I was surprised to see the code model being passed to MC. After all,
it assembles code, it doesn't create it.
The one place it is used is in the expansion of .cfi directives to
handle .eh_frame being more that 2gb away from the code.
As far as I can tell, gnu assembler doesn't even have an option to
enable this. Compiling a c file with gcc -mcmodel=large produces a
regular looking .eh_frame. This is probably because in practice linker
parse and recreate .eh_frames.
In llvm this is used because the JIT can place the code and .eh_frame
very far apart. Ideally we would fix the jit and delete this
option. This is hard.
Apart from confusion another problem with the current interface is
that most callers pass CodeModel::Default, which is bad since MC has
no way to map it to the target default if it actually needed to.
This patch then replaces the argument with a boolean with a default
value. The vast majority of users don't ever need to look at it. In
fact, only CodeGen and llvm-mc use it and llvm-mc just to enable more
testing.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309884 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Followup to r309570, fixing it slightly differently (ranges_base and
addr_base should never be read from a DWO file - so there shouldn't be
any issue with 'overriding' the values - conditionalize the code and
assert that the values aren't being overriden).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309879 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch makes LoopDeletion use the incremental DominatorTree API.
We modify LoopDeletion to perform the deletion in 5 steps:
1. Create a new dummy edge from the preheader to the exit, by adding a conditional branch.
2. Inform the DomTree about the new edge.
3. Remove the conditional branch and replace it with an unconditional edge to the exit. This removes the edge to the loop header, making it unreachable.
4. Inform the DomTree about the deleted edge.
5. Remove the unreachable block from the function.
Creating the dummy conditional branch is necessary to perform incremental DomTree update.
We should consider using the batch updater when it's ready.
Reviewers: dberlin, davide, grosser, sanjoy
Reviewed By: dberlin, grosser
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35391
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309850 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This should enable us to test the generation of target-specific constant
pools, e.g. for ARM:
constants:
- id: 0
value: 'g(GOT_PREL)-(LPC0+8-.)'
alignment: 4
isTargetSpecific: true
I intend to use this to test PIC support in GlobalISel for ARM.
This is difficult to test outside of that context, since the existing
MIR tests usually rely on parser support as well, and that seems a bit
trickier to add. We could try to add a unit test, but the setup for that
seems rather convoluted and overkill.
We do test however that the parser reports a nice error when
encountering a target-specific constant pool.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36092
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309806 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Fix a bug discovered in an out-of-tree target where memoperands from
pseudo-instructions that weren't part of the match were being merged into the
result instructions as part of GIR_MergeMemOperands.
This bug was caused by a change to the handling of State.MIs between rules when
the state machine tables were fused into a single table. Previously, each rule
would reset State.MIs using State.MIs.resize(1) but this is no longer done, as a
result stale data is occasionally left in some elements of State.MIs. Most
opcodes aren't affected by this but GIR_MergeMemOperands merges all memoperands
from the intructions recorded in State.MIs into the result instruction.
Suppose for example, we processed but rejected the following pattern:
(signextend (load x))
at this point, State.MIs contains the signextend and the load. Now suppose we
process and accept this pattern:
(add x, y)
at this point, State.MIs contains the add as well as the (now irrelevant) load.
When GIR_MergeMemOperands is processed, the memoperands from that irrelevant
load will be merged into the result instruction even though it was not part of
the match.
Bringing back the State.MIs.resize(1) would fix the problem but it would limit
our ability to optimize the table in the future. Instead, this patch fixes the
problem by explicitly stating which instructions should be merged into the result.
There's no direct test case in this commit because a test case would be very brittle.
However, at the time of writing this should fix the failures in
http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/Compiler_Verifiers_GlobalISEL/ as well as a
failure in test/CodeGen/ARM/GlobalISel/arm-isel.ll when expensive checks are enabled.
Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar
Subscribers: fhahn, kristof.beyls, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36094
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309804 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
infinite-inlining across multiple runs of the inliner by keeping a tiny
history of internal-to-SCC inlining decisions.
This is still a bit gross, but I don't yet have any fundamentally better
ideas and numerous people are blocked on this to use new PM and ThinLTO
together.
