Causes unexpected memory issue with New PM this time.
The new PM invalidates BPI but not BFI, leaving the
reference to BPI from BFI invalid.
Abandon this patch. There is a more general solution
which also handles runtime infinite loop (but not statically).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@320180 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
An undef extract index can be arbitrarily chosen to be an
out-of-range index value, which would result in the instruction being undef.
This change closes a gap identified while working on lowering vector permute intrinsics
with variable index vectors to pure LLVM IR.
Reviewers: arsenm, spatel, majnemer
Reviewed By: arsenm, spatel
Subscribers: fhahn, nhaehnle, wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40231
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319910 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This caused PR35519.
> [memcpyopt] Teach memcpyopt to optimize across basic blocks
>
> This teaches memcpyopt to make a non-local memdep query when a local query
> indicates that the dependency is non-local. This notably allows it to
> eliminate many more llvm.memcpy calls in common Rust code, often by 20-30%.
>
> Fixes PR28958.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38374
>
> [memcpyopt] Commit file missed in r319482.
>
> This change was meant to be included with r319482 but was accidentally
> omitted.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319873 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
A true or false result is expected from a comparison, but it seems the possibility of undef was overlooked, which could lead to a failed assert. This is fixed by this patch by bailing out if we encounter undef.
The bug is old and the assert has been there since the end of 2014, so it seems this is unusual enough to forego optimization.
Patch by JesperAntonsson.
Reviewers: spatel, eeckstein, hans
Reviewed By: hans
Subscribers: uabelho, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40639
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319768 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(This reapplies r314253. r314253 was reverted on r314482 because of a
correctness regression on P100, but that regression was identified to be
something else.)
Summary:
Don't bail out on constant divisors for divisions that can be narrowed without
introducing control flow . This gives us a 32 bit multiply instead of an
emulated 64 bit multiply in the generated PTX assembly.
Reviewers: jlebar
Subscribers: jholewinski, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38265
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319677 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Currently, we only support predication for forward loops with step
of 1. This patch enables loop predication for reverse or
countdownLoops, which satisfy the following conditions:
1. The step of the IV is -1.
2. The loop has a singe latch as B(X) = X <pred>
latchLimit with pred as s> or u>
3. The IV of the guard is the decrement
IV of the latch condition (Guard is: G(X) = X-1 u< guardLimit).
This patch was downstream for a while and is the last series of patches
that's from our LP implementation downstream.
Reviewers: apilipenko, mkazantsev, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40353
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319659 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Turns out we can have comparisons which are indirect users of the induction variable that we can make invariant. In this case, there is no loop invariant value contributing and we'd fail an assert.
The test case was found by a java fuzzer and reduced. It's a real cornercase. You have to have a static loop which we've already proven only executes once, but haven't broken the backedge on, and an inner phi whose result can be constant folded by SCEV using exit count reasoning but not proven by isKnownPredicate. To my knowledge, only the fuzzer has hit this case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319583 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These are blocks that haven't not been executed during training. For large
projects this could make a significant difference. For the project, I was
looking at, I got an order of magnitude decrease in the size of the total YAML
files with this and r319235.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40678
Re-commit after fixing the failing testcase in rL319576, rL319577 and
rL319578.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319581 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r319556.
Something is not working with this when used with sample-based profiling.
Investigating...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319562 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These are blocks that haven't not been executed during training. For large
projects this could make a significant difference. For the project, I was
looking at, I got an order of magnitude decrease in the size of the total YAML
files with this and r319235.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40678
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319556 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It causes builds to fail with "Instruction does not dominate all uses" (PR35497).
> Patch tries to improve vectorization of the following code:
>
> void add1(int * __restrict dst, const int * __restrict src) {
> *dst++ = *src++;
> *dst++ = *src++ + 1;
> *dst++ = *src++ + 2;
> *dst++ = *src++ + 3;
> }
> Allows to vectorize even if the very first operation is not a binary add, but just a load.
>
> Fixed issues related to previous commit.
>
> Reviewers: spatel, mzolotukhin, mkuper, hfinkel, RKSimon, filcab, ABataev
>
> Reviewed By: ABataev, RKSimon
>
> Subscribers: llvm-commits, RKSimon
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28907
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319550 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been extended, such that it promotes Scale to
accommodate similar operand appearing in the DAG e.g.
T1 = A + B
T2 = T1 + 10
T3 = T2 + A
For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will now look like
Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs so that if there is an opportunity
then complex LEAs (having 3 operands) could be factored out e.g.
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
will be factored as following
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops, thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
4/ Simplify LEA converts (lea (BASE,1,INDEX,0) --> add (BASE, INDEX) which offers better through put.
PR32755 will be taken care of by this pathc.
Previous patch revisions : r313343 , r314886
Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet, jmolloy, jbhateja
Reviewed By: lsaba, RKSimon, jbhateja
Subscribers: jmolloy, spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319543 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
A true or false result is expected from a comparison, but it seems the possibility of undef was overlooked, which could lead to a failed assert. This is fixed by this patch by bailing out if we encounter undef.
The bug is old and the assert has been there since the end of 2014, so it seems this is unusual enough to forego optimization.
