The loop idiom creating a ConstantRange is repeated twice in the
codebase, time to give it a name and a home.
The loop is also repeated in `rangeMetadataExcludesValue`, but using
`getConstantRangeFromMetadata` there would not be an NFC -- the range
returned by `getConstantRangeFromMetadata` may contain a value that none
of the subranges did.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251180 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Instead of checking `(FlagsPresent & ExpectedFlags) != 0`, check
`(FlagsPresent & ExpectedFlags) == ExpectedFlags`. Right now they're
equivalent since `ExpectedFlags` can only be either `FlagNUW` or
`FlagNSW`, but if we ever pass in `ExpectedFlags` as `FlagNUW | FlagNSW`
then checking `(FlagsPresent & ExpectedFlags) != 0` would be wrong.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251142 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I could not come up a way to test this -- I think this bug is latent
today, and will not actually result in a miscompile.
In `getPreStartForExtend`, SCEV constructs `PreStart` as a sum of all of
`SA`'s operands except `Op`. It also uses `SA`'s no-wrap flags, and
this is problematic because removing an element from an add expression
can make it signed-wrap. E.g. if `SA` was `(127 + 1 + -1)`, then it
could safely be `<nsw>` (since `sext(127) + sext(1) + sext(-1)` ==
`sext(127 + 1 + -1)`), but `(127 + 1)` (== `PreStart` if `Op` is `-1`)
is not `<nsw>`.
Transferring `<nuw>` from `SA` to `PreStart` is safe, as far as I can
tell.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251097 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
An unsigned comparision is equivalent to is corresponding signed version
if both the operands being compared are positive. Teach SCEV to use
this fact when profitable.
Reviewers: atrick, hfinkel, reames, nlewycky
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13687
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251051 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
- A s< (A + C)<nsw> if C > 0
- A s<= (A + C)<nsw> if C >= 0
- (A + C)<nsw> s< A if C < 0
- (A + C)<nsw> s<= A if C <= 0
Right now `C` needs to be a constant, but we can later generalize it to
be a non-constant if needed.
Reviewers: atrick, hfinkel, reames, nlewycky
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13686
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251050 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This uses `ScalarEvolution::getRange` and not potentially control
dependent `nsw` and `nuw` bits on the arithmetic instruction.
Reviewers: atrick, hfinkel, nlewycky
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13613
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251048 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In a later commit, `SplitBinaryAdd` will be used outside `IsConstDiff`,
so lift that out. And lift out `IsConstDiff` as
`computeConstantDifference` to keep things clean and to avoid playing
C++ access specifier games.
NFC.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@250143 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch also allows the -delinearize pass to delinearize expressions that do
not have an outermost SCEVAddRec expression. The SCEV::delinearize
infrastructure allowed this since r240952, but the -delinearize pass was not
updated yet.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@250018 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The current implementation of `StrengthenNoWrapFlags` is agnostic to the
order of `Ops`, so this commit should not change anything semantic. An
upcoming change will make `StrengthenNoWrapFlags` sensitive to the order
of `Ops`.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@249802 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
`getConstantEvolutionLoopExitValue` and `ComputeExitCountExhaustively`
assumed all phi nodes in the loop header have the same order of incoming
values. This is not correct, and this commit changes
`getConstantEvolutionLoopExitValue` and `ComputeExitCountExhaustively`
to lookup the backedge value of a phi node using the loop's latch block.
Unfortunately, there is still some code duplication
`getConstantEvolutionLoopExitValue` and `ComputeExitCountExhaustively`.
At some point in the future we should extract out a helper class /
method that can evolve constant evolution phi nodes across iterations.
Fixes 25060. Thanks to Mattias Eriksson for the spot-on analysis!
Depends on D13457.
Reviewers: atrick, hfinkel
Subscribers: materi, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13458
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@249712 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Comparing `Pred` with `ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT` is cheaper that memory access
-- do that check before loading / storing `ProvingSplitPredicate`.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@249654 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
With this patch, clang -O3 optimizes correctly providing > 1000x speedup on this artificial benchmark):
for (a=0; a<n; a++)
for (b=0; b<n; b++)
for (c=0; c<n; c++)
for (d=0; d<n; d++)
for (e=0; e<n; e++)
for (f=0; f<n; f++)
x++;
From test-suite/SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/nestedloop.c
Reviewers: sanjoyd
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13390
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@249431 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This time by lifting the lambda's in `createNodeFromSelectLikePHI` to
the file scope. Looks like there are differences in capture rules
between clang and MSVC?
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@249222 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This change teaches SCEV that to prove `A u< B` it is sufficient to
prove each of these facts individually:
- B >= 0
- A s< B
- A >= 0
In practice, SCEV sometimes finds it easier to prove these facts
individually than to prove `A u< B` as one atomic step.