The core of the idea is to detect when we are about to do an inline that
has a chance of re-splitting an SCC which we have split before with
a similar inlining step. That is a critical component in the inlining
forming a cycle and so far detects all of the various cyclic patterns
I can come up with as well as the original real-world test case (which
comes from a ThinLTO build of libunwind).
I've added some tests that I think really demonstrate what is going on
here. They are essentially state machines that march the inliner through
various steps of a cycle and check that we stop when the cycle is closed
and that we actually did do inlining to form that cycle.
A lot of thanks go to Eric Christopher and Sanjoy Das for the help
understanding this issue and improving the test cases.
The biggest "yuck" here is the layering issue -- the CGSCC pass manager
is providing somewhat magical state to the inliner for it to use to make
itself converge. This isn't great, but I don't honestly have a lot of
better ideas yet and at least seems nicely isolated.
I have tested this patch, and it doesn't block *any* inlining on the
entire LLVM test suite and SPEC, so it seems sufficiently narrowly
targeted to the issue at hand.
We have come up with hypothetical issues that this patch doesn't cover,
but so far none of them are practical and we don't have a viable
solution yet that covers the hypothetical stuff, so proceeding here in
the interim. Definitely an area that we will be back and revisiting in
the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36188
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309784 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In the last half-dozen commits to LLVM I removed code that became dead
after removing the offset parameter from llvm.dbg.value gradually
proceeding from IR towards the backend. Before I can move on to
DwarfDebug and friends there is one last side-called offset I need to
remove: This patch modifies PrologEpilogInserter's use of the
DBG_VALUE's offset argument to use a DIExpression instead. Because the
PrologEpilogInserter runs at the Machine level I had to play a little
trick with a named llvm.dbg.mir node to get the DIExpressions to print
in MIR dumps (which print the llvm::Module followed by the
MachineFunction dump).
I also had to add rudimentary DwarfExpression support to CodeView and
as a side-effect also fixed a bug (CodeViewDebug::collectVariableInfo
was supposed to give up on variables with complex DIExpressions, but
would fail to do so for fragments, which are also modeled as
DIExpressions).
With this last holdover removed we will have only one canonical way of
representing offsets to debug locations which will simplify the code
in DwarfDebug (and future versions of CodeViewDebug once it starts
handling more complex expressions) and make it easier to reason about.
This patch is NFC-ish: All test case changes are for assembler
comments and the binary output does not change.
rdar://problem/33580047
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36125
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309751 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The coverage tool needs to know which slice to look at when it's handed
a universal binary. Some projects need to look at aggregate coverage
reports for a variety of slices in different binaries: this patch adds
support for these kinds of projects to llvm-cov.
rdar://problem/33579007
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309747 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Pretty sure this will automatically promoted to match the type of the other operand of the subtract. There's plenty of other similar code around here without this cast.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309653 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Stack coloring pass need to maintain AliasAnalysis information when merging stack slots of different types.
Actually, there is a FIXME comment in StackColoring.cpp
// FIXME: In order to enable the use of TBAA when using AA in CodeGen,
// we'll also need to update the TBAA nodes in MMOs with values
// derived from the merged allocas.
But, TBAA has been already enabled in CodeGen without fixing this pass.
The incorrect TBAA metadata results in recent failures in bootstrap test on ppc64le (PR33928) by allowing unsafe instruction scheduling.
Although we observed the problem on ppc64le, this is a platform neutral issue.
This patch makes the stack coloring pass maintains AliasAnalysis information when merging multiple stack slots.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309651 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Adding part of the changes in D30369 (needed to make progress):
Current patch updates AliasAnalysis and MemoryLocation, but does _not_ clean up MemorySSA.
Original summary from D30369, by dberlin:
Currently, we have instructions which affect memory but have no memory
location. If you call, for example, MemoryLocation::get on a fence,
it asserts. This means things specifically have to avoid that. It
also means we end up with a copy of each API, one taking a memory
location, one not.
This starts to fix that.
We add MemoryLocation::getOrNone as a new call, and reimplement the
old asserting version in terms of it.
We make MemoryLocation optional in the (Instruction, MemoryLocation)
version of getModRefInfo, and kill the old one argument version in
favor of passing None (it had one caller). Now both can handle fences
because you can just use MemoryLocation::getOrNone on an instruction
and it will return a correct answer.
