Files
archived-llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/select.ll
John Criswell cfa435f79b Mark these as failing on sparc instead of sparcv9.
The configure script no longer tells us that we're configuring for SparcV9
specifically.
2004-06-17-UnorderedCompares may work on SparcV8, but it's experiental
anyway.
2005-02-20-AggregateSAVEEXPR should fail on any Solaris machine, as Solaris
doesn't provide complex number support.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_16@24155 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2005-11-02 18:05:50 +00:00

64 lines
1.4 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86
bool %boolSel(bool %A, bool %B, bool %C) {
%X = select bool %A, bool %B, bool %C
ret bool %X
}
sbyte %byteSel(bool %A, sbyte %B, sbyte %C) {
%X = select bool %A, sbyte %B, sbyte %C
ret sbyte %X
}
short %shortSel(bool %A, short %B, short %C) {
%X = select bool %A, short %B, short %C
ret short %X
}
int %intSel(bool %A, int %B, int %C) {
%X = select bool %A, int %B, int %C
ret int %X
}
long %longSel(bool %A, long %B, long %C) {
%X = select bool %A, long %B, long %C
ret long %X
}
double %doubleSel(bool %A, double %B, double %C) {
%X = select bool %A, double %B, double %C
ret double %X
}
sbyte %foldSel(bool %A, sbyte %B, sbyte %C) {
%Cond = setlt sbyte %B, %C
%X = select bool %Cond, sbyte %B, sbyte %C
ret sbyte %X
}
int %foldSel2(bool %A, int %B, int %C) {
%Cond = seteq int %B, %C
%X = select bool %Cond, int %B, int %C
ret int %X
}
int %foldSel2(bool %A, int %B, int %C, double %X, double %Y) {
%Cond = setlt double %X, %Y
%X = select bool %Cond, int %B, int %C
ret int %X
}
float %foldSel3(bool %A, float %B, float %C, uint %X, uint %Y) {
%Cond = setlt uint %X, %Y
%X = select bool %Cond, float %B, float %C
ret float %X
}
float %nofoldSel4(bool %A, float %B, float %C, int %X, int %Y) {
; X86 doesn't have a cmov that reads the right flags for this!
%Cond = setlt int %X, %Y
%X = select bool %Cond, float %B, float %C
ret float %X
}