As discussed on D28777 - we don't need to handle 'all element' shuffles inside InstCombiner::visitCallInst as InstCombiner::SimplifyDemandedVectorElts will do everything we need.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@292365 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add missing fabs(fpext) optimzation that worked with the call,
and also fixes it creating a second fpext when there were multiple
uses.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@292172 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It's not clear what 'First' and 'Second' mean, so use 'Inner' and 'Outer'
to match foldShiftedShift() and add comments with formulas, so it's easier
to see what's going on.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@292153 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a function's CFG when that CFG is unchanged.
This allows transformation passes to simply claim they preserve the CFG
and analysis passes to check for the CFG being preserved to remove the
fanout of all analyses being listed in all passes.
I've gone through and removed or cleaned up as many of the comments
reminding us to do this as I could.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28627
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@292054 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
mark it as never invalidated in the new PM.
The old PM already required this to work, and after a discussion with
Hal this seems to really be the only sensible answer. The cache
gracefully degrades as the IR is mutated, and most things which do this
should already be incrementally updating the cache.
This gets rid of a bunch of logic preserving and testing the
invalidation of this analysis.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@292039 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
cover domtree and alias analysis. These are the pretty clear analyses
that we would always want to survive this pass.
To make these survive, we also need to preserve the assumption cache.
Added a test that verifies the important bits of this preservation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@292037 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Allows LLVM to optimize sequences like the following:
%add = add nuw i32 %x, 1
%cmp = icmp ugt i32 %add, %y
Into:
%cmp = icmp uge i32 %x, %y
Previously, only signed comparisons were being handled.
Decrements could also be handled, but 'sub nuw %x, 1' is currently canonicalized to
'add %x, -1' in InstCombineAddSub, losing the nuw flag. Removing that canonicalization
seems like it might have far-reaching ramifications so I kept this simple for now.
Patch by Matti Niemenmaa!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24700
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@291975 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Here's my second try at making @llvm.assume processing more efficient. My
previous attempt, which leveraged operand bundles, r289755, didn't end up
working: it did make assume processing more efficient but eliminating the
assumption cache made ephemeral value computation too expensive. This is a
more-targeted change. We'll keep the assumption cache, but extend it to keep a
map of affected values (i.e. values about which an assumption might provide
some information) to the corresponding assumption intrinsics. This allows
ValueTracking and LVI to find assumptions relevant to the value being queried
without scanning all assumptions in the function. The fact that ValueTracking
started doing O(number of assumptions in the function) work, for every
known-bits query, has become prohibitively expensive in some cases.
As discussed during the review, this is a pragmatic fix that, longer term, will
likely be replaced by a more-principled solution (perhaps based on an extended
SSA form).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28459
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@291671 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Some of the callers are artificially limiting this transform to integer types;
this should make it easier to incrementally remove that restriction.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@291620 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We can perform the following:
(add (zext (add nuw X, C1)), C2) -> (zext (add nuw X, C1+C2))
This is only possible if C2 is negative and C2 is greater than or equal to negative C1.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290927 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I wrote this patch before seeing the comment in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27114
...that suggests we should actually be canonicalizing the other way.
So just in case we decide this is the right way, we might as well
have a cleaner implementation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290912 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We correctly canonicalized (add (sext x), (sext y)) to (sext (add x, y))
where possible. However, we didn't perform the same canonicalization
for zexts or for muls.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290733 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
