This patch factors out the main code transformation utilities in the pgo-driven
indirect call promotion pass and places them in Transforms/Utils. The change is
intended to be a non-functional change, letting non-pgo-driven passes share a
common implementation with the existing pgo-driven pass.
The common utilities are used to conditionally promote indirect call sites to
direct call sites. They perform the underlying transformation, and do not
consider profile information. The pgo-specific details (e.g., the computation
of branch weight metadata) have been left in the indirect call promotion pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40658
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319963 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Move splitIndirectCriticalEdges() from CodeGenPrepare to BasicBlockUtils.h so
that it can be called from other places.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40750
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319689 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The core idea is to (re-)introduce some redundancies where their cost is
hidden by the cost of materializing immediates for constant operands of
PHI nodes. When the cost of the redundancies is covered by this,
avoiding materializing the immediate has numerous benefits:
1) Less register pressure
2) Potential for further folding / combining
3) Potential for more efficient instructions due to immediate operand
As a motivating example, consider the remarkably different cost on x86
of a SHL instruction with an immediate operand versus a register
operand.
This pattern turns up surprisingly frequently, but is somewhat rarely
obvious as a significant performance problem.
The pass is entirely target independent, but it does rely on the target
cost model in TTI to decide when to speculate things around the PHI
node. I've included x86-focused tests, but any target that sets up its
immediate cost model should benefit from this pass.
There is probably more that can be done in this space, but the pass
as-is is enough to get some important performance on our internal
benchmarks, and should be generally performance neutral, but help with
more extensive benchmarking is always welcome.
One awkward part is that this pass has to be scheduled after
*everything* that can eliminate these kinds of redundancies. This
includes SimplifyCFG, GVN, etc. I'm open to suggestions about better
places to put this. We could in theory make it part of the codegen pass
pipeline, but there doesn't really seem to be a good reason for that --
it isn't "lowering" in any sense and only relies on pretty standard cost
model based TTI queries, so it seems to fit well with the "optimization"
pipeline model. Still, further thoughts on the pipeline position are
welcome.
I've also only implemented this in the new pass manager. If folks are
very interested, I can try to add it to the old PM as well, but I didn't
really see much point (my use case is already switched over to the new
PM).
I've tested this pretty heavily without issue. A wide range of
benchmarks internally show no change outside the noise, and I don't see
any significant changes in SPEC either. However, the size class
computation in tcmalloc is substantially improved by this, which turns
into a 2% to 4% win on the hottest path through tcmalloc for us, so
there are definitely important cases where this is going to make
a substantial difference.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37467
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319164 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
First step in adding MemorySSA as dependency for loop pass manager.
Adding the dependency under a flag.
New pass manager: MSSA pointer in LoopStandardAnalysisResults can be null.
Legacy and new pass manager: Use cl::opt EnableMSSALoopDependency. Disabled by default.
Reviewers: sanjoy, davide, gberry
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40274
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318772 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
SROA can fail in rewriting alloca but still rewrite a phi resulting
in dead instruction elimination. The Changed flag was not being set
correctly, resulting in downstream passes using stale analyses.
The included test case will assert during the second BDCE pass as a
result.
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39921
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318677 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As the first test shows, we could transform an llvm intrinsic which never sets errno
into a libcall which could set errno (even though it's marked readnone?), so that's
not ideal.
It's possible that we can also transform a libcall which could set errno to an
intrinsic given the fast-math-flags constraint, but that's deferred to determine
exactly which set of FMF are needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40150
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318628 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
making it no longer even remotely simple.
The pass will now be more of a "full loop unswitching" pass rather than
anything substantively simpler than any other approach. I plan to rename
it accordingly once the dust settles.
The key ideas of the new loop unswitcher are carried over for
non-trivial unswitching:
1) Fully unswitch a branch or switch instruction from inside of a loop to
outside of it.
2) Update the CFG and IR. This avoids needing to "remember" the
unswitched branches as well as avoiding excessively cloning and
reliance on complex parts of simplify-cfg to cleanup the cfg.
3) Update the analyses (where we can) rather than just blowing them away
or relying on something else updating them.
Sadly, #3 is somewhat compromised here as the dominator tree updates
were too complex for me to want to reason about. I will need to make
another attempt to do this now that we have a nice dynamic update API
for dominators. However, we do adhere to #3 w.r.t. LoopInfo.
This approach also adds an important principls specific to non-trivial
unswitching: not *all* of the loop will be duplicated when unswitching.
This fact allows us to compute the cost in terms of how much *duplicate*
code is inserted rather than just on raw size. Unswitching conditions
which essentialy partition loops will work regardless of the total loop
size.
Some remaining issues that I will be addressing in subsequent commits:
- Handling unstructured control flow.