Patch by: JesperAntonsson
Reviewers: spatel, eeckstein, hans
Reviewed By: hans
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40639
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319537 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Patch tries to improve vectorization of the following code:
void add1(int * __restrict dst, const int * __restrict src) {
*dst++ = *src++;
*dst++ = *src++ + 1;
*dst++ = *src++ + 2;
*dst++ = *src++ + 3;
}
Allows to vectorize even if the very first operation is not a binary add, but just a load.
Fixed issues related to previous commit.
Reviewers: spatel, mzolotukhin, mkuper, hfinkel, RKSimon, filcab, ABataev
Reviewed By: ABataev, RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits, RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28907
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319531 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Recommiting once reverted patch rL319407 after adding a check for bit vector size to avoid failures in some build bots.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319522 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If the thin module has no references to an internal global in the
merged module, we need to make sure to preserve that property if the
global is a member of a comdat group, as otherwise promotion can end
up adding global symbols to the comdat, which is not allowed.
This situation can arise if the external global in the thin module
has dead constant users, which would cause use_empty() to return
false and would cause us to try to promote it. To prevent this from
happening, discard the dead constant users before asking whether a
global is empty.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40593
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319494 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This teaches memcpyopt to make a non-local memdep query when a local query
indicates that the dependency is non-local. This notably allows it to
eliminate many more llvm.memcpy calls in common Rust code, often by 20-30%.
Fixes PR28958.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38374
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319482 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently, SROA splits loads and stores only when they are accessing the whole alloca.
This patch relaxes this limitation to allow splitting a load/store if all other loads and stores to the alloca are disjoint to or fully included in the current load/store. If there is no other load or store that crosses the boundary of the current load/store, the current splitting implementation works as is.
The whole-alloca loads and stores meet this new condition and so they are still splittable.
Here is a simplified motivating example.
struct record {
long long a;
int b;
int c;
};
int func(struct record r) {
for (int i = 0; i < r.c; i++)
r.b++;
return r.b;
}
When updating r.b (or r.c as well), LLVM generates redundant instructions on some platforms (such as x86_64, ppc64); here, r.b and r.c are packed into one 64-bit GPR when the struct is passed as a method argument.
With this patch, the above example is compiled into only few instructions without loop.
Without the patch, unnecessary loop-carried dependency is introduced by SROA and the loop cannot be eliminated by the later optimizers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32998
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319407 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If common type is different we should bail out due to we will not be
able to create a select or Phi of these values.
Basically it is done in ExtAddrMode::compare however it does not work
if we handle the null first and then two values of different types.
so add a check in initializeMap as well. The check in ExtAddrMode::compare
is used as earlier bail out.
Reviewers: reames, john.brawn
Reviewed By: john.brawn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40479
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319292 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Apparently the verifier requires that inlineable calls in a function
with debug info have debug locations.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319199 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The core idea is to (re-)introduce some redundancies where their cost is
hidden by the cost of materializing immediates for constant operands of
PHI nodes. When the cost of the redundancies is covered by this,
avoiding materializing the immediate has numerous benefits:
1) Less register pressure
2) Potential for further folding / combining
3) Potential for more efficient instructions due to immediate operand
As a motivating example, consider the remarkably different cost on x86
of a SHL instruction with an immediate operand versus a register
operand.
This pattern turns up surprisingly frequently, but is somewhat rarely
obvious as a significant performance problem.
The pass is entirely target independent, but it does rely on the target
cost model in TTI to decide when to speculate things around the PHI
node. I've included x86-focused tests, but any target that sets up its
immediate cost model should benefit from this pass.
There is probably more that can be done in this space, but the pass
as-is is enough to get some important performance on our internal
benchmarks, and should be generally performance neutral, but help with
more extensive benchmarking is always welcome.
One awkward part is that this pass has to be scheduled after
*everything* that can eliminate these kinds of redundancies. This
includes SimplifyCFG, GVN, etc. I'm open to suggestions about better
places to put this. We could in theory make it part of the codegen pass
pipeline, but there doesn't really seem to be a good reason for that --
it isn't "lowering" in any sense and only relies on pretty standard cost
model based TTI queries, so it seems to fit well with the "optimization"
pipeline model. Still, further thoughts on the pipeline position are
welcome.
I've also only implemented this in the new pass manager. If folks are
very interested, I can try to add it to the old PM as well, but I didn't
really see much point (my use case is already switched over to the new
PM).
I've tested this pretty heavily without issue. A wide range of
benchmarks internally show no change outside the noise, and I don't see
any significant changes in SPEC either. However, the size class
computation in tcmalloc is substantially improved by this, which turns
into a 2% to 4% win on the hottest path through tcmalloc for us, so
there are definitely important cases where this is going to make
a substantial difference.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37467
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319164 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
I think we do not need to analyze debug intrinsics here, as they should
not impact codegen. This has 2 benefits: 1) slightly less work to do and
2) avoiding generating optimization remarks for converting calls to
debug intrinsics to tail calls, which are not really helpful for users.
Based on work by Sander de Smalen.
Reviewers: davide, trentxintong, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits, JDevlieghere
Tags: #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40440
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@319158 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
