NFC-ish. This doesn't change the behaviour of the outliner, but does make sure
that you won't end up with say
OUTLINED_FUNCTION_2:
...
ret
OUTLINED_FUNCTION_248:
...
ret
as the only outlined functions in your module. Those should really be
OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0:
...
ret
OUTLINED_FUNCTION_1:
...
ret
If we produce outlined functions, they probably should have sequential numbers
attached to them. This makes it a bit easier+stable to write outliner tests.
The point of this is to move towards a bit more stability in outlined function
names. By doing this, we at least don't rely on the traversal order of the
suffix tree. Instead, we rely on the order of the candidate list, which is
*far* more consistent. The candidate list is ordered by the end indices of
candidates, so we're more likely to get a stable ordering. This is still
susceptible to changes in the cost model though (like, if we suddenly find new
candidates, for example).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@346340 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This teaches the outliner to save LR to a register rather than the stack when
possible. This allows us to avoid bumping the stack in outlined functions in
some cases. By doing this, in a later patch, we can teach the outliner to do
something like this:
f1:
...
bl OUTLINED_FUNCTION
...
f2:
...
move LR's contents to a register
bl OUTLINED_FUNCTION
move the register's contents back
instead of falling back to saving LR in both cases.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@338278 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There was a missing check for if a candidate list was entirely deleted. This
adds that check.
This fixes an asan failure caused by running test/CodeGen/AArch64/addsub_ext.ll
with the MachineOutliner enabled.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@338148 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Just some gardening here.
Similar to how we moved call information into Candidates, this moves outlined
frame information into OutlinedFunction. This allows us to remove
TargetCostInfo entirely.
Anywhere where we returned a TargetCostInfo struct, we now return an
OutlinedFunction. This establishes OutlinedFunctions as more of a general
repeated sequence, and Candidates as occurrences of those repeated sequences.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@337848 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Before this, TCI contained all the call information for each Candidate.
This moves that information onto the Candidates. As a result, each Candidate
can now supply how it ought to be called. Thus, Candidates will be able to,
say, call the same function in cheaper ways when possible. This also removes
that information from TCI, since it's no longer used there.
A follow-up patch for the AArch64 outliner will demonstrate this.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@337840 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Just some simple gardening to improve clarity.
Before, we had something along the lines of
1) Create a std::vector of Candidates
2) Create an OutlinedFunction
3) Create a std::vector of pointers to Candidates
4) Copy those over to the OutlinedFunction and the Candidate list
Now, OutlinedFunctions create the Candidate pointers. They're still copied
over to the main list of Candidates, but it makes it a bit clearer what's
going on.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@337838 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The checking is done deeper inside MachineBasicBlock, but this will
hopefully help to find issues when porting the machine outliner to a
target where Liveness tracking is broken (like ARM).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49023
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@336481 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is setting up to fix bug 37573 cleanly.
This moves data structures that are technically both used in some way by the
target and the general-purpose outlining algorithm into MachineOutliner.h. In
particular, the `Candidate` class is of importance.
Before, the outliner passed the locations of `Candidates` to the target, which
would then make some decisions about the prospective outlined function. This
change allows us to just pass `Candidates` along to the target. This will allow
the target to discard `Candidates` that would be considered unsafe before cost
calculation. Thus, we will be able to remove the unsafe candidates described in
the bug without resorting to torching the entire prospective function.
Also, as a side-effect, it makes the outliner a bit cleaner.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37573
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@333952 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