We use all this to clean up part of MemorySSA that had to handle this difference.
Note that literally every actual getModRefInfo interface we have could be made private and replaced with:
getModRefInfo(Instruction, Optional<MemoryLocation>)
and
getModRefInfo(Instruction, Optional<MemoryLocation>, Instruction, Optional<MemoryLocation>)
and delegating to the right ones, if we wanted to.
I have not attempted to do this yet.
Reviewers: dberlin, davide, dblaikie
Subscribers: sanjoy, hfinkel, chandlerc, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35441
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309641 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch refactors the code used in llc such that all the users of the
addPassesToEmitFile API have access to a homogeneous way of handling
start/stop-after/before options right out of the box.
In particular, just invoking addPassesToEmitFile will set the proper
pipeline without additional effort (modulo parsing a .mir file if the
start-before/after options are used.
NFC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30913
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309599 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I was a bit lazy when I first implemented this & skipped the index
lookup - obviously for large files this becomes pretty crucial, so here
we go, do the index lookup. Speeds up large DWP symbolizing by... lots.
(20m -> 20s, actually, maybe more in a release build (that was a release
build without index lookup, compared to a debug/non-release build with
the index usage))
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309507 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Committed in r309498 I didn't spot where the rest of the private members
were in DWARFContext at the time - group them up again.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309506 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If you've archived the DWP file somewhere it's probably useful to be
able to just tell llvm-symbolizer where it is when you're symbolizing
stack traces from the binary.
This only provides a mechanism for specifying a single DWP file, good if
you're symbolizing a program with a single DWP file, but it's likely if
the program is dynamically linked that you might have a DWP for each
dynamic library - in which case this feature won't help (at least as
it's surfaced in llvm-symbolizer for now) - in theory it could be
extended to specify a collection of DWP files that could all be
consulted for split CU hash resolution.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309498 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Now that SamplePGOSupport is part of PGOOpt, there are several places that need tweaking:
1. AddDiscriminator pass should *not* be invoked at ThinLTOBackend (as it's already invoked in the PreLink phase)
2. addPGOInstrPasses should only be invoked when either ProfileGenFile or ProfileUseFile is non-empty.
3. SampleProfileLoaderPass should only be invoked when SampleProfileFile is non-empty.
4. PGOIndirectCallPromotion should only be invoked in ProfileUse phase, or in ThinLTOBackend of SamplePGO.
Reviewers: chandlerc, tejohnson, davidxl
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: sanjoy, mehdi_amini, eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36040
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309478 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit
- Removes IsTailCall and replaces it with a target-defined unsigned
- Refactors getOutliningCallOverhead and getOutliningFrameOverhead so that they don't use IsTailCall
- Adds a call class + frame class classification to OutlinedFunction and Candidate respectively
This accomplishes a couple things.
Firstly, we don't need the notion of *tail call* in the general outlining algorithm.
Secondly, we now can have different "outlining classes" for each candidate within a set of candidates.
This will make it easy to add new ways to outline sequences for certain targets and dynamically choose
an appropriate cost model for a sequence depending on the context that that sequence lives in.
Ultimately, this should get us closer to being able to do something like, say avoid saving the link
register when outlining AArch64 instructions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309475 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This diff removes the second argument of the method MachOObjectFile::exports.
In all in-tree uses this argument is equal to "this" and
without this argument the interface seems to be cleaner.
Test plan: make check-all
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309462 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There is no situation where this rarely-used argument cannot be
substituted with a DIExpression and removing it allows us to simplify
the DWARF backend. Note that this patch does not yet remove any of
the newly dead code.
rdar://problem/33580047
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35951
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309426 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Recommit after workaround the bug PR31652.
Three bugs fixed in previous recommits: The first one is to use CurrentBlock
instead of PREInstr's Parent as param of performScalarPREInsertion because
the Parent of a clone instruction may be uninitialized. The second one is stop
PRE when CurrentBlock to its predecessor is a backedge and an operand of CurInst
is defined inside of CurrentBlock. The same value defined inside of loop in last
iteration can not be regarded as available. The third one is an out-of-bound
array access in a flipped if guard.
