The liveness-tracking code assumes that the registers that were saved
in the function's prolog are live outside of the function. Specifically,
that registers that were saved are also live-on-exit from the function.
This isn't always the case as illustrated by the LR register on ARM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36160
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@310619 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
CFI instructions that set appropriate cfa offset and cfa register are now
inserted in emitEpilogue() in X86FrameLowering.
Majority of the changes in this patch:
1. Ensure that CFI instructions do not affect code generation.
2. Enable maintaining correct information about cfa offset and cfa register
in a function when basic blocks are reordered, merged, split, duplicated.
These changes are target independent and described below.
Changed CFI instructions so that they:
1. are duplicable
2. are not counted as instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging
3. can be compared as equal
Add information to each MachineBasicBlock about cfa offset and cfa register
that are valid at its entry and exit (incoming and outgoing CFI info). Add
support for updating this information when basic blocks are merged, split,
duplicated, created. Add a verification pass (CFIInfoVerifier) that checks
that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match incoming
values of their successors.
Incoming and outgoing CFI information is used by a late pass
(CFIInstrInserter) that corrects CFA calculation rule for a basic block if
needed. That means that additional CFI instructions get inserted at basic
block beginning to correct the rule for calculating CFA. Having CFI
instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA calculation rule
for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic block reordering,
or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the blocks have wrong
cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block above them.
Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18046
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@306529 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
IPRA try to optimize caller saved register by propagating register
usage information from callee to caller so it is beneficial to have
caller saved registers compare to callee saved registers when IPRA
is enabled. Please find more detailed explanation here
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/llvm-dev/XRzGhJ9wtZg/tjAJqb0eEgAJ.
This change makes local function do not have any callee preserved
register when IPRA is enabled. A simple test case is also added to
verify this change.
Patch by Vivek Pandya <vivekvpandya@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21561
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@275347 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
... into getFrameIndexReferencePreferSP. This change folds the
fail-then-retry logic into getFrameIndexReferencePreferSP.
There is a non-functional but behaviorial change in WinException --
earlier if `getFrameIndexReferenceFromSP` failed we'd trip an assert,
but now we'll silently use the (wrong) offset from the base pointer. I
could not write the assert I'd like to write ("FrameReg ==
StackRegister", like I've done in X86FrameLowering) since there is no
easy way to get to the stack register from WinException (happy to be
proven wrong here). One solution to this is to add a `bool
OnlyStackPointer` parameter to `getFrameIndexReferenceFromSP` that
asserts if it could not satisfy its promise of returning an offset from
a stack pointer, but that seems overkill.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: sanjoy, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21427
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@272938 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
... when the offset is not statically known.
Prioritize addresses relative to the stack pointer in the stackmap, but
fallback gracefully to other modes of addressing if the offset to the
stack pointer is not a known constant.
Patch by Oscar Blumberg!
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits, majnemer, rnk, sanjoy, thanm
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21259
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@272756 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
If the target requests it, use emptry spaces in the fixed and
callee-save stack area to allocate local stack objects.
AArch64: Change last callee-save reg stack object alignment instead of
size to leave a gap to take advantage of above change.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, qcolombet, MatzeB
Subscribers: rengolin, mcrosier, llvm-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20220
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@271527 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This will become necessary in a subsequent change to make this method
merge adjacent stack adjustments, i.e. it might erase the previous
and/or next instruction.
It also greatly simplifies the calls to this function from Prolog-
EpilogInserter. Previously, that had a bunch of logic to resume iteration
after the call; now it just continues with the returned iterator.
Note that this changes the behaviour of PEI a little. Previously,
it attempted to re-visit the new instruction created by
eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr(). That code was added in r36625,
but I can't see any reason for it: the new instructions will obviously
not be pseudo instructions, they will not have FrameIndex operands,
and we have already accounted for the stack adjustment.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18627
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@265036 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For CoreCLR on Windows, stack probes must be emitted as inline sequences that probe successive stack pages
between the current stack limit and the desired new stack pointer location. This implements support for
the inline expansion on x64.
