This is intended to be a superset of the functionality from D31037 (EarlyCSE) but implemented
as an independent pass, so there's no stretching of scope and feature creep for an existing pass.
I also proposed a weaker version of this for SimplifyCFG in D30910. And I initially had almost
this same functionality as an addition to CGP in the motivating example of PR31028:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31028
The advantage of positioning this ahead of SimplifyCFG in the pass pipeline is that it can allow
more flattening. But it needs to be after passes (InstCombine) that could sink a div/rem and
undo the hoisting that is done here.
Decomposing remainder may allow removing some code from the backend (PPC and possibly others).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37121
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@312862 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
GlobalExtensions is dereferenced twice, once for iteration and then a check if it is empty.
As a ManagedStatic this dereference forces it's construction which is unnecessary.
Reviewers: efriedma, davide, mehdi_amini
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: chapuni, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33381
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@307229 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: Fixes an issue using RegisterStandardPasses from a statically linked object before PassManagerBuilder::addGlobalExtension is called from a dynamic library.
Reviewers: efriedma, theraven
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33515
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@305303 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Use MemorySSA for memory dependency checking in the EarlyCSE pass at the
start of the function simplification portion of the pipeline. We rely
on the fact that GVNHoist runs just after this pass of EarlyCSE to
amortize the MemorySSA construction cost since GVNHoist uses MemorySSA
and EarlyCSE preserves it.
This is turned off by default. A follow-up change will turn it on to
allow for easier reversion in case it breaks something.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@305146 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The whole-program-devirt pass needs to run at -O0 because only it
knows about the llvm.type.checked.load intrinsic: it needs to both
lower the intrinsic itself and handle it in the summary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33571
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@304019 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch provides an initial prototype for a pass that sinks instructions based on GVN information, similar to GVNHoist. It is not yet ready for commiting but I've uploaded it to gather some initial thoughts.
This pass attempts to sink instructions into successors, reducing static
instruction count and enabling if-conversion.
We use a variant of global value numbering to decide what can be sunk.
Consider:
[ %a1 = add i32 %b, 1 ] [ %c1 = add i32 %d, 1 ]
[ %a2 = xor i32 %a1, 1 ] [ %c2 = xor i32 %c1, 1 ]
\ /
[ %e = phi i32 %a2, %c2 ]
[ add i32 %e, 4 ]
GVN would number %a1 and %c1 differently because they compute different
results - the VN of an instruction is a function of its opcode and the
transitive closure of its operands. This is the key property for hoisting
and CSE.
What we want when sinking however is for a numbering that is a function of
the *uses* of an instruction, which allows us to answer the question "if I
replace %a1 with %c1, will it contribute in an equivalent way to all
successive instructions?". The (new) PostValueTable class in GVN provides this
mapping.
This pass has some shown really impressive improvements especially for codesize already on internal benchmarks, so I have high hopes it can replace all the sinking logic in SimplifyCFG.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24805
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303850 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently, this pass only focuses on *trivial* loop unswitching. At that
reduced problem it remains significantly better than the current loop
unswitch:
- Old pass is worse than cubic complexity. New pass is (I think) linear.
- New pass is much simpler in its design by focusing on full unswitching. (See
below for details on this).
- New pass doesn't carry state for thresholds between pass iterations.
- New pass doesn't carry state for correctness (both miscompile and
infloop) between pass iterations.
- New pass produces substantially better code after unswitching.
- New pass can handle more trivial unswitch cases.
- New pass doesn't recompute the dominator tree for the entire function
and instead incrementally updates it.
I've ported all of the trivial unswitching test cases from the old pass
to the new one to make sure that major functionality isn't lost in the
process. For several of the test cases I've worked to improve the
precision and rigor of the CHECKs, but for many I've just updated them
to handle the new IR produced.
My initial motivation was the fact that the old pass carried state in
very unreliable ways between pass iterations, and these mechansims were
incompatible with the new pass manager. However, I discovered many more
improvements to make along the way.
