Commit Graph

73 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jakub Kuderski
90edfc7134 [Dominators] Take fast path when applying <=1 updates
Summary:
This patch teaches `DT.applyUpdates` to take the fast when applying zero or just one update and makes it not run the internal batch updater machinery.

With this patch, it should no longer make sense to have a special check in user's code that checks the update sequence size before applying them, e.g.
```
if (!MyUpdates.empty())
  DT.applyUpdates(MyUpdates);
```
or
```
if (MyUpdates.size() == 1)
  if (...)
    DT.insertEdge(...)
  else
    DT.deleteEdge(...)
```

Reviewers: dberlin, brzycki, davide, grosser, sanjoy

Reviewed By: dberlin, davide

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38541

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@314917 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-10-04 17:32:55 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
044f6a4726 [Dominators] Make eraseNode invalidate DFS numbers
This patch makes DT::eraseNode mark DFSInfo as invalid.
Not marking it as invalid leads to DFS numbers getting corrupted
and failing VerifyDFSNumbers check.

This patch also makes children iterator const (NFC).

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@314847 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-10-03 21:17:48 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
7083930287 [Dominators] Add DFS number verification
Summary:
This patch teaches the DominatorTree verifier to check DFS In/Out numbers which are used to answer dominance queries.
DFS number verification is done in O(nlogn), so it shouldn't add much overhead on top of the O(n^3) sibling property verification.
This check should detect errors like the one spotted in PR34466 and related bug reports.

The patch also cleans up the DFS calculation a bit, as all constructed trees should have a single root now.

I see 2 new test failures when running check-all after this change:

```
Failing Tests (2):
    Polly :: Isl/CodeGen/OpenMP/reference-argument-from-non-affine-region.ll
    Polly :: Isl/CodeGen/OpenMP/two-parallel-loops-reference-outer-indvar.ll

```
which seem to happen just after `Create LLVM-IR from SCoPs` -- I XFAILed them in r314800.

Reviewers: dberlin, grosser, davide, zhendongsu, bollu

Reviewed By: dberlin

Subscribers: nandini12396, bollu, Meinersbur, brzycki, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38331

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@314801 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-10-03 14:33:41 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
f39b8ab08c [Dominators] Introduce batch updates
Summary:
This patch introduces a way of informing the (Post)DominatorTree about multiple CFG updates that happened since the last tree update. This makes performing tree updates much easier, as it internally takes care of applying the updates in lockstep with the (virtual) updates to the CFG, which is done by reverse-applying future CFG updates.

The batch updater is able to remove redundant updates that cancel each other out. In the future, it should be also possible to reorder updates to reduce the amount of work needed to perform the updates.

Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, grosser, davide, brzycki

Reviewed By: brzycki

Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36167

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@311015 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-08-16 16:12:52 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
c0f00a9516 [Dominators] Include infinite loops in PostDominatorTree
Summary:
This patch teaches PostDominatorTree about infinite loops. It is built on top of D29705 by @dberlin which includes a very detailed motivation for this change.

What's new is that the patch also teaches the incremental updater how to deal with reverse-unreachable regions and how to properly maintain and verify tree roots. Before that, the incremental algorithm sometimes ended up preserving reverse-unreachable regions after updates that wouldn't appear in the tree if it was constructed from scratch on the same CFG.

This patch makes the following assumptions:
- A sequence of updates should produce the same tree as a recalculating it.
- Any sequence of the same updates should lead to the same tree.
- Siblings and roots are unordered.

The last two properties are essential to efficiently perform batch updates in the future.
When it comes to the first one, we can decide later that the consistency between freshly built tree and an updated one doesn't matter match, as there are many correct ways to pick roots in infinite loops, and to relax this assumption. That should enable us to recalculate postdominators less frequently.

This patch is pretty conservative when it comes to incremental updates on reverse-unreachable regions and ends up recalculating the whole tree in many cases. It should be possible to improve the performance in many cases, if we decide that it's important enough.
That being said, my experiments showed that reverse-unreachable are very rare in the IR emitted by clang when bootstrapping  clang. Here are the statistics I collected by analyzing IR between passes and after each removePredecessor call:

```
# functions:  52283
# samples:  337609
# reverse unreachable BBs:  216022
# BBs:  247840796
Percent reverse-unreachable:  0.08716159869015269 %
Max(PercRevUnreachable) in a function:  87.58620689655172 %
# > 25 % samples:  471 ( 0.1395104988314885 % samples )
... in 145 ( 0.27733680163724345 % functions )
```

Most of the reverse-unreachable regions come from invalid IR where it wouldn't be possible to construct a PostDomTree anyway.

