This follows up on the related AVX instruction transforms, but this
one is too strange to do anything more with. Intel's behavioral
description of this instruction in its Software Developer's Manual
is tragi-comic.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263340 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This intrinsic, together with deoptimization operand bundles, allow
frontends to express transfer of control and frame-local state from
one (typically more specialized, hence faster) version of a function
into another (typically more generic, hence slower) version.
In languages with a fully integrated managed runtime this intrinsic can
be used to implement "uncommon trap" like functionality. In unmanaged
languages like C and C++, this intrinsic can be used to represent the
slow paths of specialized functions.
Note: this change does not address how `@llvm.experimental_deoptimize`
is lowered. That will be done in a later change.
Reviewers: chandlerc, rnk, atrick, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kmod, mjacob, maksfb, mcrosier, JosephTremoulet
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17732
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263281 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Value profile instrumentation treats inline asm calls like they are
indirect calls. This causes problems when the 'Callee' is passed to a
ptrtoint cast -- the verifier rightly claims that this is bogus and
crashes opt.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263278 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch adds support for including a full reference graph including
call graph edges and other GV references in the summary.
The reference graph edges can be used to make importing decisions
without materializing any source modules, can be used in the plugin
to make file staging decisions for distributed build systems, and is
expected to have other uses.
The call graph edges are recorded in each function summary in the
bitcode via a list of <CalleeValueIds, StaticCount> tuples when no PGO
data exists, or <CalleeValueId, StaticCount, ProfileCount> pairs when
there is PGO, where the ValueId can be mapped to the function GUID via
the ValueSymbolTable. In the function index in memory, the call graph
edges reference the target via the CalleeGUID instead of the
CalleeValueId.
The reference graph edges are recorded in each summary record with a
list of referenced value IDs, which can be mapped to value GUID via the
ValueSymbolTable.
Addtionally, a new summary record type is added to record references
from global variable initializers. A number of bitcode records and data
structures have been renamed to reflect the newly expanded scope of the
summary beyond functions. More cleanup will follow.
Reviewers: joker.eph, davidxl
Subscribers: joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17212
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263275 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Following r263086, we are replacing this by a runtime check.
More cleanup will follow on the IRBuilder itself, but I submitted
this patch separately as SROA has a fancy "prefixInserter" class
that needs extra-love.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18022
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263256 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
member type.
Because of how this type is used by the ValueTable, it cannot actually
have hidden visibility. GCC actually nicely warns about this but Clang
just silently ... I don't even know. =/ We should do a better job either
way though.
This should resolve a bunch of the GCC warnings about visibility that
the port of GVN triggered and make the visibility story a bit more
correct.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263250 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
much to my horror, so use variables to fix it in place.
This terrifies me. Both basic-aa and memdep will provide more precise
information when the domtree and/or the loop info is available. Because
of this, if your pass (like GVN) requires domtree, and then queries
memdep or basic-aa, it will get more precise results. If it does this in
the other order, it gets less precise results.
All of the ideas I have for fixing this are, essentially, terrible. Here
I've just caused us to stop having unspecified behavior as different
implementations evaluate the order of these arguments differently. I'm
actually rather glad that they do, or the fragility of memdep and
basic-aa would have gone on unnoticed. I've left comments so we don't
immediately break this again. This should fix bots whose host compilers
evaluate the order of arguments differently from Clang.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263231 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This was originally a pointer to support pass managers which didn't use
AnalysisManagers. However, that doesn't realistically come up much and
the complexity of supporting it doesn't really make sense.
In fact, *many* parts of the pass manager were just assuming the pointer
was never null already. This at least makes it much more explicit and
clear.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263219 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Since the names are used in a loop this does more work in debug builds. In
release builds value names are generally discarded so we don't have to do
the concatenation at all. It's also simpler code, no functional change
intended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263215 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
tests to run GVN in both modes.
This is mostly the boring refactoring just like SROA and other complex
transformation passes. There is some trickiness in that GVN's
ValueNumber class requires hand holding to get to compile cleanly. I'm
open to suggestions about a better pattern there, but I tried several
before settling on this. I was trying to balance my desire to sink as
much implementation detail into the source file as possible without
introducing overly many layers of abstraction.
Much like with SROA, the design of this system is made somewhat more
cumbersome by the need to support both pass managers without duplicating
the significant state and logic of the pass. The same compromise is
struck here.
I've also left a FIXME in a doxygen comment as the GVN pass seems to
have pretty woeful documentation within it. I'd like to submit this with
the FIXME and let those more deeply familiar backfill the information
here now that we have a nice place in an interface to put that kind of
documentaiton.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18019
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263208 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm::getDISubprogram walks the instructions in a function, looking for one in the scope of the current function, so that it can find the !dbg entry for the subprogram itself.
Now that !dbg is attached to functions, this should not be necessary. This patch changes all uses to just query the subprogram directly on the function.
Ideally this should be NFC, but in reality its possible that a function:
has no !dbg (in which case there's likely a bug somewhere in an opt pass), or
that none of the instructions had a scope referencing the function, so we used to not find the !dbg on the function but now we will
Reviewed by Duncan Exon Smith.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18074
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263184 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The code assumed that we always had a preheader without making the pass
dependent on LoopSimplify.
Thanks to Mattias Eriksson V for reporting this.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263173 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
of, and I misdiagnosed for months and months.
Andrea has had a patch for this forever, but I just couldn't see how
it was fixing the root cause of the problem. It didn't make sense to me,
even though the patch was perfectly good and the analysis of the actual
failure event was *fantastic*.
