This can prove that:
extern int f;
int g() {
int x = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < 365; ++i) {
x /= f;
}
return x;
}
always returns zero. Thanks to Sanjoy for confirming this
transformation actually made sense (bugs are mine).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@292531 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The motivating example is:
extern int patatino;
int goo() {
int x = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; ++i) {
x *= patatino;
}
return x;
}
Currently SCCP will not realize that this function returns always zero,
therefore will try to unroll and vectorize the loop at -O3 producing an
awful lot of (useless) code. With this change, it will just produce:
0000000000000000 <g>:
xor %eax,%eax
retq
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289175 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently SCCP folds the value to -1, while ConstantProp folds to
0. This changes SCCP to do what ConstantFolding does.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289147 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There are two cases handled here:
1) a branch on undef
2) a switch with an undef condition.
Both cases are currently handled by ResolvedUndefsIn. If we have
a branch on undef, we force its value to false (which is trivially
foldable). If we have a switch on undef, we force to the first
constant (which is also foldable).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@288725 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We visit and/or, we try to derive a lattice value for the
instruction even if one of the operands is overdefined.
If the non-overdefined value is still 'unknown' just return and wait
for ResolvedUndefsIn to "plug in" the correct value. This simplifies
the logic a bit. While I'm here add tests for missing cases.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@287709 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I'm not sure if the `!isa<CallInst>(Inst) &&
!isa<TerminatorInst>(Inst))` bit is correct either, but this fixes the
case we know is broken.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@279647 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Besides a general consistently benefit, the extra layer of indirection
allows the mechanical part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23256 that
requires touching every transformation and analysis to be factored out
cleanly.
Thanks to David for the suggestion.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@278078 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Besides a general consistently benefit, the extra layer of indirection
allows the mechanical part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23256 that
requires touching every transformation and analysis to be factored out
cleanly.
Thanks to David for the suggestion.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@278077 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I've been hitting those already while working on SCCP and I think
it's be useful to provide a more explanatory diagnostic.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@276007 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
.. enough to cause LTO compile time to regress insanely.
Thanks *a lot* to Rafael for reporting the problem and testing
the fix!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@275468 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The code was pretty much copy-pasted between SCCP and IPSCCP. The situation
became clearly worse after I introduced the support for folding structs in
SCCP. This commit is NFC as we currently (still) skip the replacement
step in IPSCCP, but I'll change this soon.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@275339 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This code was already commented out and it made some weird assumptions,
e.g. using isUndefined() as "this value is UndefValue" instead of
"we haven't computed this value is yet". Thanks to Eli Friedman for
pointing out where I was wrong (and where this code was wrong).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@274995 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
SimplifyCFG had logic to insert calls to llvm.trap for two very
particular IR patterns: stores and invokes of undef/null.
While InstCombine canonicalizes certain undefined behavior IR patterns
to stores of undef, phase ordering means that this cannot be relied upon
in general.
There are much better tools than llvm.trap: UBSan and ASan.
N.B. I could be argued into reverting this change if a clear argument as
to why it is important that we synthesize llvm.trap for stores, I'd be
hard pressed to see why it'd be useful for invokes...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@273778 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass is a dependency of
SCCP but it's not listed as such. Chandler pointed
out this is an easy mistake to make which only
surfaces in weird crashes with some flag combinations.
This code will go away anyway at some point in the
future, but as long as it's (still) exercised, try
to make it correct.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@269589 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Shifts beyond the bitwidth are undef but SCCP resolved them to zero.
Instead, DTRT and resolve them to undef.
This reimplements the transform which caused PR27712.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@269269 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch implements a optimization bisect feature, which will allow optimizations to be selectively disabled at compile time in order to track down test failures that are caused by incorrect optimizations.
The bisection is enabled using a new command line option (-opt-bisect-limit). Individual passes that may be skipped call the OptBisect object (via an LLVMContext) to see if they should be skipped based on the bisect limit. A finer level of control (disabling individual transformations) can be managed through an addition OptBisect method, but this is not yet used.
The skip checking in this implementation is based on (and replaces) the skipOptnoneFunction check. Where that check was being called, a new call has been inserted in its place which checks the bisect limit and the optnone attribute. A new function call has been added for module and SCC passes that behaves in a similar way.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@267022 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Fixes PR26774.
If you're aware of the issue, feel free to skip the "Motivation"
section and jump directly to "This patch".
Motivation:
I define "refinement" as discarding behaviors from a program that the
optimizer has license to discard. So transforming:
```
void f(unsigned x) {
unsigned t = 5 / x;
(void)t;
}
```
to
```
void f(unsigned x) { }
```
is refinement, since the behavior went from "if x == 0 then undefined
else nothing" to "nothing" (the optimizer has license to discard
undefined behavior).
Refinement is a fundamental aspect of many mid-level optimizations done
by LLVM. For instance, transforming `x == (x + 1)` to `false` also
involves refinement since the expression's value went from "if x is
`undef` then { `true` or `false` } else { `false` }" to "`false`" (by
definition, the optimizer has license to fold `undef` to any non-`undef`
value).
Unfortunately, refinement implies that the optimizer cannot assume
that the implementation of a function it can see has all of the
behavior an unoptimized or a differently optimized version of the same
function can have. This is a problem for functions with comdat
linkage, where a function can be replaced by an unoptimized or a
differently optimized version of the same source level function.
For instance, FunctionAttrs cannot assume a comdat function is
actually `readnone` even if it does not have any loads or stores in
it; since there may have been loads and stores in the "original
function" that were refined out in the currently visible variant, and
at the link step the linker may in fact choose an implementation with
a load or a store. As an example, consider a function that does two
atomic loads from the same memory location, and writes to memory only
if the two values are not equal. The optimizer is allowed to refine
this function by first CSE'ing the two loads, and the folding the
comparision to always report that the two values are equal. Such a
refined variant will look like it is `readonly`. However, the
unoptimized version of the function can still write to memory (since
the two loads //can// result in different values), and selecting the
unoptimized version at link time will retroactively invalidate
transforms we may have done under the assumption that the function
does not write to memory.
Note: this is not just a problem with atomics or with linking
differently optimized object files. See PR26774 for more realistic
examples that involved neither.
This patch:
This change introduces a new set of linkage types, predicated as
`GlobalValue::mayBeDerefined` that returns true if the linkage type
allows a function to be replaced by a differently optimized variant at
link time. It then changes a set of IPO passes to bail out if they see
such a function.
Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel, dexonsmith, joker.eph, rnk
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18634
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@265762 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