This pass makes two very significant assumptions that enable most of these
improvements:
1) Focus on *full* unswitching -- that is, completely removing whatever
control flow construct is being unswitched from the loop. In the case
of trivial unswitching, this means removing the trivial (exiting)
edge. In non-trivial unswitching, this means removing the branch or
switch itself. This is in opposition to *partial* unswitching where
some part of the unswitched control flow remains in the loop. Partial
unswitching only really applies to switches and to folded branches.
These are very similar to full unrolling and partial unrolling. The
full form is an effective canonicalization, the partial form needs
a complex cost model, cannot be iterated, isn't canonicalizing, and
should be a separate pass that runs very late (much like unrolling).
2) Leverage LLVM's Loop machinery to the fullest. The original unswitch
dates from a time when a great deal of LLVM's loop infrastructure was
missing, ineffective, and/or unreliable. As a consequence, a lot of
complexity was added which we no longer need.
With these two overarching principles, I think we can build a fast and
effective unswitcher that fits in well in the new PM and in the
canonicalization pipeline. Some of the remaining functionality around
partial unswitching may not be relevant today (not many test cases or
benchmarks I can find) but if they are I'd like to add support for them
as a separate layer that runs very late in the pipeline.
Purely to make reviewing and introducing this code more manageable, I've
split this into first a trivial-unswitch-only pass and in the next patch
I'll add support for full non-trivial unswitching against a *fixed*
threshold, exactly like full unrolling. I even plan to re-use the
unrolling thresholds, as these are incredibly similar cost tradeoffs:
we're cloning a loop body in order to end up with simplified control
flow. We should only do that when the total growth is reasonably small.
One of the biggest changes with this pass compared to the previous one
is that previously, each individual trivial exiting edge from a switch
was unswitched separately as a branch. Now, we unswitch the entire
switch at once, with cases going to the various destinations. This lets
us unswitch multiple exiting edges in a single operation and also avoids
numerous extremely bad behaviors, where we would introduce 1000s of
branches to test for thousands of possible values, all of which would
take the exact same exit path bypassing the loop. Now we will use
a switch with 1000s of cases that can be efficiently lowered into
a jumptable. This avoids relying on somehow forming a switch out of the
branches or getting horrible code if that fails for any reason.
Another significant change is that this pass actively updates the CFG
based on unswitching. For trivial unswitching, this is actually very
easy because of the definition of loop simplified form. Doing this makes
the code coming out of loop unswitch dramatically more friendly. We
still should run loop-simplifycfg (at the least) after this to clean up,
but it will have to do a lot less work.
Finally, this pass makes much fewer attempts to simplify instructions
based on the unswitch. Something like loop-instsimplify, instcombine, or
GVN can be used to do increasingly powerful simplifications based on the
now dominating predicate. The old simplifications are things that
something like loop-instsimplify should get today or a very, very basic
loop-instcombine could get. Keeping that logic separate is a big
simplifying technique.
Most of the code in this pass that isn't in the old one has to do with
achieving specific goals:
- Updating the dominator tree as we go
- Unswitching all cases in a switch in a single step.
I think it is still shorter than just the trivial unswitching code in
the old pass despite having this functionality.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32409
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@301576 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Otherwise we might end up with some empty basic blocks or
single-entry-single-exit basic blocks.
This fixes PR32085
Reviewers: chandlerc, danielcdh
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30468
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@301395 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
... in the per-TU -O0 pipeline.
The problem is that there could be passes registered using
`addExtensionsToPM()` introducing unnamed globals.
Asan is an example, but there may be others. Building cppcheck
with `-flto=thin` and `-fsanitize=address` triggers an assertion
while we're reading bitcode (in lib/LTO), as the BitcodeReader
assumes there are no unnamed globals (because the namer has run).
Unfortunately I wasn't able to find an easy way to test this.
I added a comment in the hope nobody moves this again.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@301102 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch optimizes two memory intrinsic operations: memset and memcpy based
on the profiled size of the operation. The high level transformation is like:
mem_op(..., size)
==>
switch (size) {
case s1:
mem_op(..., s1);
goto merge_bb;
case s2:
mem_op(..., s2);
goto merge_bb;
...
default:
mem_op(..., size);
goto merge_bb;
}
merge_bb:
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D28966
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@299446 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The first variant contains all current transformations except
transforming switches into lookup tables. The second variant
contains all current transformations.
