
> updating the corresponding test for unsigned.
> - add new combiner to remove the redundant conversions from/to carry flags
> to/from boolean values (ARMISD::ADDC (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C), -1) → C
> - fixes PR34045
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35192
Also revert follow-up r313010:
> [ARM] Fix typo when creating ISD::SUB nodes
>
> In D35192, I accidentally introduced a typo when creating ISD::SUB nodes,
> giving them two values instead of one.
>
> This fails when the merge_values combiner finds one of these nodes.
>
> This change fixes PR34564.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37690
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@313044 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In D35192, I accidentally introduced a typo when creating ISD::SUB nodes,
giving them two values instead of one.
This fails when the merge_values combiner finds one of these nodes.
This change fixes PR34564.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37690
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@313010 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a preparatory step for D34515 and also is being recommitted as its
first version caused PR34045.
This change:
- makes nodes ISD::ADDCARRY and ISD::SUBCARRY legal for i32
- lowering is done by first converting the boolean value into the carry flag
using (_, C) ← (ARMISD::ADDC R, -1) and converted back to an integer value
using (R, _) ← (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C). An ARMISD::ADDE between the two
operations does the actual addition.
- for subtraction, given that ISD::SUBCARRY second result is actually a
borrow, we need to invert the value of the second operand and result before
and after using ARMISD::SUBE. We need to invert the carry result of
ARMISD::SUBE to preserve the semantics.
- given that the generic combiner may lower ISD::ADDCARRY and
ISD::SUBCARRYinto ISD::UADDO and ISD::USUBO we need to update their lowering
as well otherwise i64 operations now would require branches. This implies
updating the corresponding test for unsigned.
- add new combiner to remove the redundant conversions from/to carry flags
to/from boolean values (ARMISD::ADDC (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C), -1) → C
- fixes PR34045
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35192
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@313009 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It caused PR34564.
> This is a preparatory step for D34515 and also is being recommitted as its
> first version caused PR34045.
>
> This change:
> - makes nodes ISD::ADDCARRY and ISD::SUBCARRY legal for i32
> - lowering is done by first converting the boolean value into the carry flag
> using (_, C) ← (ARMISD::ADDC R, -1) and converted back to an integer value
> using (R, _) ← (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C). An ARMISD::ADDE between the two
> operations does the actual addition.
> - for subtraction, given that ISD::SUBCARRY second result is actually a
> borrow, we need to invert the value of the second operand and result before
> and after using ARMISD::SUBE. We need to invert the carry result of
> ARMISD::SUBE to preserve the semantics.
> - given that the generic combiner may lower ISD::ADDCARRY and
> ISD::SUBCARRYinto ISD::UADDO and ISD::USUBO we need to update their lowering
> as well otherwise i64 operations now would require branches. This implies
> updating the corresponding test for unsigned.
> - add new combiner to remove the redundant conversions from/to carry flags
> to/from boolean values (ARMISD::ADDC (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C), -1) → C
> - fixes PR34045
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35192
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@312980 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a preparatory step for D34515 and also is being recommitted as its
first version caused PR34045.
This change:
- makes nodes ISD::ADDCARRY and ISD::SUBCARRY legal for i32
- lowering is done by first converting the boolean value into the carry flag
using (_, C) ← (ARMISD::ADDC R, -1) and converted back to an integer value
using (R, _) ← (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C). An ARMISD::ADDE between the two
operations does the actual addition.
- for subtraction, given that ISD::SUBCARRY second result is actually a
borrow, we need to invert the value of the second operand and result before
and after using ARMISD::SUBE. We need to invert the carry result of
ARMISD::SUBE to preserve the semantics.
- given that the generic combiner may lower ISD::ADDCARRY and
ISD::SUBCARRYinto ISD::UADDO and ISD::USUBO we need to update their lowering
as well otherwise i64 operations now would require branches. This implies
updating the corresponding test for unsigned.
- add new combiner to remove the redundant conversions from/to carry flags
to/from boolean values (ARMISD::ADDC (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C), -1) → C
- fixes PR34045
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35192
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@312898 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This exposes the isReadOnly(GlobalValue *) in the ARMTargetLowering so
we can make use of it in GlobalISel as well.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@312320 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The calling convention can be specified by the user in IR. Failing to support
a particular calling convention isn't a programming error, and so relying on
llvm_unreachable to catch and report an unsupported calling convention is not
appropriate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36830
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@311435 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the exact same fix as in SVN r247254. In that commit, the fix was
applied only for isVTRNMask and isVTRN_v_undef_Mask, but the same issue
is present for VZIP/VUZP as well.
