The style guide states that the explicit `inline`
should not be used with inline methods. classof is
very common inline method with a fair amount on
inconsistency:
$ git grep classof ./include | grep inline | wc -l
230
$ git grep classof ./include | grep -v inline | wc -l
257
I chose to target this method rather the larger change
since this method is easily cargo-culted (I did it at
least once). I considered doing the larger change and
removing all occurrences but that would be a much larger
change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33906
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@306731 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@304787 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
block.
This allows writing much more natural and readable range based for loops
directly over the PHI nodes. It also takes advantage of the same tricks
for terminating the sequence as the hand coded versions.
I've replaced one example of this mostly to showcase the difference and
I've added a unit test to make sure the facilities really work the way
they're intended. I want to use this inside of SimpleLoopUnswitch but it
seems generally nice.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33533
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303964 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Implements PR889
Removing the virtual table pointer from Value saves 1% of RSS when doing
LTO of llc on Linux. The impact on time was positive, but too noisy to
conclusively say that performance improved. Here is a link to the
spreadsheet with the original data:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F4FHir0qYnV0MEp2sYYp_BuvnJgWlWPhWOwZ6LbW7W4/edit?usp=sharing
This change makes it invalid to directly delete a Value, User, or
Instruction pointer. Instead, such code can be rewritten to a null check
and a call Value::deleteValue(). Value objects tend to have their
lifetimes managed through iplist, so for the most part, this isn't a big
deal. However, there are some places where LLVM deletes values, and
those places had to be migrated to deleteValue. I have also created
llvm::unique_value, which has a custom deleter, so it can be used in
place of std::unique_ptr<Value>.
I had to add the "DerivedUser" Deleter escape hatch for MemorySSA, which
derives from User outside of lib/IR. Code in IR cannot include MemorySSA
headers or call the MemoryAccess object destructors without introducing
a circular dependency, so we need some level of indirection.
Unfortunately, no class derived from User may have any virtual methods,
because adding a virtual method would break User::getHungOffOperands(),
which assumes that it can find the use list immediately prior to the
User object. I've added a static_assert to the appropriate OperandTraits
templates to help people avoid this trap.
Reviewers: chandlerc, mehdi_amini, pete, dberlin, george.burgess.iv
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: krytarowski, eraman, george.burgess.iv, mzolotukhin, Prazek, nlewycky, hans, inglorion, pcc, tejohnson, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31261
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303362 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
During post-commit review of a previous change I made it was pointed out that const casting 'this' is technically a bad practice. This patch re-implements all of the methods in BasicBlock that do this to use the const BasicBlock version and const_cast the return value instead.
I think there are still many other classes that do similar things. I may look at more in the future.
Reviewers: dblaikie
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31377
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@298827 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I noticed that this function got called twice in compiled code to create succ_begin and succ_end iterators. Adding this directive helps the compiler share the call.
Ideally we'd just make this method available for inlining since its quite simple, but the current header file arrangements don't allow that.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@292754 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Remove all the dead code around ilist_*sentinel_traits. This is a
follow-up to gutting them as part of r279314 (originally r278974),
staged to prevent broken builds in sub-projects.
Uses were removed from clang in r279457 and lld in r279458.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@279473 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r268254.
This change causes assertion failures while building Chromium. Reduced
test case coming soon.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@268288 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Make it possible that TryToSimplifyUncondBranchFromEmptyBlock merges empty
basic block including lifetime intrinsics as well as phi nodes and
unconditional branch into its successor or predecessor(s).
If successor of empty block has single predecessor, all contents including
lifetime intrinsics are sinked into the successor. Otherwise, they are
hoisted into its predecessor(s) and then merged into the predecessor(s).
Patch by Josh Yoon <josh.yoon@samsung.com>!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19257
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@268254 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This intrinsic, together with deoptimization operand bundles, allow
frontends to express transfer of control and frame-local state from
one (typically more specialized, hence faster) version of a function
into another (typically more generic, hence slower) version.
In languages with a fully integrated managed runtime this intrinsic can
be used to implement "uncommon trap" like functionality. In unmanaged
languages like C and C++, this intrinsic can be used to represent the
slow paths of specialized functions.
Note: this change does not address how `@llvm.experimental_deoptimize`
is lowered. That will be done in a later change.
Reviewers: chandlerc, rnk, atrick, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kmod, mjacob, maksfb, mcrosier, JosephTremoulet
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17732
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263281 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Re-implement `ilist_node::getNextNode()` and `getPrevNode()` without
relying on the sentinel having a "next" pointer. Instead, get access to
the owning list and compare against the `begin()` and `end()` iterators.