Reviewers: reames, atrick, nlewycky, hfinkel
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13042
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@249168 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
`ScalarEvolution::isImpliedCondOperandsViaNoOverflow` tries to cast the
operand type of the comparison it is given to an `IntegerType`. This is
incorrect because it could actually be simplifying a comparison between
two pointers. Switch it to using `getTypeSizeInBits` instead, which
does the right thing for both pointers and integers.
Fixed PR24956.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@248743 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Before this change `HasSameValue` would return true for distinct
`alloca` instructions if they happened to be allocating the same
type (`alloca` instructions are not specified as reading memory). This
change adds an explicit whitelist of instruction types for which
"identical" instructions compute the same value.
Fixes PR24952.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@248690 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
If the trip count of a specific backedge is `N`, then we know that
backedge is effectively guarded by the condition `{0,+,1} u< N`. This
change teaches SCEV to use this condition to prove things in
`isLoopBackedgeGuardedByCond`.
Depends on D12948
Depends on D12949
The original checkin, r248608 had to be backed out due to an issue with
a ObjCXX unit test. That issue is now fixed, so re-landing.
Reviewers: atrick, reames, majnemer, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12950
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@248638 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This change teaches SCEV's `isImpliedCond` two new identities:
A u< B u< -C => (A + C) u< (B + C)
A s< B s< INT_MIN - C => (A + C) s< (B + C)
While these are useful on their own, they're really intended to support
D12950.
The original checkin, r248606 had to be backed out due to an issue with
a ObjCXX unit test. That issue is now fixed, so re-landing.
Reviewers: atrick, reames, majnemer, nlewycky, hfinkel
Subscribers: aadg, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12948
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@248637 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
If the trip count of a specific backedge is `N`, then we know that
backedge is effectively guarded by the condition `{0,+,1} u< N`. This
change teaches SCEV to use this condition to prove things in
`isLoopBackedgeGuardedByCond`.
Depends on D12948
Depends on D12949
Reviewers: atrick, reames, majnemer, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12950
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@248608 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This change teaches SCEV's `isImpliedCond` two new identities:
A u< B u< -C => (A + C) u< (B + C)
A s< B s< INT_MIN - C => (A + C) s< (B + C)
While these are useful on their own, they're really intended to support
D12950.
Reviewers: atrick, reames, majnemer, nlewycky, hfinkel
Subscribers: aadg, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12948
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@248606 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
It is fairly common to call SE->getConstant(Ty, 0) or
SE->getConstant(Ty, 1); this change makes such uses a little bit
briefer.
I've refactored the call sites I could find easily to use getZero /
getOne.
Reviewers: hfinkel, majnemer, reames
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12947
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@248362 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
`ClearWalkingBEDominatingCondsOnExit` is exactly `SaveAndRestore<bool>`,
so use `SaveAndRestore<bool>` instead.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@248227 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
For loop destroyed current instance before invoking next.
Temporary variable added to prevent use-after-dtor when invoke
destructor on current instance.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12912
Rename temp var.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@247867 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch addresses the issue of SCEV division asserting on some
input expressions (e.g., non-affine expressions) and quietly giving
up on others. When giving up, we set the quotient to be equal to
zero and the remainder to be equal to the numerator. With this
patch, we always quietly give up when we cannot perform the
division.
This patch also adds a test case for DependenceAnalysis that
previously caused an assertion.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11725
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@247314 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
PR24757 was caused by some incorect math in
`ScalarEvolution::HowFarToZero` -- the smallest unsigned solution for X
in
2^N * A = 2^N * X
is not necessarily A.
Reviewers: atrick, majnemer, meheff
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12721
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@247242 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Rewrite some code to not use a lambda function. The non-lambda code is just
about as clean as the original, and not any longer. The lambda function causes
an internal compiler error in GCC 4.8.0, and it is not worth breaking support
for that compiler over this. NFC.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@245466 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Here we make ScalarEvolution::isKnownPredicate, indirectly, a little smarter.
Given some relational comparison operator OP, and two AddRec SCEVs, {I,+,S} OP
{J,+,T}, we can reduce this to the comparison I OP J when S == T, both AddRecs
are for the same loop, and both are known not to wrap.
As it turns out, because of the way that backedge-guard expressions can be
leveraged when computing known predicates, this allows indvars to simplify the
if-statement comparison in this loop:
void foo (int *a, int *b, int n) {
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
if (i > n)
a[i] = b[i] + 1;
}
}
which, somewhat surprisingly, we were not previously optimizing away.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@245400 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
