Summary:
Variadic functions can be treated in the same way as normal functions
with respect to the number and types of parameters.
Reviewers: grosbach, olista01, t.p.northover, rengolin
Subscribers: javed.absar, aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26748
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@287219 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
One half of the shifts obviously needed conditional selection based on whether
the shift amount is more than 32-bits, but leaving the other half as the
natural shift isn't acceptable either: it's undefined behaviour to shift a
32-bit value by more than 31.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@287149 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch adds the Sched Machine Model for Cortex-R52.
Details of the pipeline and descriptions are in comments
in file ARMScheduleR52.td included in this patch.
Reviewers: rengolin, jmolloy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26500
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@286949 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For example we were producing
push {r8, r10, r11, r4, r5, r7, lr}
This is misleading (r4, r5 and r7 are actually pushed before the rest), and
other components (stack folding recently) often forget to deal with the extra
complexity coming from the different order, leading to miscompiles. Finally, we
warn about our own code in -no-integrated-as mode without this, which is really
not a good idea.
Fixed usage of std::sort so that we (hopefully) use instantiations that
actually exist in GCC 4.8.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@286881 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit 286866. It broke a bot, something to do with exactly which
templates std::sort accepts.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@286867 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For example we were producing
push {r8, r10, r11, r4, r5, r7, lr}
This is misleading (r4, r5 and r7 are actually pushed before the rest), and
other components (stack folding recently) often forget to deal with the extra
complexity coming from the different order, leading to miscompiles. Finally, we
warn about our own code in -no-integrated-as mode without this, which is really
not a good idea.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@286866 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a partial revert of r244615 (http://reviews.llvm.org/D11942),
which caused a major regression in debug info quality.
Turning the artificial __MergedGlobal symbols into private symbols
(l__MergedGlobal) means that the linker will not include them in the
symbol table of the final executable. Without a symbol table entry
dsymutil is not be able to process the debug info for any of the
merged globals and thus drops the debug info for all of them.
This patch is enabling the old behavior for all MachO targets while
leaving all other targets unaffected.
rdar://problem/29160481
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26531
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@286607 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
addSchedBarrierDeps() is supposed to add use operands to the ExitSU
node. The current implementation adds uses for calls/barrier instruction
and the MBB live-outs in all other cases. The use
operands of conditional jump instructions were missed.
Also added code to macrofusion to set the latencies between nodes to
zero to avoid problems with the fusing nodes lingering around in the
pending list now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25140
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@286544 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When the base register (register pointing to the jump table) is the PC, we expect the jump table to directly follow the jump sequence with no intervening padding.
If there is intervening padding, the calculated offsets will not be correct. One solution would be to account for any padding in the emitted LDRB instruction, but at the moment we don't support emitting MCExprs for the load offset.
In the meantime, it's correct and only a slight amount worse to just move the padding up, from just before the jump table to just before the jump instruction sequence. We can do that by emitting code alignment before the jump sequence, as we know the number of instructions in the sequence is always 4.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@286107 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This handles the last case of the builtin function calls that we would
generate code which differed from Microsoft's ABI. Rather than
generating a call to `__pow{d,s}i2` we now promote the parameter to a
float or double and invoke `powf` or `pow` instead.
Addresses PR30825!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@286082 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: ARMv6m supports dmb etc fench instructions but not ldrex/strex etc. So for some atomic load/store, LLVM should inline instructions instead of lowering to __sync_ calls.
Reviewers: rengolin, efriedma, t.p.northover, jmolloy
Subscribers: efriedma, aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26120
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@285969 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This recommits r281323, which was backed out for two reasons. One, a selfhost failure, and two, it apparently caused Chromium failures. Actually, the latter was a red herring. The log has expired from the former, but I suspect that was a red herring too (actually caused by another problematic patch of mine). Therefore reapplying, and will watch the bots like a hawk.
For the common pattern (CMPZ (AND x, #bitmask), #0), we can do some more efficient instruction selection if the bitmask is one consecutive sequence of set bits (32 - clz(bm) - ctz(bm) == popcount(bm)).
1) If the bitmask touches the LSB, then we can remove all the upper bits and set the flags by doing one LSLS.