This fixes PR33921.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36899
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@311258 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When lowering a VLA, we emit a __chstk call. However, this call can
internally clobber CPSR. We did not mark this register as an ImpDef,
which could potentially allow a comparison to be hoisted above the call
to `__chkstk`. In such a case, the CPSR could be clobbered, and the
check invalidated. When the support was initially added, it seemed that
the call would take care of preventing CPSR from being clobbered, but
this is not the case. Mark the register as clobbered to fix a possible
state corruption.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@311061 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Without the SrcVT its hard to know what is really being asked for. For example if your target has 128, 256, and 512 bit vectors. Maybe extracting 128 from 256 is cheap, but maybe extracting 128 from 512 is not.
For x86 we do support extracting a quarter of a 512-bit register. But for i1 vectors we don't have isel patterns for extracting arbitrary pieces. So we need this to have a correct implementation of isExtractSubvectorCheap for mask vectors.
Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, efriedma
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36649
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@310793 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch:
- makes nodes ISD::ADDCARRY and ISD::SUBCARRY legal for i32
- lowering is done by first converting the boolean value into the carry flag
using (_, C) <- (ARMISD::ADDC R, -1) and converted back to an integer value
using (R, _) <- (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C). An ARMISD::ADDE between the two
operations does the actual addition.
- for subtraction, given that ISD::SUBCARRY second result is actually a
borrow, we need to invert the value of the second operand and result before
and after using ARMISD::SUBE. We need to invert the carry result of
ARMISD::SUBE to preserve the semantics.
- given that the generic combiner may lower ISD::ADDCARRY and
ISD::SUBCARRY into ISD::UADDO and ISD::USUBO we need to update their lowering
as well otherwise i64 operations now would require branches. This implies
updating the corresponding test for unsigned.
- add new combiner to remove the redundant conversions from/to carry flags
to/from boolean values (ARMISD::ADDC (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C), -1) -> C
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35192
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309923 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
IMHO it is an antipattern to have a enum value that is Default.
At any given piece of code it is not clear if we have to handle
Default or if has already been mapped to a concrete value. In this
case in particular, only the target can do the mapping and it is nice
to make sure it is always done.
This deletes the two default enum values of CodeModel and uses an
explicit Optional<CodeModel> when it is possible that it is
unspecified.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309911 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Changing mask argument type from const SmallVectorImpl<int>& to
ArrayRef<int>.
This came up in D35700 where a mask is received as an ArrayRef<int> and
we want to pass it to TargetLowering::isShuffleMaskLegal().
Also saves a few lines of code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309085 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch makes LSR generate better code for SystemZ in the cases of memory
intrinsics, Load->Store pairs or comparison of immediate with memory.
In order to achieve this, the following common code changes were made:
* New TTI hook: LSRWithInstrQueries(), which defaults to false. Controls if
LSR should do instruction-based addressing evaluations by calling
isLegalAddressingMode() with the Instruction pointers.
* In LoopStrengthReduce: handle address operands of memset, memmove and memcpy
as address uses, and call isFoldableMemAccessOffset() for any LSRUse::Address,
not just loads or stores.
SystemZ changes:
* isLSRCostLess() implemented with Insns first, and without ImmCost.
* New function supportedAddressingMode() that is a helper for TTI methods
looking at Instructions passed via pointers.
Review: Ulrich Weigand, Quentin Colombet
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35262https://reviews.llvm.org/D35049
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@308729 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
OpenCL 2.0 introduces the notion of memory scopes in atomic operations to
global and local memory. These scopes restrict how synchronization is
achieved, which can result in improved performance.
This change extends existing notion of synchronization scopes in LLVM to
support arbitrary scopes expressed as target-specific strings, in addition to
the already defined scopes (single thread, system).
The LLVM IR and MIR syntax for expressing synchronization scopes has changed
to use *syncscope("<scope>")*, where <scope> can be "singlethread" (this
replaces *singlethread* keyword), or a target-specific name. As before, if
the scope is not specified, it defaults to CrossThread/System scope.
Implementation details:
- Mapping from synchronization scope name/string to synchronization scope id
is stored in LLVM context;
- CrossThread/System and SingleThread scopes are pre-defined to efficiently
check for known scopes without comparing strings;
- Synchronization scope names are stored in SYNC_SCOPE_NAMES_BLOCK in
the bitcode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21723
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@307722 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
r306334 fixed a bug in AArch64 dealing with wide interleaved accesses having
pointer types. The bug also exists in ARM, so this patch copies over the fix.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@307409 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
On big-endian machines the high and low parts of the value accessed by ldrexd
and strexd are swapped around. To account for this we swap inputs and outputs
in ISelLowering.
Patch by Bharathi Seshadri.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@306865 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Resubmission of r305387, which was reverted at r305390. The Address
Sanitizer caught a stack-use-after-scope of a Twine variable. This
is now fixed by passing the Twine directly as a function parameter.