This only works when the node *can* get access to the owning list. The
new support is in `ilist_node_with_parent<>`, and any class `Ty`
inheriting from `ilist_node<NodeTy>` that wants `getNextNode()` and/or
`getPrevNode()` should inherit from
`ilist_node_with_parent<NodeTy, ParentTy>` instead. The requirements:
- `NodeTy` must have a `getParent()` function that returns the parent.
- `ParentTy` must have a `getSublistAccess()` static that, given a(n
ignored) `NodeTy*` (to determine which list), returns a member field
pointer to the appropriate `ilist<>`.
This isn't the cleanest way to get access to the owning list, but it
leverages the API already used in the IR hierarchy (see, e.g.,
`Instruction::getSublistAccess()`).
If anyone feels like ripping out the calls to `getNextNode()` and
`getPrevNode()` and replacing with direct iterator logic, they can also
remove the access function, etc., but as an incremental step, I'm
maintaining the API where it's currently used in tree.
If these requirements are *not* met, call sites with access to the ilist
can call `iplist<NodeTy>::getNextNode(NodeTy*)` directly, as in
ilistTest.cpp.
Why rewrite this?
The old code was broken, calling `getNext()` on a sentinel that possibly
didn't have a "next" pointer at all! The new code avoids that
particular flavour of UB (see the commit message for r252538 for more
details about the "lucky" memory layout that made this function so
interesting).
There's still some UB here: the end iterator gets downcast to `NodeTy*`,
even when it's a sentinel (which is typically
`ilist_half_node<NodeTy*>`). I'll tackle that in follow-up commits.
See this llvm-dev thread for more details:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/091115.html
What's the danger?
There might be some code that relies on `getNextNode()` or
`getPrevNode()` *never* returning `nullptr` -- i.e., that relies on them
being broken when the sentinel is an `ilist_half_node<NodeTy>`. I tried
to root out those cases with the audits I did leading up to r252380, but
it's possible I missed one or two. I hope not.
(If (1) you have out-of-tree code, (2) you've reverted r252380
temporarily, and (3) you get some weird crashes with this commit, then I
recommend un-reverting r252380 and auditing the compile errors looking
for "strange" implicit conversions.)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252694 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Besides the usual, I finally added an overload to
`BasicBlock::splitBasicBlock()` that accepts an `Instruction*` instead
of `BasicBlock::iterator`. Someone can go back and remove this overload
later (after updating the callers I'm going to skip going forward), but
the most common call seems to be
`BB->splitBasicBlock(BB->getTerminator(), ...)` and I'm not sure it's
better to add `->getIterator()` to every one than have the overload.
It's pretty hard to get the usage wrong.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@250745 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Create `SymbolTableList`, a wrapper around `iplist` for lists that
automatically manage a symbol table. This commit reduces a ton of code
duplication between the six traits classes that were used previously.
As a drive by, reduce the number of template parameters from 2 to 1 by
using a SymbolTableListParentType metafunction (I originally had this as
a separate commit, but it touched most of the same lines so I squashed
them).
I'm in the process of trying to remove the UB in `createSentinel()` (see
the FIXMEs I added for `ilist_embedded_sentinel_traits` and
`ilist_half_embedded_sentinel_traits`). My eventual goal is to separate
the list logic into a base class layer that knows nothing about (and
isn't templated on) the downcasted nodes -- removing the need to invoke
UB -- but for now I'm just trying to get a handle on all the current use
cases (and cleaning things up as I see them).
Besides these six SymbolTable lists, there are two others that use the
addNode/removeNode/transferNodes() hooks: the `MachineInstruction` and
`MachineBasicBlock` lists. Ideally there'll be a way to factor these
hooks out of the low-level API entirely, but I'm not quite there yet.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@249602 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The only specializations of `getSymTab()` were identical to the default
defined in `SymbolTableListTraits::getSymTab()`. Remove the
specializations, and stop treating it like a configuration point. Just
to be sure no one else accesses this, make it private.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@249469 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This introduces new instructions neccessary to implement MSVC-compatible
exception handling support. Most of the middle-end and none of the
back-end haven't been audited or updated to take them into account.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11097
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@243766 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This introduces new instructions neccessary to implement MSVC-compatible
exception handling support. Most of the middle-end and none of the
back-end haven't been audited or updated to take them into account.
Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, reames, nlewycky, rjmccall
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11041
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241888 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@240137 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
While working on another change, I noticed that the naming in this function was mildly deceptive. While fixing that, I took the oppurtunity to modernize some of the code. NFC intended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@238252 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This is a pass for speculative execution of instructions for simple if-then (triangle) control flow. It's aimed at GPUs, but could perhaps be used in other contexts. Enabling this pass gives us a 1.0% geomean improvement on Google benchmark suites, with one benchmark improving 33%.
Credit goes to Jingyue Wu for writing an earlier version of this pass.
Patched by Bjarke Roune.
Test Plan:
This patch adds a set of tests in test/Transforms/SpeculativeExecution/spec.ll
The pass is controlled by a flag which defaults to having the pass not run.
Reviewers: eliben, dberlin, meheff, jingyue, hfinkel
Reviewed By: jingyue, hfinkel
Subscribers: majnemer, jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9360
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237459 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The patch is generated using clang-tidy misc-use-override check.
This command was used:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py \
-checks='-*,misc-use-override' -header-filter='llvm|clang' \
-j=32 -fix -format
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8925
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@234679 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This pass is responsible for figuring out where to place call safepoints and safepoint polls. It doesn't actually make the relocations explicit; that's the job of the RewriteStatepointsForGC pass (http://reviews.llvm.org/D6975).
Note that this code is not yet finalized. Its moving in tree for incremental development, but further cleanup is needed and will happen over the next few days. It is not yet part of the standard pass order.
Planned changes in the near future:
- I plan on restructuring the statepoint rewrite to use the functions add to the IRBuilder a while back.
- In the current pass, the function "gc.safepoint_poll" is treated specially but is not an intrinsic. I plan to make identifying the poll function a property of the GCStrategy at some point in the near future.
- As follow on patches, I will be separating a collection of test cases we have out of tree and submitting them upstream.
- It's not explicit in the code, but these two patches are introducing a new state for a statepoint which looks a lot like a patchpoint. There's no a transient form which doesn't yet have the relocations explicitly represented, but does prevent reordering of memory operations. Once this is in, I need to update actually make this explicit by reserving the 'unused' argument of the statepoint as a flag, updating the docs, and making the code explicitly check for such a thing. This wasn't really planned, but once I split the two passes - which was done for other reasons - the intermediate state fell out. Just reminds us once again that we need to merge statepoints and patchpoints at some point in the not that distant future.
Future directions planned:
- Identifying more cases where a backedge safepoint isn't required to ensure timely execution of a safepoint poll.
- Tweaking the insertion process to generate easier to optimize IR. (For example, investigating making SplitBackedge) the default.
- Adding opt-in flags for a GCStrategy to use this pass. Once done, add this pass to the actual pass ordering.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6981
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228090 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Although unlinked `BasicBlock`s can be created, there's currently no way
to insert them into `Function`s after the fact. In particular,
`moveAfter()` and `moveBefore()` require that the basic block is already
linked.
Extract the logic for initially linking a `BasicBlock` out of the
constructor and into a member function that can be used for lazy
insertion.
- Asserts that the basic block is currently unlinked.
- Matches the logic of the constructor.
- Changed the constructor to use it since the logic matches.
This is needed in a follow-up commit for PR5680.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214563 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Eventually DataLayoutPass should go away, but for now that is the only easy
way to get a DataLayout in some APIs. This patch only changes the ones that
have easy access to a Module.
One interesting issue with sometimes using DataLayoutPass and sometimes
fetching it from the Module is that we have to make sure they are equivalent.
We can get most of the way there by always constructing the pass with a Module.
In fact, the pass could be changed to point to an external DataLayout instead
of owning one to make this stricter.
Unfortunately, the C api passes a DataLayout, so it has to be up to the caller
to make sure the pass and the module are in sync.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202204 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the things, and renames it to CBindingWrapping.h. I also moved
CBindingWrapping.h into Support/.
This new file just contains the macros for defining different wrap/unwrap
methods.
The calls to those macros, as well as any custom wrap/unwrap definitions
(like for array of Values for example), are put into corresponding C++
headers.
Doing this required some #include surgery, since some .cpp files relied
on the fact that including Wrap.h implicitly caused the inclusion of a
bunch of other things.
This also now means that the C++ headers will include their corresponding
C API headers; for example Value.h must include llvm-c/Core.h. I think
this is harmless, since the C API headers contain just external function
declarations and some C types, so I don't believe there should be any
nasty dependency issues here.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@180881 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171366 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