For in-body alloca probes, expansion is done during instruction lowering. For prolog probes, a stub call
is initially emitted during prolog creation, and expanded after epilog generation, to avoid complications
that arise when introducing new machine basic blocks during prolog and epilog creation.
Added a new test case, modified an existing one to exclude non-x64 coreclr (for now).
Add test case
Fix tests
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252578 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Our previous value of "16 + 8 + MaxCallFrameSize" for ParentFrameOffset
is incorrect when CSRs are involved. We were supposed to have a test
case to catch this, but it wasn't very rigorous.
The main effect here is that calling _CxxThrowException inside a
catchpad doesn't immediately crash on MOVAPS when you have an odd number
of CSRs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@250583 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There was an off-by-one bug in ip2state tables which manifested when one
call immediately preceded the try-range of the next. The return address
of the previous call would appear to be within the try range of the next
scope, resulting in extra destructors or catches running.
We also computed the wrong offset for catch parameter stack objects. The
offset should be from RSP, not from RBP.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@249578 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
HHVM calling convention, hhvmcc, is used by HHVM JIT for
functions in translated cache. We currently support LLVM back end to
generate code for X86-64 and may support other architectures in the
future.
In HHVM calling convention any GP register could be used to pass and
return values, with the exception of R12 which is reserved for
thread-local area and is callee-saved. Other than R12, we always
pass RBX and RBP as args, which are our virtual machine's stack pointer
and frame pointer respectively.
When we enter translation cache via hhvmcc function, we expect
the stack to be aligned at 16 bytes, i.e. skewed by 8 bytes as opposed
to standard ABI alignment. This affects stack object alignment and stack
adjustments for function calls.
One extra calling convention, hhvm_ccc, is used to call C++ helpers from
HHVM's translation cache. It is almost identical to standard C calling
convention with an exception of first argument which is passed in RBP
(before we use RDI, RSI, etc.)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12681
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@248832 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Based on comments from Hal
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150810/292978.html),
I've changed the interface to add a callback mechanism to the
TargetFrameLowering class to query whether the specific target
supports shrink wrapping. By default, shrink wrapping is disabled by
default. Each target can override the default behaviour using the
TargetFrameLowering::targetSupportsShrinkWrapping() method. Shrink
wrapping can still be explicitly enabled or disabled from the command
line, using the existing -enable-shrink-wrap=<true|false> option.
Phabricator: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12293
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@246463 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit adds a new function TargetFrameLowering::alignSPAdjust
and calls it from TargetInstrInfo::getSPAdjust. It fixes PR24142.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@245253 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This changes TargetFrameLowering::processFunctionBeforeCalleeSavedScan():
- Rename the function to determineCalleeSaves()
- Pass a bitset of callee saved registers by reference, thus avoiding
the function-global PhysRegUsed bitset in MachineRegisterInfo.
- Without PhysRegUsed the implementation is fine tuned to not save
physcial registers which are only read but never modified.
Related to rdar://21539507
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10909
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@242165 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@240137 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the target can handle a given basic block as prologue
or epilogue.
Related to <rdar://problem/20821487>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@238292 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is part of the work to remove TargetMachine::resetTargetOptions.
In this patch, instead of updating global variable NoFramePointerElim in
resetTargetOptions, its use in DisableFramePointerElim is replaced with a call
to TargetFrameLowering::noFramePointerElim. This function determines on a
per-function basis if frame pointer elimination should be disabled.
There is no change in functionality except that cl:opt option "disable-fp-elim"
can now override function attribute "no-frame-pointer-elim".
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@238080 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch introduces a new pass that computes the safe point to insert the
prologue and epilogue of the function.
The interest is to find safe points that are cheaper than the entry and exits
blocks.
As an example and to avoid regressions to be introduce, this patch also
implements the required bits to enable the shrink-wrapping pass for AArch64.
** Context **
Currently we insert the prologue and epilogue of the method/function in the
entry and exits blocks. Although this is correct, we can do a better job when
those are not immediately required and insert them at less frequently executed
places.
The job of the shrink-wrapping pass is to identify such places.