The switch-to-lookup-table conversion results in code that is more
difficult to analyze and optimize by other passes. Most importantly,
it can inhibit Dead Code Elimination. As such it is often beneficial to
only apply this transformation very late. A common example is inlining,
which can often result in range restrictions for the switch expression.
Changes in execution time according to LNT:
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fp-convert +3.03%
MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/CrystalMk/CrystalMk -11.20%
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/perimeter/perimeter -10.43%
and a couple of smaller changes. For perimeter it also results 2.6%
a smaller binary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30333
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@298799 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
loop unrolling and icp will make the sample profile annotation much harder in the backend. So disable these 2 optimization in the ThinLTO compile phase.
Will add a test in cfe in a separate patch.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31217
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@298646 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Loop unswitching can be extremely harmful for a SIMT target. In case
if hoisted condition is not uniform a SIMT machine will execute both
clones of a loop sequentially. Therefor LoopUnswitch checks if the
condition is non-divergent.
Since DivergenceAnalysis adds an expensive PostDominatorTree analysis
not needed for non-SIMT targets a new option is added to avoid unneded
analysis initialization. The method getAnalysisUsage is called when
TargetTransformInfo is not yet available and we cannot use it here.
For that reason a new field DivergentTarget is added to PassManagerBuilder
to control the behavior and set this field from a target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30796
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@298104 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This re-applies r289696, which caused TSan perf regression, which has
since been addressed in separate changes (see PR for details).
See PR31382.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@296759 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: SamplePGO uses branch_weight annotation to represent callsite hotness. When ICP promotes an indirect call to direct call, we need to make sure the direct call is annotated with branch_weight in SamplePGO mode, so that downstream function inliner can use hot callsite heuristic.
Reviewers: davidxl, eraman, xur
Reviewed By: davidxl, xur
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30282
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@296028 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In r267672, where the loop distribution pragma was introduced, I tried
it hard to keep the old behavior for opt: when opt is invoked
with -loop-distribute, it should distribute the loop (it's off by
default when ran via the optimization pipeline).
As MichaelZ has discovered this has the unintended consequence of
breaking a very common developer work-flow to reproduce compilations
using opt: First you print the pass pipeline of clang
with -debug-pass=Arguments and then invoking opt with the returned
arguments.
clang -debug-pass will include -loop-distribute but the pass is invoked
with default=off so nothing happens unless the loop carries the pragma.
While through opt (default=on) we will try to distribute all loops.
This changes opt's default to off as well to match clang. The tests are
modified to explicitly enable the transformation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290235 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: We used to create SampleProfileLoader pass in clang. This makes LTO/ThinLTO unable to add this pass in the linker plugin. This patch moves the SampleProfileLoader pass creation from clang to llvm pass manager builder.
Reviewers: tejohnson, davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27743
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289714 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Move GVNHoist to later in the optimization pipeline, specifically, to
the function simplification part of the pipeline. The new pipeline
location allows GVNHoist to run on a function after its callees have
been inlined but before the function has been considered for inlining
into its callers, exposing more opportunities for hoisting.
Performance results on AArch64 kryo:
Improvements:
Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench -24.952%
spec2006/bzip2 -4.071%
internal bmark -3.177%
Benchmarks/PAQ8p/paq8p -1.754%
spec2000/perlbmk -1.328%
spec2006/h264ref -1.140%
Regressions:
internal bmark +1.818%
Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign +1.084%
Reviewers: sebpop, dberlin, hiraditya
Subscribers: aemerson, mehdi_amini, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27722
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289696 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: We used to create SampleProfileLoader pass in clang. This makes LTO/ThinLTO unable to add this pass in the linker plugin. This patch moves the SampleProfileLoader pass creation from clang to llvm pass manager builder.
Reviewers: tejohnson, davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27743
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289669 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: For functions with profile data, we are confident that loop sink will be optimal in sinking code.
Reviewers: davidxl, hfinkel
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26155
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@286325 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