2) If the bitmask touches the MSB, then we can remove all the lower bits and set the flags with one LSRS.
3) If the bitmask has popcount == 1 (only one set bit), we can shift that bit into the sign bit with one LSLS and change the condition query from NE/EQ to MI/PL (we could also implement this by shifting into the carry bit and branching on BCC/BCS).
4) Otherwise, we can emit a sequence of LSLS+LSRS to remove the upper and lower zero bits of the mask.
1-3 require only one 16-bit instruction and can elide the CMP. 4 requires two 16-bit instructions but can elide the CMP and doesn't require materializing a complex immediate, so is also a win.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@285893 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
purpose of the test was to have 2 different function attribute sets, but due
to a typo there was only one both with number #0.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@285701 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
[Reapplying r284580 and r285917 with fix and testing to ensure emitted jump tables for Thumb-1 have 4-byte alignment]
The TBB and TBH instructions in Thumb-2 allow jump tables to be compressed into sequences of bytes or shorts respectively. These instructions do not exist in Thumb-1, however it is possible to synthesize them out of a sequence of other instructions.
It turns out this sequence is so short that it's almost never a lose for performance and is ALWAYS a significant win for code size.
TBB example:
Before: lsls r0, r0, #2 After: add r0, pc
adr r1, .LJTI0_0 ldrb r0, [r0, #6]
ldr r0, [r0, r1] lsls r0, r0, #1
mov pc, r0 add pc, r0
=> No change in prologue code size or dynamic instruction count. Jump table shrunk by a factor of 4.
The only case that can increase dynamic instruction count is the TBH case:
Before: lsls r0, r4, #2 After: lsls r4, r4, #1
adr r1, .LJTI0_0 add r4, pc
ldr r0, [r0, r1] ldrh r4, [r4, #6]
mov pc, r0 lsls r4, r4, #1
add pc, r4
=> 1 more instruction in prologue. Jump table shrunk by a factor of 2.
So there is an argument that this should be disabled when optimizing for performance (and a TBH needs to be generated). I'm not so sure about that in practice, because on small cores with Thumb-1 performance is often tied to code size. But I'm willing to turn it off when optimizing for performance if people want (also note that TBHs are fairly rare in practice!)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@285690 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Generate the slowest possible codepath for noopt CodeGen. Even trying to be
clever with the negated jump can cause out-of-range jumps. Use a wide branch
instead. Although the code is modelled simplistically, the later optimizations
would recombine the branching into `cbz` if possible. This re-enables the
previous optimization as well as hopefully gives us working code in all cases.
Addresses PR30356!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@285649 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The Windows ARM target expects the compiler to emit a division-by-zero check.
The check would use the form of:
cmp r?, #0
cbz .Ltrap
b .Lbody
.Lbody:
...
.Ltrap:
udf #249 @ __brkdiv0
This works great most of the time. However, if the body of the function is
greater than 127 bytes, the branch target limitation of cbz becomes an issue.
This occurs in the unoptimized code generation cases sometimes (like in
compiler-rt).
Since this is a matter of correctness, possibly pay a small penalty instead. We
now form this slightly differently:
cbnz .Lbody
udf #249 @ __brkdiv0
.Lbody:
...
The positive case is through the branch instead of being the next instruction.
However, because of the basic block layout, the negated branch is going to be
a short distance always (2 bytes away, after the inserted __brkdiv0).
The new t__brkdiv0 instruction is required to explicitly mark the instruction as
a terminator as the generic UDF instruction is not a terminator.
Addresses PR30532!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@285312 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
UMAAL is a DSP instruction and it is not available on thumbv7m
(Cortex-M3) and thumbv6m (Cortex-M0+1) targets. Also fix wrong
CHECK prefix in longMAC.ll test.
Patch by Vadzim Dambrouski.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25890
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@285278 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It would be a very nice invariant to rely on, but unfortunately it doesn't
necessarily hold (and the causes of mis-sorted reglists appear to be quite
varied) so to be robust the frame lowering code can't assume that the first
register in the list is also the first one that actually gets pushed.