** Motivating example **
Let us consider the following function that perform a call only in one branch of
a if:
define i32 @f(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
%tmp = alloca i32, align 4
%tmp2 = icmp slt i32 %a, %b
br i1 %tmp2, label %true, label %false
true:
store i32 %a, i32* %tmp, align 4
%tmp4 = call i32 @doSomething(i32 0, i32* %tmp)
br label %false
false:
%tmp.0 = phi i32 [ %tmp4, %true ], [ %a, %0 ]
ret i32 %tmp.0
}
On AArch64 this code generates (removing the cfi directives to ease
readabilities):
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
LBB0_2: ; %false
mov sp, x29
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
ret
With shrink-wrapping we could generate:
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
add sp, x29, #16 ; =16
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
LBB0_2: ; %false
ret
Therefore, we would pay the overhead of setting up/destroying the frame only if
we actually do the call.
** Proposed Solution **
This patch introduces a new machine pass that perform the shrink-wrapping
analysis (See the comments at the beginning of ShrinkWrap.cpp for more details).
It then stores the safe save and restore point into the MachineFrameInfo
attached to the MachineFunction.
This information is then used by the PrologEpilogInserter (PEI) to place the
related code at the right place. This pass runs right before the PEI.
Unlike the original paper of Chow from PLDI’88, this implementation of
shrink-wrapping does not use expensive data-flow analysis and does not need hack
to properly avoid frequently executed point. Instead, it relies on dominance and
loop properties.
The pass is off by default and each target can opt-in by setting the
EnableShrinkWrap boolean to true in their derived class of TargetPassConfig.
This setting can also be overwritten on the command line by using
-enable-shrink-wrap.
Before you try out the pass for your target, make sure you properly fix your
emitProlog/emitEpilog/adjustForXXX method to cope with basic blocks that are not
necessarily the entry block.
** Design Decisions **
1. ShrinkWrap is its own pass right now. It could frankly be merged into PEI but
for debugging and clarity I thought it was best to have its own file.
2. Right now, we only support one save point and one restore point. At some
point we can expand this to several save point and restore point, the impacted
component would then be:
- The pass itself: New algorithm needed.
- MachineFrameInfo: Hold a list or set of Save/Restore point instead of one
pointer.
- PEI: Should loop over the save point and restore point.
Anyhow, at least for this first iteration, I do not believe this is interesting
to support the complex cases. We should revisit that when we motivating
examples.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9210
<rdar://problem/3201744>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@236507 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This moves the transformation introduced in r223757 into a separate MI pass.
This allows it to cover many more cases (not only cases where there must be a
reserved call frame), and perform rudimentary call folding. It still doesn't
have a heuristic, so it is enabled only for optsize/minsize, with stack
alignment <= 8, where it ought to be a fairly clear win.
(Re-commit of r227728)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6789
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227752 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This moves the transformation introduced in r223757 into a separate MI pass.
This allows it to cover many more cases (not only cases where there must be a
reserved call frame), and perform rudimentary call folding. It still doesn't
have a heuristic, so it is enabled only for optsize/minsize, with stack
alignment <= 8, where it ought to be a fairly clear win.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6789
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227728 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These intrinsics allow multiple functions to share a single stack
allocation from one function's call frame. The function with the
allocation may only perform one allocation, and it must be in the entry
block.
Functions accessing the allocation call llvm.recoverframeallocation with
the function whose frame they are accessing and a frame pointer from an
active call frame of that function.
These intrinsics are very difficult to inline correctly, so the
intention is that they be introduced rarely, or at least very late
during EH preparation.
Reviewers: echristo, andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6493
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225746 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the second patch in a small series. This patch contains the MachineInstruction and x86-64 backend pieces required to lower Statepoints. It does not include the code to actually generate the STATEPOINT machine instruction and as a result, the entire patch is currently dead code. I will be submitting the SelectionDAG parts within the next 24-48 hours. Since those pieces are by far the most complicated, I wanted to minimize the size of that patch. That patch will include the tests which exercise the functionality in this patch. The entire series can be seen as one combined whole in http://reviews.llvm.org/D5683.