I would like to commit this patch in the next week in order to be able to complete the work that depends on it before the end of my internship, so please don't wait long to voice your concerns :).

Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, grosser, brzycki, davide, chandlerc, hfinkel

Reviewed By: dberlin

Subscribers: nhaehnle, javed.absar, kparzysz, uabelho, jlebar, hiraditya, llvm-commits, dberlin, david2050

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35851

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@310940 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-08-15 18:14:57 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
95e74fa238 [Dominators] Teach LoopDeletion to use the new incremental API
Summary:
This patch makes LoopDeletion use the incremental DominatorTree API.

We modify LoopDeletion to perform the deletion in 5 steps:
1. Create a new dummy edge from the preheader to the exit, by adding a conditional branch.
2. Inform the DomTree about the new edge.
3. Remove the conditional branch and replace it with an unconditional edge to the exit. This removes the edge to the loop header, making it unreachable.
4. Inform the DomTree about the deleted edge.
5. Remove the unreachable block from the function.

Creating the dummy conditional branch is necessary to perform incremental DomTree update.
We should consider using the batch updater when it's ready.

Reviewers: dberlin, davide, grosser, sanjoy

Reviewed By: dberlin, grosser

Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35391

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309850 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-08-02 18:17:52 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
12eeed54bf [Dominators] Fix typos. NFC.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309170 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-07-26 20:26:13 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
a65cddf557 [Dominators] Change Roots type to SmallVector
Summary: We can use the template parameter `IsPostDom` to pick an appropriate SmallVector size to store DomTree roots for dominators and postdominators. Before, the code would always allocate memory with `std::vector`.

Reviewers: dberlin, davide, sanjoy, grosser

Reviewed By: grosser

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35636

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309148 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-07-26 18:27:39 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
22072158f3 [Dominators] Move root-finding out of DomTreeBase and simplify it
Summary:
This patch moves root-finding logic from DominatorTreeBase to GenericDomTreeConstruction.h.
It makes the behavior simpler and more consistent by always adding a virtual root to PostDominatorTrees.

Reviewers: dberlin, davide, grosser, sanjoy

Reviewed By: dberlin

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35597

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309146 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-07-26 18:07:40 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
d3c313212e [Dominators] Workaround explicit instantiation bug.
Some platforms have problems with emmiting constructors when class
templates get explicitly instantiated.
This patch fixes the bug reported in D35315 by replacing `= default`
with an empty constructor body.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@308140 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-07-16 17:01:40 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
82f51d560c [Dominators] Implement incremental deletions
Summary:
This patch implements incremental edge deletions.

It also makes DominatorTreeBase store a pointer to the parent function. The parent function is needed to perform full rebuilts during some deletions, but it is also used to verify that inserted and deleted edges come from the same function.

Reviewers: dberlin, davide, grosser, sanjoy, brzycki

Reviewed By: dberlin

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35342

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@308062 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-07-14 21:58:53 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
79eefe9ee2 [Dominators] Implement incremental insertions
Summary:
This patch introduces incremental edge insertions based on the Depth Based Search algorithm.

Insertions should work for both dominators and postdominators.

Reviewers: dberlin, grosser, davide, sanjoy, brzycki

Reviewed By: dberlin

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35341

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@308054 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-07-14 21:17:33 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
cb105529db [Dominators] Make IsPostDominator a template parameter
Summary:
DominatorTreeBase used to have IsPostDominators (bool) member to indicate if the tree is a dominator or a postdominator tree. This made it possible to switch between the two 'modes' at runtime, but it isn't used in practice anywhere.

This patch makes IsPostDominator a template argument. This way, it is easier to switch between different algorithms at compile-time based on this argument and design external utilities around it. It also makes it impossible to incidentally assign a postdominator tree to a dominator tree (and vice versa), and to further simplify template code in GenericDominatorTreeConstruction.

Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, davide, grosser

Reviewed By: dberlin

Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35315

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@308040 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-07-14 18:26:09 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
1a2e7d2ddc [Dominators] Simplify templates
Summary: DominatorTreeBase and related classes used overcomplicated template machinery. This patch simplifies them and gets rid of DominatorTreeBaseTraits and DominatorTreeBaseByTraits, which weren't actually used outside the DomTree construction.

Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, davide, grosser

Reviewed By: dberlin, davide, grosser

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35285

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@307953 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-07-13 20:45:32 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
1745e246f8 [Dominators] Improve reachability verification
Summary:
This patch improves verification by making `verifyReachablility` look for CFG not found in the DomTree.
It also makes the verification work with postdominators by handling virtual root.

Reviewers: dberlin, davide, grosser, sanjoy

Reviewed By: dberlin

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35279

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@307936 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-07-13 18:55:52 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
8915ae98bd [Dominators] Reapply r306892, r306893, r306893.
This reverts commit r306907 and reapplies the patches in the title.
The patches used to make one of the
CodeGen/ARM/2011-02-07-AntidepClobber.ll test to fail because of a
missing null check.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@306919 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-07-01 00:23:01 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
6d12ee83fa Revert "[Dominators] Teach IDF to use level information"
This reverts commit r306894.

Revert "[Dominators] Add NearestCommonDominator verification"

This reverts commit r306893.

Revert "[Dominators] Keep tree level in DomTreeNode and use it to find NCD and answer dominance queries"

This reverts commit r306892.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@306907 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-06-30 22:56:28 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
83971cbd44 [Dominators] Add NearestCommonDominator verification
Summary:
This patch adds another verification function for checking correctness of findNearestCommonDominator.
For every edge from U to V in the input graph, `NCD(U, V) == IDom(V) or V` -- the new function checks this condition.

Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, chandlerc

Reviewed By: dberlin

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34575

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@306893 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-06-30 21:51:43 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
950d20c758 [Dominators] Keep tree level in DomTreeNode and use it to find NCD and answer dominance queries
Summary:
This patch makes DomTreeNodes keep their level (depth) in the DomTree. By having this information always available, it is possible to speedup and simplify findNearestCommonDominator and certain dominance queries.

In the future, level information will be also needed to perform incremental updates.

My testing doesn't show any noticeable performance differences after applying this patch. There may be some improvements when other passes are thought to use the level information.

Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, chandlerc, grosser

Reviewed By: dberlin

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34548

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@306892 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-06-30 21:51:40 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
564f59ff4d [Dominators] Rearrange access specifiers in DominatorTreeBase
Summary:
This patch makes DominatorTreeBase more readable by putting most important members on top of the class.

Before, the class looked like that: private -> protected (including data members) -> public -> protected.
The patch changes it to: protected (data members only) -> public -> protected -> public.

Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, chandlerc

Reviewed By: dberlin

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34527

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@306714 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-06-29 17:53:35 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
de342018a6 [Dominators] Remove DominatorBase class
Summary:
DominatorBase class was only used by DominatorTreeBase. It didn't provide any useful abstractions, nor simplified anything, so I see no point keeping it.

This commit removes the DominatorBase class and moves its content into DominatorTreeBase.

This is the first patch in a series that tries to make all DomTrees have a single virtual root, which will allow to further simplify code (especially when it comes to incremental updates).

Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, chandlerc

Reviewed By: dberlin

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34493

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@306713 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-06-29 17:50:19 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
1eb58b7d04 [Dominators] Add parent and sibling property verification (non-hacky)
Summary:
This patch adds an additional level of verification - it checks parent and sibling properties of a tree. By definition, every tree with these two properties is a dominator tree.

It is possible to run those check by running llvm with `-verify-dom-info=1`.

Bootstrapping clang and building the llvm test suite with this option enabled doesn't yield any errors.

Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, chandlerc

Reviewed By: dberlin

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34482

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@306711 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-06-29 17:45:51 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
59d4f7d763 [Dominators] Move helper functions into SemiNCAInfo
Summary: Helper functions (DFSPass, ReverseDFSPass, Eval) need SemiNCAInfo anyway, so it's simpler to have them there as member functions. This also makes them simpler by removing template boilerplate.

Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, chandlerc

Reviewed By: dberlin

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34427

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@306579 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-06-28 18:15:45 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
370f3b8d45 [Dominators] Move SemiNCAInfo and helper functions out of DominatorTreeBase
Summary:
This moves SemiNCAInfo from DeminatorTreeBase to GenericDomTreeConstruction. It also put helper functions used during tree constructions in the same file.