Should fix an issue where we were turning something like:
push {r8, r4, r7, lr}
sub sp, #24
into nonsense like:
push {r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r4, r7, lr}
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@285232 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
tPCRelJT may not be the first instruction in a block. Check that instead of dereferencing a broken iterator.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@284917 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The original heuristic to break critical edge during machine sink is relatively conservertive: when there is only one instruction sinkable to the critical edge, it is likely that the machine sink pass will not break the critical edge. This leads to many speculative instructions executed at runtime. However, with profile info, we could model the splitting benefits: if the critical edge has 50% taken rate, it would always be beneficial to split the critical edge to avoid the speculated runtime instructions. This patch uses profile to guide critical edge splitting in machine sink pass.
The performance impact on speccpu2006 on Intel sandybridge machines:
spec/2006/fp/C++/444.namd 25.3 +0.26%
spec/2006/fp/C++/447.dealII 45.96 -0.10%
spec/2006/fp/C++/450.soplex 41.97 +1.49%
spec/2006/fp/C++/453.povray 36.83 -0.96%
spec/2006/fp/C/433.milc 23.81 +0.32%
spec/2006/fp/C/470.lbm 41.17 +0.34%
spec/2006/fp/C/482.sphinx3 48.13 +0.69%
spec/2006/int/C++/471.omnetpp 22.45 +3.25%
spec/2006/int/C++/473.astar 21.35 -2.06%
spec/2006/int/C++/483.xalancbmk 36.02 -2.39%
spec/2006/int/C/400.perlbench 33.7 -0.17%
spec/2006/int/C/401.bzip2 22.9 +0.52%
spec/2006/int/C/403.gcc 32.42 -0.54%
spec/2006/int/C/429.mcf 39.59 +0.19%
spec/2006/int/C/445.gobmk 26.98 -0.00%
spec/2006/int/C/456.hmmer 24.52 -0.18%
spec/2006/int/C/458.sjeng 28.26 +0.02%
spec/2006/int/C/462.libquantum 55.44 +3.74%
spec/2006/int/C/464.h264ref 46.67 -0.39%
geometric mean +0.20%
Manually checked 473 and 471 to verify the diff is in the noise range.
Reviewers: rengolin, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24818
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@284757 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This code crashed on funclet-style EH instructions such as catchpad,
catchswitch, and cleanuppad. Just treat all EH pad instructions
equivalently and avoid merging the globals they reference through any
use.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@284633 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The TBB and TBH instructions in Thumb-2 allow jump tables to be compressed into sequences of bytes or shorts respectively. These instructions do not exist in Thumb-1, however it is possible to synthesize them out of a sequence of other instructions.
It turns out this sequence is so short that it's almost never a lose for performance and is ALWAYS a significant win for code size.
TBB example:
Before: lsls r0, r0, #2 After: add r0, pc
adr r1, .LJTI0_0 ldrb r0, [r0, #6]
ldr r0, [r0, r1] lsls r0, r0, #1
mov pc, r0 add pc, r0
=> No change in prologue code size or dynamic instruction count. Jump table shrunk by a factor of 4.
The only case that can increase dynamic instruction count is the TBH case:
Before: lsls r0, r4, #2 After: lsls r4, r4, #1
adr r1, .LJTI0_0 add r4, pc
ldr r0, [r0, r1] ldrh r4, [r4, #6]
mov pc, r0 lsls r4, r4, #1
add pc, r4
=> 1 more instruction in prologue. Jump table shrunk by a factor of 2.
So there is an argument that this should be disabled when optimizing for performance (and a TBH needs to be generated). I'm not so sure about that in practice, because on small cores with Thumb-1 performance is often tied to code size. But I'm willing to turn it off when optimizing for performance if people want (also note that TBHs are fairly rare in practice!)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@284580 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This renames the function for checking FP function attribute values and also
adds more build attribute tests (which are in separate files because build
attributes are set per file).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25625
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@284571 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The original heuristic to break critical edge during machine sink is relatively conservertive: when there is only one instruction sinkable to the critical edge, it is likely that the machine sink pass will not break the critical edge. This leads to many speculative instructions executed at runtime. However, with profile info, we could model the splitting benefits: if the critical edge has 50% taken rate, it would always be beneficial to split the critical edge to avoid the speculated runtime instructions. This patch uses profile to guide critical edge splitting in machine sink pass.