Right now scalarpre doesn't have phi-translate support, so it will miss some
simple pre opportunities. Like the following testcase, current scalarpre cannot
recognize the last "a * b" is fully redundent because a and b used by the last
"a * b" expr are both defined by phis.
long a[100], b[100], g1, g2, g3;
__attribute__((pure)) long goo();
void foo(long a, long b, long c, long d) {
g1 = a * b;
if (__builtin_expect(g2 > 3, 0)) {
a = c;
b = d;
g2 = a * b;
}
g3 = a * b; // fully redundant.
}
The patch adds phi-translate support in scalarpre. This is only a temporary
solution before the newpre based on newgvn is available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32252
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309397 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This adds support for the CFI pseudo-op return_column. This specifies
the frame table column which contains the return address.
Addresses PR33953!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309360 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r309080. The patch needs to clear out the
ScalarEvolution::ExitLimits cache in forgetMemoizedResults.
I've replied on the commit thread for the patch with more details.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309357 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is some more cleanup in preparation for some actual
functional changes. This splits getOutliningBenefit into
two cost functions: getOutliningCallOverhead and
getOutliningFrameOverhead. These functions return the
number of instructions that would be required to call
a specific function and the number of instructions
that would be required to construct a frame for a
specific funtion. The actual outlining benefit logic
is moved into the outliner, which calls these functions.
The goal of refactoring getOutliningBenefit is to:
- Get us closer to getting rid of the IsTailCall flag
- Further split up "target-specific" things and
"general algorithm" things
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309356 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This can come up in ThinLTO & wastes space & makes degenerate IR.
As per the added FIXME, ultimately, local imported entities should hang
off the function and that way the imported entity list on the CU can be
tested for emptiness like all the other CU lists.
(function-attached local imported entities are probably also the best
path forward for fixing how imported entities are handled both in
cross-module use (currently, while ThinLTO preserves the imported
entities, they would not get used at the imported inlined location -
only in the abstract origin that appears in the partial CU created by
the import (which isn't emitted under Fission due to cross-CU
limitations there)) and to reduce the number of points where imported
entities are emitted (they're currently emitted into every inlined
instance, concrete instance, and abstract origin - they should only go
in teh abstract origin if there is one, otherwise in the concrete
instance - but this requires lots of delayed handling and wiring up,
same as abstract variables & subprograms))
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309354 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: In the current implementation, isPromotionProfitable only checks if the call count to a direct target is no less than a certain percentage threshold of the remaining call counts that have not been promoted. This causes code size problems when the target count is small but greater than a large portion of remaining counts. E.g. target1 takes 99.9%, while target2 takes 0.1%. Both targets will be promoted and inlined, makes the function size too large, which potentially prevents it from further inlining into its callers. This patch adds another percentage threshold against the total indirect call count. If the target count needs to be no less than both thresholds in order to be promoted speculatively.
Reviewers: davidxl, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35962
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309345 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Pointer difference simplifications currently happen only if input GEPs don't have other uses or their indexes are all constants, to avoid duplicating indexing arithmetic.
This patch enables cases with exactly one non-constant index among input GEPs to happen where there is no duplicated arithmetic or code size increase even if input GEPs have other uses.
For example, this patch allows "(&A[42][i]-&A[42][0])" --> "i", which didn't happen previously, if the input GEP(s) have other uses.
Reviewers: sanjoy, bkramer
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35499
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309304 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
MSVC link.exe records all external symbol names in the publics stream.
It provides similar functionality to an ELF .symtab.
Reviewers: zturner, ruiu
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35871
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309303 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a module pass so for the old PM, we can't use ORE, the function
analysis pass. Instead ORE is created on the fly.
A few notes:
- isPromotionLegal is folded in the caller since we want to emit the Function
in the remark but we can only do that if the symbol table look-up succeeded.
- There was good test coverage for remarks in this pass.
- promoteIndirectCall uses ORE conditionally since it's also used from
SampleProfile which does not use ORE yet.
Fixes PR33792.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35929
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309294 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
It is possible for some passes to materialize a call to a libcall (ex: ldexp, exp2, etc),
but these passes will not mark the call as a gc-leaf-function. All libcalls are
actually gc-leaf-functions, so we change llvm::callsGCLeafFunction() to tell us that
available libcalls are equivalent to gc-leaf-function calls.
Reviewers: sanjoy, anna, reames
Reviewed By: anna
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35840
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309291 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