- Unswitching 'switch' cases instead of just branches.
- Moving to the dynamic update API for dominators.
Some high-level, interesting limitationsV that folks might want to push
on as follow-ups but that I don't have any immediate plans around:
- We could be much more clever about not cloning things that will be
deleted. In fact, we should be able to delete *nothing* and do
a minimal number of clones.
- There are many more interesting selection criteria for which branch to
unswitch that we might want to look at. One that I'm interested in
particularly are a set of conditions which all exit the loop and which
can be merged into a single unswitched test of them.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34200
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318549 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a recommit of r316869 which was speculatively reverted with r317444 and
subsequently shown to not be the cause of PR35210. That crash should be fixed
after r318237.
Original commit message:
The old PM sets the options of what used to be known as "latesimplifycfg" on the
instantiation after the vectorizers have run, so that's what we'redoing here.
FWIW, there's a later SimplifyCFGPass instantiation in both PMs where we do not
set the "late" options. I'm not sure if that's intentional or not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39407
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318299 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Clang implements the -finstrument-functions flag inherited from GCC, which
inserts calls to __cyg_profile_func_{enter,exit} on function entry and exit.
This is useful for getting a trace of how the functions in a program are
executed. Normally, the calls remain even if a function is inlined into another
function, but it is useful to be able to turn this off for users who are
interested in a lower-level trace, i.e. one that reflects what functions are
called post-inlining. (We use this to generate link order files for Chromium.)
LLVM already has a pass for inserting similar instrumentation calls to
mcount(), which it does after inlining. This patch renames and extends that
pass to handle calls both to mcount and the cygprofile functions, before and/or
after inlining as controlled by function attributes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39287
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318195 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Registers it and everything, updates all the references, etc.
Next patch will add support to Clang's `-fexperimental-new-pass-manager`
path to actually enable BoundsChecking correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39084
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318128 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch extends the partial inliner to support inlining parts of
vararg functions, if the vararg handling is done in the outlined part.
It adds a `ForwardVarArgsTo` argument to InlineFunction. If it is
non-null, all varargs passed to the inlined function will be added to
all calls to `ForwardVarArgsTo`.
The partial inliner takes care to only pass `ForwardVarArgsTo` if the
varargs handing is done in the outlined function. It checks that vastart
is not part of the function to be inlined.
`test/Transforms/CodeExtractor/PartialInlineNoInline.ll` (already part
of the repo) checks we do not do partial inlining if vastart is used in
a basic block that will be inlined.
Reviewers: davide, davidxl, grosser
Reviewed By: davide, davidxl, grosser
Subscribers: gyiu, grosser, eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39607
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318028 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As discussed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-November/107104.html
and again more recently:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118118.html
...this is a step in cleaning up our fast-math-flags implementation in IR to better match
the capabilities of both clang's user-visible flags and the backend's flags for SDNode.
As proposed in the above threads, we're replacing the 'UnsafeAlgebra' bit (which had the
'umbrella' meaning that all flags are set) with a new bit that only applies to algebraic
reassociation - 'AllowReassoc'.
We're also adding a bit to allow approximations for library functions called 'ApproxFunc'
(this was initially proposed as 'libm' or similar).
...and we're out of bits. 7 bits ought to be enough for anyone, right? :) FWIW, I did
look at getting this out of SubclassOptionalData via SubclassData (spacious 16-bits),
but that's apparently already used for other purposes. Also, I don't think we can just
add a field to FPMathOperator because Operator is not intended to be instantiated.
We'll defer movement of FMF to another day.
We keep the 'fast' keyword. I thought about removing that, but seeing IR like this:
%f.fast = fadd reassoc nnan ninf nsz arcp contract afn float %op1, %op2
...made me think we want to keep the shortcut synonym.
Finally, this change is binary incompatible with existing IR as seen in the
compatibility tests. This statement:
"Newer releases can ignore features from older releases, but they cannot miscompile
them. For example, if nsw is ever replaced with something else, dropping it would be
a valid way to upgrade the IR."
( http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#ir-backwards-compatibility )
...provides the flexibility we want to make this change without requiring a new IR
version. Ie, we're not loosening the FP strictness of existing IR. At worst, we will
fail to optimize some previously 'fast' code because it's no longer recognized as
'fast'. This should get fixed as we audit/squash all of the uses of 'isFast()'.
Note: an inter-dependent clang commit to use the new API name should closely follow
commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39304
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@317488 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@317362 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
Reviewers: davidxl, huntergr, chandlerc, mcrosier, eraman, davide
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: sdesmalen, ashutosh.nema, fhahn, mssimpso, aemerson, mgorny, mehdi_amini, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39137
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@317351 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Currently the block frequency analysis is an approximation for irreducible
loops.