The performance impact on speccpu2006 on Intel sandybridge machines:
spec/2006/fp/C++/444.namd 25.3 +0.26%
spec/2006/fp/C++/447.dealII 45.96 -0.10%
spec/2006/fp/C++/450.soplex 41.97 +1.49%
spec/2006/fp/C++/453.povray 36.83 -0.96%
spec/2006/fp/C/433.milc 23.81 +0.32%
spec/2006/fp/C/470.lbm 41.17 +0.34%
spec/2006/fp/C/482.sphinx3 48.13 +0.69%
spec/2006/int/C++/471.omnetpp 22.45 +3.25%
spec/2006/int/C++/473.astar 21.35 -2.06%
spec/2006/int/C++/483.xalancbmk 36.02 -2.39%
spec/2006/int/C/400.perlbench 33.7 -0.17%
spec/2006/int/C/401.bzip2 22.9 +0.52%
spec/2006/int/C/403.gcc 32.42 -0.54%
spec/2006/int/C/429.mcf 39.59 +0.19%
spec/2006/int/C/445.gobmk 26.98 -0.00%
spec/2006/int/C/456.hmmer 24.52 -0.18%
spec/2006/int/C/458.sjeng 28.26 +0.02%
spec/2006/int/C/462.libquantum 55.44 +3.74%
spec/2006/int/C/464.h264ref 46.67 -0.39%
geometric mean +0.20%
Manually checked 473 and 471 to verify the diff is in the noise range.
Reviewers: rengolin, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24818
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@284545 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The original heuristic to break critical edge during machine sink is relatively conservertive: when there is only one instruction sinkable to the critical edge, it is likely that the machine sink pass will not break the critical edge. This leads to many speculative instructions executed at runtime. However, with profile info, we could model the splitting benefits: if the critical edge has 50% taken rate, it would always be beneficial to split the critical edge to avoid the speculated runtime instructions. This patch uses profile to guide critical edge splitting in machine sink pass.
The performance impact on speccpu2006 on Intel sandybridge machines:
spec/2006/fp/C++/444.namd 25.3 +0.26%
spec/2006/fp/C++/447.dealII 45.96 -0.10%
spec/2006/fp/C++/450.soplex 41.97 +1.49%
spec/2006/fp/C++/453.povray 36.83 -0.96%
spec/2006/fp/C/433.milc 23.81 +0.32%
spec/2006/fp/C/470.lbm 41.17 +0.34%
spec/2006/fp/C/482.sphinx3 48.13 +0.69%
spec/2006/int/C++/471.omnetpp 22.45 +3.25%
spec/2006/int/C++/473.astar 21.35 -2.06%
spec/2006/int/C++/483.xalancbmk 36.02 -2.39%
spec/2006/int/C/400.perlbench 33.7 -0.17%
spec/2006/int/C/401.bzip2 22.9 +0.52%
spec/2006/int/C/403.gcc 32.42 -0.54%
spec/2006/int/C/429.mcf 39.59 +0.19%
spec/2006/int/C/445.gobmk 26.98 -0.00%
spec/2006/int/C/456.hmmer 24.52 -0.18%
spec/2006/int/C/458.sjeng 28.26 +0.02%
spec/2006/int/C/462.libquantum 55.44 +3.74%
spec/2006/int/C/464.h264ref 46.67 -0.39%
geometric mean +0.20%
Manually checked 473 and 471 to verify the diff is in the noise range.
Reviewers: rengolin, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24818
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@284541 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch assigns cost of the scaling used in addressing for Cortex-R52.
On Cortex-R52 a negated register offset takes longer than a non-negated
register offset, in a register-offset addressing mode.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D25670
Reviewer: jmolloy
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@284460 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch adds simplified support for tail calls on ARM with XRay instrumentation.