The point of this change is to further clean up DominatorTreeBase and make it easier to construct and verify (in future patches).

Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, chandlerc

Reviewed By: dberlin

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34420

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@306576 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-06-28 18:00:36 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
52cfa7b1fb [Dominators] Move IDoms out of DominatorTreeBase and put them in SNCAInfo
Summary: The temporary IDoms map was used only during DomTree calculation. We can move it to SNCAInfo so that it's no longer a DominatorTreeBase member.

Reviewers: sanjoy, dberlin, chandlerc

Reviewed By: dberlin

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34317

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@306574 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-06-28 17:56:09 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
662f95d0d6 [Dominators] Move InfoRec outside of DominatorTreeBase
Summary:
The InfoRec struct is used only during tree construction, so there is no point having it as a DominatorTreeBase member.

This patch moves it into the Calculate function instead and makes it pass it to its helper functions.

Reviewers: sanjoy, dberlin, chandlerc

Reviewed By: dberlin

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34305

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@306572 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-06-28 17:43:54 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
741f2b2554 [Dominators] Move number to node mapping out of DominatorTreeBase
Summary: Number to node mapping in DominatorTreeBase is used only during calculation, so there is no point keeping is as a member variable. This patch moves this mapping to Calculate function and passes it to helper functions. It also makes the name more descriptive.

Reviewers: sanjoy, dberlin, davide, chandlerc

Reviewed By: dberlin

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34295

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@306562 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-06-28 16:54:34 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski
2be2708822 [Dominators] Clean up GenericDomTree.h. NFC.
Summary:
This patch cleans up GenericDomTree.h by:

- removing unnecessary <NodeT> in DomTreeNodeBase
- removing unnecessary std::move on bools
- changing type of DFSNumIn/DFSNumOut from int to unsigned (since the members were used as unsigned anyway)

The changes don't affect behavior -- everything works as before.

Reviewers: sanjoy, dberlin, chandlerc

Reviewed By: dberlin

Subscribers: davide, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34229

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@305710 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-06-19 16:59:20 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
e3e43d9d57 Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.

I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.

This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.

Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@304787 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-06-06 11:49:48 +00:00
Saleem Abdulrasool
74d2cb54e4 Avoid unnecessary copies in some for loops
Use constant references rather than `const auto` which will cause the
copy constructor.  These particular cases cause issues for the swift
compiler.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@301237 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-04-24 20:01:03 +00:00
Tim Shen
97b95a7b72 Cleanup some GraphTraits iteration code
Use children<> and nodes<> in appropriate places to cleanup the code.

Also, as part of the cleanup,
change the signature of DominatorTreeBase's Split.
It is a protected non-virtual member function called only twice,
both from within the class,
and the removed passed argument in both cases is '*this'.
The reason for the existence of that argument seems to be that
back before r43115 Split was a free function,
so an argument to get '*this' was needed - but now that is no longer the
case.

Patch by Yoav Ben-Shalom!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32118

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@300656 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-04-19 03:22:50 +00:00
Sanjoy Das
f8ac651af5 Fix typo in comment; NFC
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@298819 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-03-26 20:56:25 +00:00
Tobias Grosser
da5173f8bf Revert "Fix PR 24415 (at least), by making our post-dominator tree behavior sane."
and also "clang-format GenericDomTreeConstruction.h, since the current
formatting makes it look like their is a bug in the loop indentation, and there
is not"

This reverts commit r296535.

There are still some open design questions which I would like to discuss. I
revert this for Daniel (who gave the OK), as he is on vacation.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@296812 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-03-02 21:08:37 +00:00
Eugene Zelenko
f3b992a333 [Support] Fix some Clang-tidy modernize and Include What You Use warnings; other minor fixes (NFC).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@296714 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-03-01 23:59:26 +00:00
Daniel Berlin
379e7c2248 Fix PR 24415 (at least), by making our post-dominator tree behavior sane.
Summary:
Currently, our post-dom tree tries to ignore and remove the effects of
infinite loops.  It fails miserably at this, because it tries to do it
ahead of time, and thus can only detect self-loops, and any other type
of infinite loop, it pretends doesn't exist at all.

This can, in a bunch of cases, lead to wrong answers and a completely
empty post-dom tree.