The ARM backend asserts against constant pool lowering when it generates
execute-only code in order to prevent the generation of constant pools in
the text section. It appears that target independent optimizations might
generate DAG nodes that represent constant pools. By lowering such nodes
as global addresses we don't violate the semantics of execute-only code
and also it is guaranteed that execute-only behaves correct with the
position-independent addressing modes that support execute-only code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33773
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@305776 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit 3a204faa09.
I've upset a buildbot which runs the address sanitizer:
ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-scope
lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp:2690
That Twine variable is used illegally.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@305390 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The ARM backend asserts against constant pool lowering when it generates
execute-only code in order to prevent the generation of constant pools in
the text section. It appears that target independent optimizations might
generate DAG nodes that represent constant pools. By lowering such nodes
as global addresses we don't violate the semantics of execute-only code
and also it is guaranteed that execute-only behaves correct with the
position-independent addressing modes that support execute-only code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33773
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@305387 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@304787 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Currently FPOWI defaults to Legal and LegalizeDAG.cpp turns Legal into Expand for this opcode because Legal is a "lie".
This patch changes the default for this opcode to Expand and removes the hack from LegalizeDAG.cpp. It also removes all the code in the targets that set this opcode to Expand themselves since they can just rely on the default.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, efriedma
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: jfb, dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, nemanjai, javed.absar, andrew.w.kaylor, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33530
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@304215 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently getOptimalMemOpType returns i32 for large enough sizes without
checking for alignment, leading to poor code generation when misaligned accesses
aren't permitted as we generate a word store then later split it up into byte
stores. This means we inadvertantly go over the MaxStoresPerMemcpy limit and for
memset we splat the memset value into a word then immediately split it up
again.
Fix this by leaving it up to FindOptimalMemOpLowering to figure out which type
to use, but also fix a bug there where it wasn't correctly checking if
misaligned memory accesses are allowed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33442
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303990 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
A temporary workaround for PR32780 - rematerialized instructions accessing the same promoted global through different constant pool entries.
The patch turns off the globals promotion optimization leaving all its code in place, so that it can be easily turned on once PR32780 is fixed.
Since this is a miscompilation issue causing generation of misbehaving code, and the problem is very subtle, the patch might be valuable enough to get into 4.0.1.
Reviewers: efriedma, jmolloy
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: aemerson, javed.absar, llvm-commits, rengolin, asl, tstellar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33446
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303679 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Now both emitLeadingFence and emitTrailingFence take the instruction
itself, instead of taking IsLoad/IsStore pairs.
Instruction::mayReadFromMemory and Instrucion::mayWriteToMemory are used
for determining those two booleans.
The instruction argument is also useful for later D32763, in
emitTrailingFence. For emitLeadingFence, it seems to have cleaner
interface with the proposed change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32762
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@302539 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Using arguments with attribute inalloca creates problems for verification
of machine representation. This attribute instructs the backend that the
argument is prepared in stack prior to CALLSEQ_START..CALLSEQ_END
sequence (see http://llvm.org/docs/InAlloca.htm for details). Frame size
stored in CALLSEQ_START in this case does not count the size of this
argument. However CALLSEQ_END still keeps total frame size, as caller can
be responsible for cleanup of entire frame. So CALLSEQ_START and
CALLSEQ_END keep different frame size and the difference is treated by
MachineVerifier as stack error. Currently there is no way to distinguish
this case from actual errors.
This patch adds additional argument to CALLSEQ_START and its
target-specific counterparts to keep size of stack that is set up prior to
the call frame sequence. This argument allows MachineVerifier to calculate
actual frame size associated with frame setup instruction and correctly
process the case of inalloca arguments.
The changes made by the patch are:
- Frame setup instructions get the second mandatory argument. It
affects all targets that use frame pseudo instructions and touched many
files although the changes are uniform.
- Access to frame properties are implemented using special instructions
rather than calls getOperand(N).getImm(). For X86 and ARM such
replacement was made previously.
- Changes that reflect appearance of additional argument of frame setup
instruction. These involve proper instruction initialization and
methods that access instruction arguments.
- MachineVerifier retrieves frame size using method, which reports sum of
frame parts initialized inside frame instruction pair and outside it.
The patch implements approach proposed by Quentin Colombet in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27481#c1.
It fixes 9 tests failed with machine verifier enabled and listed
in PR27481.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32394
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@302527 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The separated libcalls are implemented in terms of __divmodsi4 and __udivmodsi4
anyway, so we should always use them if possible.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@302462 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This exposes a method in MachineFrameInfo that calculates
MaxCallFrameSize and calls it after instruction selection in the ARM
target.
This avoids
ARMBaseRegisterInfo::canRealignStack()/ARMFrameLowering::hasReservedCallFrame()
giving different answers in early/late phases of codegen.
The testcase shows a particular nasty example result of that where we
would fail to properly align an alloca.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32622
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@302303 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