Known issue: compiled with generic flags: `-O3 -g -fxray-instrument -Wall
-std=c++14 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections` (this list doesn't include my
specific flags like --target=armv7-linux-gnueabihf etc.), the following program
#include <cstdio>
#include <cassert>
#include <xray/xray_interface.h>
[[clang::xray_always_instrument]] void __attribute__ ((noinline)) fC() {
std::printf("In fC()\n");
}
[[clang::xray_always_instrument]] void __attribute__ ((noinline)) fB() {
std::printf("In fB()\n");
fC();
}
[[clang::xray_always_instrument]] void __attribute__ ((noinline)) fA() {
std::printf("In fA()\n");
fB();
}
// Avoid infinite recursion in case the logging function is instrumented (so calls logging
// function again).
[[clang::xray_never_instrument]] void simplyPrint(int32_t functionId, XRayEntryType xret)
{
printf("XRay: functionId=%d type=%d.\n", int(functionId), int(xret));
}
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
__xray_set_handler(simplyPrint);
printf("Patching...\n");
__xray_patch();
fA();
printf("Unpatching...\n");
__xray_unpatch();
fA();
return 0;
}
gives the following output:
Patching...
XRay: functionId=3 type=0.
In fA()
XRay: functionId=3 type=1.
XRay: functionId=2 type=0.
In fB()
XRay: functionId=2 type=1.
XRay: functionId=1 type=0.
XRay: functionId=1 type=1.
In fC()
Unpatching...
In fA()
In fB()
In fC()
So for function fC() the exit sled seems to be called too much before function
exit: before printing In fC().
Debugging shows that the above happens because printf from fC is also called as
a tail call. So first the exit sled of fC is executed, and only then printf is
jumped into. So it seems we can't do anything about this with the current
approach (i.e. within the simplification described in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23988 ).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25030
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@284456 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
SelectionDAG::getConstantPool will automatically determine an appropriate alignment if one is not specified. It does this by querying the type's preferred alignment. This can end up creating quite a lot of padding when the preferred alignment for vectors is 128.
In optimize-for-size mode, it makes sense to instead query the ABI type alignment which is often smaller and causes less padding.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@284381 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Retrying after upstream changes.
Simplify Consecutive Merge Store Candidate Search
Now that address aliasing is much less conservative, push through
simplified store merging search which only checks for parallel stores
through the chain subgraph. This is cleaner as the separation of
non-interfering loads/stores from the store-merging logic.
Whem merging stores, search up the chain through a single load, and
finds all possible stores by looking down from through a load and a
TokenFactor to all stores visited. This improves the quality of the
output SelectionDAG and generally the output CodeGen (with some
exceptions).
Additional Minor Changes:
1. Finishes removing unused AliasLoad code
2. Unifies the the chain aggregation in the merged stores across
code paths
3. Re-add the Store node to the worklist after calling
SimplifyDemandedBits.
4. Increase GatherAllAliasesMaxDepth from 6 to 18. That number is
arbitrary, but seemed sufficient to not cause regressions in
tests.
This finishes the change Matt Arsenault started in r246307 and
jyknight's original patch.
Many tests required some changes as memory operations are now
reorderable. Some tests relying on the order were changed to use
volatile memory operations
Noteworthy tests:
CodeGen/AArch64/argument-blocks.ll -
It's not entirely clear what the test_varargs_stackalign test is
supposed to be asserting, but the new code looks right.
CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-memset-inline.lli -
CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-stur.ll -
CodeGen/ARM/memset-inline.ll -
The backend now generates *worse* code due to store merging
succeeding, as we do do a 16-byte constant-zero store efficiently.
CodeGen/AArch64/merge-store.ll -
Improved, but there still seems to be an extraneous vector insert
from an element to itself?
CodeGen/PowerPC/ppc64-align-long-double.ll -
Worse code emitted in this case, due to the improved store->load
forwarding.
CodeGen/X86/dag-merge-fast-accesses.ll -
CodeGen/X86/MergeConsecutiveStores.ll -
CodeGen/X86/stores-merging.ll -
CodeGen/Mips/load-store-left-right.ll -
Restored correct merging of non-aligned stores
CodeGen/AMDGPU/promote-alloca-stored-pointer-value.ll -
Improved. Correctly merges buffer_store_dword calls
CodeGen/AMDGPU/si-triv-disjoint-mem-access.ll -
Improved. Sidesteps loading a stored value and
merges two stores
CodeGen/X86/pr18023.ll -
This test has been removed, as it was asserting incorrect
behavior. Non-volatile stores *CAN* be moved past volatile loads,
and now are.
