We're erasing MI here, but then immediately using it again inside the
`if`. This moves the erase after we're done using it.
Doing that reveals a second problem though - this case is missing a
break, so we fall through to the default and dereference MI again.
This is obviously a bug, though I don't know how to write a test that
triggers it - all we do in the error case is print some extra debug
output.
Both of these issue crash on lots of tests under ASAN with the
recycling allocator changes from PR26808 applied.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@264442 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a little embarrassing.
When I reverted r261504 (getIterator() => getInstrIterator()) in
r261567, I did a `git grep` to see if there were new calls to
`getInstrIterator()` that I needed to migrate. There were 10-20 hits,
and I blindly did a `sed ...` before calling `ninja check`.
However, these were `MachineInstrBundleIterator::getInstrIterator()`,
which predated r261567. Perhaps coincidentally, these had an identical
name and return type.
This commit undoes my careless sed and restores
`MachineBasicBlock::iterator::getInstrIterator()`.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@261577 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
One of the changes in lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUMCInstLower.cpp was a new
one. Previously, bundle iterators and single-instruction iterators
could be compared to each other (comparing on underlying pointers).
I changed a comparison from using `MBB->end()` to using
`MBB->instr_end()`, since both end iterators should point at the some
place anyway.
I don't think the implicit conversion between the two iterator types is
a good idea since it's fairly easy to accidentally compare to the wrong
thing (they aren't always end iterators). Otherwise I would have just
added the conversion.
Even with that, no there should be functionality change here.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@250218 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