Wrong answer:

```
declare void foo()
define internal void @f() {
entry:
  br i1 undef, label %bb35, label %bb3.i

bb3.i:
  call void @foo()
  br label %bb3.i

bb35.loopexit3:
  br label %bb35

bb35:
  ret void
}
```
We get:
```
Inorder PostDominator Tree:
  [1]  <<exit node>> {0,7}
    [2] %bb35 {1,6}
      [3] %bb35.loopexit3 {2,3}
      [3] %entry {4,5}
```

This is a trivial modification of the testcase for PR 6047
Note that we pretend bb3.i doesn't exist.
We also pretend that bb35 post-dominates entry.

While it's true that it does not exit in a theoretical sense, it's not
really helpful to try to ignore the effect and pretend that bb35
post-dominates entry.  Worse, we pretend the infinite loop does
nothing (it's usually considered a side-effect), and doesn't even
exist, even when it calls a function.  Sadly, this makes it impossible
to use when you are trying to move code safely.  All compilers also
create virtual or real single exit nodes (including us), and connect
infinite loops there (which this patch does).  In fact, others have
worked around our behavior here, to the point of building their own
post-dom trees:
https://zneak.github.io/fcd/2016/02/17/structuring.html and pointing
out the region infrastructure is near-useless for them with postdom in
this state :(

Completely empty post-dom tree:
```
define void @spam() #0 {
bb:
  br label %bb1

bb1:                                              ; preds = %bb1, %bb
  br label %bb1

bb2:                                              ; No predecessors!
  ret void
}
```
Printing analysis 'Post-Dominator Tree Construction' for function 'foo':
=============================--------------------------------
Inorder PostDominator Tree:
  [1]  <<exit node>> {0,1}

:(

(note that even if you ignore the effects of infinite loops, bb2
should be present as an exit node that post-dominates nothing).

This patch changes post-dom to properly handle infinite loops and does
root finding during calculation to prevent empty tress in such cases.

We match gcc's (and the canonical theoretical) behavior for infinite
loops (find the backedge, connect it to the exit block).

Testcases coming as soon as i finish running this on a ton of random graphs :)

Reviewers: chandlerc, davide

Subscribers: bryant, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29705

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@296535 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-02-28 22:57:50 +00:00
Daniel Berlin
61d13b1c02 Drop graph_ prefix
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@294621 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-02-09 20:37:46 +00:00
Daniel Berlin
c0fb95811a GraphTraits: Add range versions of graph traits functions (graph_nodes, graph_children, inverse_graph_nodes, inverse_graph_children).
Summary:
Convert all obvious node_begin/node_end and child_begin/child_end
pairs to range based for.

Sending for review in case someone has a good idea how to make
graph_children able to be inferred. It looks like it would require
changing GraphTraits to be two argument or something. I presume
inference does not happen because it would have to check every
GraphTraits in the world to see if the noderef types matched.

Note: This change was 3-staged with clang as well, which uses
Dominators/etc from LLVM.

Reviewers: chandlerc, tstellarAMD, dblaikie, rsmith

Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits, nhaehnle

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29767

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@294620 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-02-09 20:37:24 +00:00
Daniel Berlin
e851e52838 Replace custom written DFS walk with depth first iterator
Summary:
GenericDomTreeConstruction had its own written DFS walk.
It is basically identical to the DFS walk df_* is doing in the iterators.
the one difference is that df_iterator uses an internal visited set.
The GenericDomTreeConstruction one reused a field in an existing densemap lookup.

Time-wise, this way is actually more cache-friendly (the previous way has a random store
into a successor's info, the new way does that store at the same time and in the same place
as other stores to the same info)

It costs some very small amount of memory to do this, and one we pay in some other part of
dom tree construction *anyway*, so we aren't really increasing dom tree constructions's
peak memory usage.

It could still be changed to use the old field with a little work on df_ext_* if we care
(and if someone find performance regressions)

Reviewers: chandlerc

Reviewed By: chandlerc

Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D8932

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@294339 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-02-07 19:24:26 +00:00
Serge Pavlov
b2ae9e2c45 [StructurizeCfg] Update dominator info.
In some cases StructurizeCfg updates root node, but dominator info
remains unchanges, it causes crash when expensive checks are enabled.
To cope with this problem a new method was added to DominatorTreeBase
that allows adding new root nodes, it is called in StructurizeCfg to
put dominator tree in sync.