The STATEPOINT psuedo node is generated after all gc values are explicitly spilled to stack slots. The purpose of this node is to wrap an actual call instruction while recording the spill locations of the meta arguments used for garbage collection and other purposes. The STATEPOINT is modeled as modifing all of those locations to prevent backend optimizations from forwarding the value from before the STATEPOINT to after the STATEPOINT. (Doing so would break relocation semantics for collectors which wish to relocate roots.)
The implementation of STATEPOINT is closely modeled on PATCHPOINT. Eventually, much of the code in this patch will be removed. The long term plan is to merge the functionality provided by statepoints and patchpoints. Merging their implementations in the backend is likely to be a good starting point.
Reviewed by: atrick, ributzka
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223085 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
--
This patch enables LLVM to emit Win64-native unwind info rather than
DWARF CFI. It handles all corner cases (I hope), including stack
realignment.
Because the unwind info is not flexible enough to describe stack frames
with a gap of unknown size in the middle, such as the one caused by
stack realignment, I modified register spilling code to place all spills
into the fixed frame slots, so that they can be accessed relative to the
frame pointer.
Patch by Vadim Chugunov!
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4081
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@211691 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch enables LLVM to emit Win64-native unwind info rather than
DWARF CFI. It handles all corner cases (I hope), including stack
realignment.
Because the unwind info is not flexible enough to describe stack frames
with a gap of unknown size in the middle, such as the one caused by
stack realignment, I modified register spilling code to place all spills
into the fixed frame slots, so that they can be accessed relative to the
frame pointer.
Patch by Vadim Chugunov!
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4081
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@211399 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
SystemZ wants normal register scavenging slots, as close to the stack or
frame pointer as possible. The only reason it was using custom code was
because PrologEpilogInserter assumed an x86-like layout, where the frame
pointer is at the opposite end of the frame from the stack pointer.
This meant that when frame pointer elimination was disabled,
the slots ended up being as close as possible to the incoming
stack pointer, which is the opposite of what we want on SystemZ.
This patch adds a new knob to say which layout is used and converts
SystemZ to use target-independent scavenging slots. It's one of the pieces
needed to support frame-to-frame MVCs, where two slots might be required.
The ABI requires us to allocate 160 bytes for calls, so one approach
would be to use that area as temporary spill space instead. It would need
some surgery to make sure that the slot isn't live across a call though.
I stuck to the "isFPCloseToIncomingSP - ..." style comment on the
"do what the surrounding code does" principle. The FP case is already
covered by several Systemz/frame-* tests, which fail without the
PrologueEpilogueInserter change, so no new ones are needed.
No behavioural change intended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185696 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add the current PEI register scavenger as a parameter to the
processFunctionBeforeFrameFinalized callback.
This change is necessary in order to allow the PowerPC target code to
set the register scavenger frame index after the save-area offset
adjustments performed by processFunctionBeforeFrameFinalized. Only
after these adjustments have been made is it possible to estimate
the size of the stack frame.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177108 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to TargetFrameLowering, where it belongs. Incidentally, this allows us
to delete some duplicated (and slightly different!) code in TRI.
There are potentially other layering problems that can be cleaned up
as a result, or in a similar manner.
The refactoring was OK'd by Anton Korobeynikov on llvmdev.
Note: this touches the target interfaces, so out-of-tree targets may
be affected.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@175788 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the alignment is clamped to TargetFrameLowering.getStackAlignment if the target
does not support stack realignment or the option "realign-stack" is off.
This will cause miscompile if the address is treated as aligned and add is
replaced with or in DAGCombine.
Added a bool StackRealignable to TargetFrameLowering to check whether stack
realignment is implemented for the target. Also added a bool RealignOption
to MachineFrameInfo to check whether the option "realign-stack" is on.
rdar://12713765
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169197 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
AKA: Recompile *ALL* the source code!
This one went much better. No manual edits here. I spot-checked for
silliness and grep-checked for really broken edits and everything seemed
good. It all still compiles. Yell if you see something that looks goofy.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169133 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
X86. Modify the pass added in the previous patch to call this new
code.
This new prologues generated will call a libgcc routine (__morestack)
to allocate more stack space from the heap when required
Patch by Sanjoy Das.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@138812 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