CodeGen/X86/vector-idiv.ll -
CodeGen/X86/vector-lzcnt-128.ll -
It's basically impossible to tell what these tests are actually
testing. But, looks like the code got better due to the memory
operations being recognized as non-aliasing.
CodeGen/X86/win32-eh.ll -
Both loads of the securitycookie are now merged.
CodeGen/AMDGPU/vgpr-spill-emergency-stack-slot-compute.ll -
This test appears to work but no longer exhibits the spill behavior.
Reviewers: arsenm, hfinkel, tstellarAMD, jyknight, nhaehnle
Subscribers: wdng, nhaehnle, nemanjai, arsenm, weimingz, niravd, RKSimon, aemerson, qcolombet, dsanders, resistor, tstellarAMD, t.p.northover, spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D14834
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@284151 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch assigns cost of the scaling used in addressing.
On many ARM cores, a negated register offset takes longer than a
non-negated register offset, in a register-offset addressing mode.
For instance:
LDR R0, [R1, R2 LSL #2]
LDR R0, [R1, -R2 LSL #2]
Above, (1) takes less cycles than (2).
By assigning appropriate scaling factor cost, we enable the LLVM
to make the right trade-offs in the optimization and code-selection phase.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D24857
Reviewers: jmolloy, rengolin
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@284127 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- Use storage class C_STAT for 'PrivateLinkage' The storage class for
PrivateLinkage should equal to the Internal Linkage.
- Set 'PrivateGlobalPrefix' from "L" to ".L" for MM_WinCOFF (includes
x86_64) MM_WinCOFF has empty GlobalPrefix '\0' so PrivateGlobalPrefix
"L" may conflict to the normal symbol name starting with 'L'.
Based on a patch by Han Sangjin! Manually updated test cases.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@284096 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This combiner breaks debug experience and should not be run when optimizations are disabled.
For example:
int main() {
int j = 0;
j += 2;
if (j == 2)
return 0;
return 5;
}
When debugging this code compiled in /O0, it should be valid to break at line "j+=2;" and edit the value of j. It should change the return value of the function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D19268
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@284014 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The tail duplication pass uses an assumed layout when making duplication
decisions. This is fine, but passes up duplication opportunities that
may arise when blocks are outlined. Because we want the updated CFG to
affect subsequent placement decisions, this change must occur during
placement.
In order to achieve this goal, TailDuplicationPass is split into a
utility class, TailDuplicator, and the pass itself. The pass delegates
nearly everything to the TailDuplicator object, except for looping over
the blocks in a function. This allows the same code to be used for tail
duplication in both places.
This change, in concert with outlining optional branches, allows
triangle shaped code to perform much better, esepecially when the
taken/untaken branches are correlated, as it creates a second spine when
the tests are small enough.
Issue from previous rollback fixed, and a new test was added for that
case as well. Issue was worklist/scheduling/taildup issue in layout.
Issue from 2nd rollback fixed, with 2 additional tests. Issue was
tail merging/loop info/tail-duplication causing issue with loops that share
a header block.
Issue with early tail-duplication of blocks that branch to a fallthrough
predecessor fixed with test case: tail-dup-branch-to-fallthrough.ll
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18226
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@283934 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently, the Int_eh_sjlj_dispatchsetup intrinsic is marked as
clobbering all registers, including floating-point registers that may
not be present on the target. This is technically true, as we could get
linked against code that does use the FP registers, but that will not
actually work, as the soft-float code cannot save and restore the FP
registers. SjLj exception handling can only work correctly if either all
or none of the code is built for a target with FP registers. Therefore,
we can assume that, when Int_eh_sjlj_dispatchsetup is compiled for a
soft-float target, it is only going to be linked against other
soft-float code, and so only clobbers the general-purpose registers.
This allows us to check that no non-savable registers are clobbered when
generating the prologue/epilogue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25180
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@283866 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