Well, I came back to it today because the patch has sat for *far* too
long and needs attention and decided I wouldn't let it go until I really
understood what was going on. After quite some time in the debugger,
I finally realized that in fact I had just missed an important case with
my previous attempt to fix PR22093 in r225149. Not only do we need to
handle loads that won't be split, but stores-of-loads that we won't
split. We *do* actually have enough logic in the presplitting to form
new slices for split stores.... *unless* we decided not to split them!
I'm so sorry that it took me this long to come to the realization that
this is the issue. It seems so obvious in hind sight (of course).
Anyways, the fix becomes *much* smaller and more focused. The fact that
we're left doing integer smashing is related to the FIXME in my original
commit: fundamentally, we're not aggressive about pre-splitting for
loads and stores to the same alloca. If we want to get aggressive about
this, it'll need both what Andrea had put into the proposed fix, but
also a *lot* more logic to essentially iteratively pre-split the alloca
until we can't do any more. As I said in that commit log, its really
unclear that this is the right call. Instead, the integer blending and
letting targets lower this to narrower stores seems slightly better. But
we definitely shouldn't really go down that path just to fix this bug.
Again, tons of thanks are owed to Andrea and others at Sony for working
on this bug. I really should have seen what was going on here and
re-directed them sooner. =////
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263121 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We already have the instruction extracted into 'I', just cast that to
a store the way we do for loads. Also, we don't enter the if unless SI
is non-null, so don't test it again for null.
I'm pretty sure the entire test there can be nuked, but this is just the
trivial cleanup.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263112 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
need to be changed for porting to the new pass manager.
Also sink the comment on the ValueTable class back to that class instead
of it dangling on an anonymous namespace.
No functionality changed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263084 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a fairly straightforward port to the new pass manager with one
exception. It removes a very questionable use of releaseMemory() in
the old pass to invalidate its caches between runs on a function.
I don't think this is really guaranteed to be safe. I've just used the
more direct port to the new PM to address this by nuking the results
object each time the pass runs. While this could cause some minor malloc
traffic increase, I don't expect the compile time performance hit to be
noticable, and it makes the correctness and other aspects of the pass
much easier to reason about. In some cases, it may make things faster by
making the sets and maps smaller with better locality. Indeed, the
measurements collected by Bruno (thanks!!!) show mostly compile time
improvements.
There is sadly very limited testing at this point as there are only two
tests of memdep, and both rely on GVN. I'll be porting GVN next and that
will exercise this heavily though.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17962
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263082 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch teaches LICM's implementation of store promotion to exploit the fact that the memory location being accessed might be provable thread local. The fact it's thread local weakens the requirements for where we can insert stores since no other thread can observe the write. This allows us perform store promotion even in cases where the store is not guaranteed to execute in the loop.
Two key assumption worth drawing out is that this assumes a) no-capture is strong enough to imply no-escape, and b) standard allocation functions like malloc, calloc, and operator new return values which can be assumed not to have previously escaped.
In future work, it would be nice to generalize this so that it works without directly seeing the allocation site. I believe that the nocapture return attribute should be suitable for this purpose, but haven't investigated carefully. It's also likely that we could support unescaped allocas with similar reasoning, but since SROA and Mem2Reg should destroy those, they're less interesting than they first might seem.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16783
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263072 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Extract out a generic interface from a recently landed patch and document a TODO in case compile time becomes a problem.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263062 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When checking whether an smin is positive, we can move the comparison to one of the inputs if the other is known positive. If the known positive one is the min, then the other can't be negative. If the other is the min, then we compute the min.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17873
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263059 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I somehow missed this. The case in GCC (global_alloc) was similar to
the new testcase except it had an array of structs rather than a two
dimensional array.
Fixes RP26885.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263058 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As part of r251146 InstCombine was extended to call computeKnownBits on
every value in the function to determine whether it happens to be
constant. This increases typical compiletime by 1-3% (5% in irgen+opt
time) in my measurements. On the other hand this case did not trigger
once in the whole llvm-testsuite.
This patch introduces the notion of ExpensiveCombines which are only
enabled for OptLevel > 2. I removed the check in InstructionSimplify as
that is called from various places where the OptLevel is not known but
given the rarity of the situation I think a check in InstCombine is
enough.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16835
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263047 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Original commit message:
calculate builtin_object_size if argument is a removable pointer
This patch fixes calculating correct value for builtin_object_size function
when pointer is used only in builtin_object_size function call and never
after that.
Patch by Strahinja Petrovic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17337
Reland the original change with a small modification (first do a null check
and then do the cast) to satisfy ubsan.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263011 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
TSan instrumentation functions for atomic stores, loads, and cmpxchg work on
integer value types. This patch adds casts before calling TSan instrumentation
functions in cases where the value is a pointer.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17833
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@262876 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This lets select sub-targets enable this pass. The patch implements the
idea from the recent llvm-dev thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/94925
The goal is to enable the LoopDataPrefetch pass for the Cyclone
sub-target only within Aarch64.
Positive and negative tests will be included in an upcoming patch that
enables selective prefetching of large-strided accesses on Cyclone.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@262844 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r262250.
It causes SPEC2006/gcc to generate wrong result (166.s) in AArch64 when
running with *ref* data set. The error happens with
"-Ofast -flto -fuse-ld=gold" or "-O3 -fno-strict-aliasing".
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@262839 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This code has been successfully used to bootstrap libc++ in a no-asserts
mode for a very long time, so the code that follows cannot be completely
incorrect. I've added a test that shows the current behavior for this
kind of code with DFSan. If it is desirable for DFSan to do something
special when processing an invoke of a variadic function, it can be
added, but we shouldn't keep an assert that we've been ignoring due to
release builds anyways.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@262829 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