This change fixes PR27488.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28114


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@291530 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-01-10 02:50:47 +00:00
Tim Shen
f6e737e783 [GraphTraits] Make nodes_iterator dereference to NodeType*/NodeRef
Currently nodes_iterator may dereference to a NodeType* or a NodeType&. Make them all dereference to NodeType*, which is NodeRef later.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23704
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23705


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@279326 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2016-08-19 21:20:13 +00:00
Tim Shen
1dca602a37 [GenericDomTree] Change GenericDomTree to use NodeRef in GraphTraits. NFC.
Summary:
Looking at the implementation, GenericDomTree has more specific
requirements on NodeRef, e.g. NodeRefObject->getParent() should compile,
and NodeRef should be a pointer. We can remove the pointer requirement,
but it seems to have little gain, given the limited use cases.

Also changed GraphTraits<Inverse<Inverse<T>> to be more accurate.

Reviewers: dblaikie, chandlerc

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23593

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@278961 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2016-08-17 20:01:58 +00:00
David Majnemer
975248e4fb Use the range variant of find instead of unpacking begin/end
If the result of the find is only used to compare against end(), just
use is_contained instead.

No functionality change is intended.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@278433 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2016-08-11 22:21:41 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer
5288df58b7 Apply clang-tidy's modernize-loop-convert to most of lib/Transforms.
Only minor manual fixes. No functionality change intended.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@273808 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2016-06-26 12:28:59 +00:00
Daniel Berlin
c81dea1072 Update header documentation for API deliberately made public
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@273473 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2016-06-22 20:31:12 +00:00
Filipe Cabecinhas
2fd54348ae Unify XDEBUG and EXPENSIVE_CHECKS (into the latter), and add an option to the cmake build to enable them.
Summary:
Historically, we had a switch in the Makefiles for turning on "expensive
checks". This has never been ported to the cmake build, but the
(dead-ish) code is still around.

This will also make it easier to turn it on in buildbots.

Reviewers: chandlerc

Subscribers: jyknight, mzolotukhin, RKSimon, gberry, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19723

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@268050 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2016-04-29 15:22:48 +00:00
Michael Liao
e310804af0 [DominatorTree] Remove unnecessary map population. NFC.
- The reason of population these maps seems not valid any more.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@257086 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2016-01-07 19:21:29 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
42247d0394 Revert "Support: Partially revert r249782 to unbreak clang build"
This reverts commit r249783, fully reinstating r249782.  I've fixed the
bug in clang: it was a non-const iterator that dereferenced to const
(but had an implicit conversion to non-const).

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@249850 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-10-09 16:51:23 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
4100fc009b Support: Partially revert r249782 to unbreak clang build
Apparently the iterators in `clang::CFGBlock` have an auto-conversion to
`CFGBlock *`, but the dereference operator gives `const CFGBlock &`.
Until I have a moment to fix that, revert the GenericDomTree chagnes
from r249782.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@249783 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-10-09 00:03:57 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
eac309550f IR: Remove implicit iterator conversions from lib/IR, NFC
Stop converting implicitly between iterators and pointers/references in
lib/IR.  For convenience, I've added a `getIterator()` accessor to
`ilist_node` so that callers don't need to know how to spell the
iterator class (i.e., they can use `X.getIterator()` instead of
`Function::iterator(X)`).

I'll eventually disallow these implicit conversions entirely, but
there's a lot of code, so it doesn't make sense to do it all in one
patch.  One library or so at a time.

Why?  To root out cases of `getNextNode()` and `getPrevNode()` being
used in iterator logic.  The design of `ilist` makes that invalid when
the current node could be at the back of the list, but it happens to
"work" right now because of a bug where those functions never return
`nullptr` if you're using a half-node sentinel.  Before I can fix the
function, I have to remove uses of it that rely on it misbehaving.
(Maybe the function should just be deleted anyway?  But I don't want
deleting it -- potentially a huge project -- to block fixing
ilist/iplist.)

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@249782 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-10-08 23:49:46 +00:00
Philip Reames
710fde8868 [docs] Update DominatorTree docs to clarify expectations around unreachable blocks
Note: I'm am not trying to describe what "should be"; I'm only describing what is true today.

This came out of my recent question to llvm-dev titled: When can the dominator tree not contain a node for a basic block?

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13078



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@248417 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-09-23 18:39:37 +00:00