The new irreducible loop metadata is used to annotate the irreducible loop
headers with their header weights based on the PGO profile (currently this is
approximated to be evenly weighted) and to help improve the accuracy of the
block frequency analysis for irreducible loops.
This patch is a basic support for this.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39028
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@317278 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
undefined reference to `llvm::TargetPassConfig::ID' on
clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage
This reverts commit eea333c33fa73ad225ef28607795984829f65688.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@317213 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This is mostly a noop (most of the test diffs are renamed blocks).
There are a few temporary register renames (eax<->ecx) and a few blocks are
shuffled around.
See the discussion in PR33325 for more details.
Reviewers: spatel
Subscribers: mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39456
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@317211 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The optimisation remarks for loop unrolling with an unrolled remainder looks something like:
test.c:7:18: remark: completely unrolled loop with 3 iterations [-Rpass=loop-unroll]
C[i] += A[i*N+j];
^
test.c:6:9: remark: unrolled loop by a factor of 4 with run-time trip count [-Rpass=loop-unroll]
for(int j = 0; j < N; j++)
^
This removes the first of the two messages.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38725
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316986 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch fixes the miscompile that happens when PRE hoists loads across guards and
other instructions that don't always pass control flow to their successors. PRE is now prohibited
to hoist across such instructions because there is no guarantee that the load standing after such
instruction is still valid before such instruction. For example, a load from under a guard may be
invalid before the guard in the following case:
int array[LEN];
...
guard(0 <= index && index < LEN);
use(array[index]);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37460
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316975 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The old PM sets the options of what used to be known as "latesimplifycfg" on the
instantiation after the vectorizers have run, so that's what we'redoing here.
FWIW, there's a later SimplifyCFGPass instantiation in both PMs where we do not
set the "late" options. I'm not sure if that's intentional or not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39407
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316869 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is no-functional-change-intended.
This is repackaging the functionality of D30333 (defer switch-to-lookup-tables) and
D35411 (defer folding unconditional branches) with pass parameters rather than a named
"latesimplifycfg" pass. Now that we have individual options to control the functionality,
we could decouple when these fire (but that's an independent patch if desired).
The next planned step would be to add another option bit to disable the sinking transform
mentioned in D38566. This should also make it clear that the new pass manager needs to
be updated to limit simplifycfg in the same way as the old pass manager.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38631
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316835 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch adds a new pass for attaching !callees metadata to indirect call
sites. The pass propagates values to call sites by performing an IPSCCP-like
analysis using the generic sparse propagation solver. For indirect call sites
having a small set of possible callees, the attached metadata indicates what
those callees are. The metadata can be used to facilitate optimizations like
intersecting the function attributes of the possible callees, refining the call
graph, performing indirect call promotion, etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37355
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316576 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As discussed in D39011:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39011
...replacing constants with a variable is inverting the transform done
by other IR passes, so we definitely don't want to do this early.
In fact, it's questionable whether this transform belongs in SimplifyCFG
at all. I'll look at moving this to codegen as a follow-up step.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316298 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
MergeFunctions uses (through FunctionComparator) a map of GlobalValues
to identifiers because it needs to compare functions and globals
do not have an inherent total order. Thus, FunctionComparator
(through GlobalNumberState) has a ValueMap<GlobalValue *>.
r315852 added a RAUW on globals that may have been previously
encountered by the FunctionComparator, which would replace
a GlobalValue * key with a ConstantExpr *, which is illegal.
This commit adjusts that code path to remove the function being
replaced from the ValueMap as well.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316145 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
std::unordered_multimap happens to be very slow when the number of elements
grows large. On one of our internal applications we observed a 17x compile time
improvement from changing it to DenseMap.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, serge-sans-paille, davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38916
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316045 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch reverts rL315440 because of the bug described at
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34937
The fix for the bug is on review as D38944, but not yet ready. Given this is a regression reverting until a fix is ready is called for.
Max would have done the revert himself, but is having trouble doing a build of fresh LLVM for some reason. I did the build and test to ensure the revert worked as expected on his behalf.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@315974 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch fixes the miscompile that happens when PRE hoists loads across guards and
other instructions that don't always pass control flow to their successors. PRE is now prohibited
to hoist across such instructions because there is no guarantee that the load standing after such
instruction is still valid before such instruction. For example, a load from under a guard may be
invalid before the guard in the following case:
int array[LEN];
...
guard(0 <= index && index < LEN);
use(array[index]);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37460
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@315440 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It is possible for two modules to define the same set of external
symbols without causing a duplicate symbol error at link time,
as long as each of the symbols is a comdat member. So we cannot
use them as part of a unique id for the module.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38602
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@315026 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
