Files
archived-llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/interchange-flow-dep-outer.ll
Florian Hahn 0d27c3e520 [LoopInterchange] Do not interchange loops with function calls.
Summary:
Without any information about the called function, we cannot be sure
that it is safe to interchange loops which contain function calls. For
example there could be dependences that prevent interchanging between
accesses in the called function and the loops. Even functions without any
parameters could cause problems, as they could access memory using
global pointers.

For now, I think it is only safe to interchange loops with calls marked
as readnone.

With this patch, the LLVM test suite passes with `-O3 -mllvm
-enable-loopinterchange` and LoopInterchangeProfitability::isProfitable
returning true for all loops. check-llvm and check-clang also pass when
bootstrapped in a similar fashion, although only 3 loops got
interchanged.

Reviewers: karthikthecool, blitz.opensource, hfinkel, mcrosier, mkuper

Reviewed By: mcrosier

Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35489

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309547 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-07-31 09:00:52 +00:00

119 lines
4.9 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
;; We test the complete .ll for adjustment in outer loop header/latch and inner loop header/latch.
target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
@A = common global [100 x [100 x i32]] zeroinitializer
@B = common global [100 x i32] zeroinitializer
@C = common global [100 x [100 x i32]] zeroinitializer
@D = common global [100 x [100 x [100 x i32]]] zeroinitializer
;; Test that a flow dependency in outer loop doesn't prevent interchange in
;; loops i and j.
;;
;; for (int k = 0; k < 100; ++k) {
;; T[k] = fn1();
;; for (int i = 0; i < 1000; ++i)
;; for(int j = 1; j < 1000; ++j)
;; Arr[j][i] = Arr[j][i]+k;
;; fn2(T[k]);
;; }
@T = internal global [100 x double] zeroinitializer, align 4
@Arr = internal global [1000 x [1000 x i32]] zeroinitializer, align 4
define void @interchange_09(i32 %k) {
entry:
br label %for.body
for.cond.cleanup: ; preds = %for.cond.cleanup4
ret void
for.body: ; preds = %for.cond.cleanup4, %entry
%indvars.iv45 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next46, %for.cond.cleanup4 ]
%call = call double @fn1()
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [100 x double], [100 x double]* @T, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv45
store double %call, double* %arrayidx, align 8
br label %for.cond6.preheader
for.cond6.preheader: ; preds = %for.cond.cleanup8, %for.body
%indvars.iv42 = phi i64 [ 0, %for.body ], [ %indvars.iv.next43, %for.cond.cleanup8 ]
br label %for.body9
for.cond.cleanup4: ; preds = %for.cond.cleanup8
%tmp = load double, double* %arrayidx, align 8
call void @fn2(double %tmp)
%indvars.iv.next46 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv45, 1
%exitcond47 = icmp ne i64 %indvars.iv.next46, 100
br i1 %exitcond47, label %for.body, label %for.cond.cleanup
for.cond.cleanup8: ; preds = %for.body9
%indvars.iv.next43 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv42, 1
%exitcond44 = icmp ne i64 %indvars.iv.next43, 1000
br i1 %exitcond44, label %for.cond6.preheader, label %for.cond.cleanup4
for.body9: ; preds = %for.body9, %for.cond6.preheader
%indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 1, %for.cond6.preheader ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body9 ]
%arrayidx13 = getelementptr inbounds [1000 x [1000 x i32]], [1000 x [1000 x i32]]* @Arr, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv, i64 %indvars.iv42
%tmp1 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx13, align 4
%tmp2 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv45 to i32
%add = add nsw i32 %tmp1, %tmp2
store i32 %add, i32* %arrayidx13, align 4
%indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
%exitcond = icmp ne i64 %indvars.iv.next, 1000
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.body9, label %for.cond.cleanup8
}
declare double @fn1() readnone
declare void @fn2(double) readnone
;; After interchange %indvars.iv (j) should increment as the middle loop.
;; After interchange %indvars.iv42 (i) should increment with the inner most loop.
; CHECK-LABEL: @interchange_09
; CHECK: for.body:
; CHECK: %indvars.iv45 = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next46, %for.cond.cleanup4 ], [ 0, %for.body.preheader ]
; CHECK: %call = call double @fn1()
; CHECK: %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [100 x double], [100 x double]* @T, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv45
; CHECK: store double %call, double* %arrayidx, align 8
; CHECK: br label %for.body9.preheader
; CHECK: for.cond6.preheader.preheader:
; CHECK: br label %for.cond6.preheader
; CHECK: for.cond6.preheader:
; CHECK: %indvars.iv42 = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next43, %for.cond.cleanup8 ], [ 0, %for.cond6.preheader.preheader ]
; CHECK: br label %for.body9.split1
; CHECK: for.body9.preheader:
; CHECK: br label %for.body9
; CHECK: for.cond.cleanup4:
; CHECK: %tmp = load double, double* %arrayidx, align 8
; CHECK: call void @fn2(double %tmp)
; CHECK: %indvars.iv.next46 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv45, 1
; CHECK: %exitcond47 = icmp ne i64 %indvars.iv.next46, 100
; CHECK: br i1 %exitcond47, label %for.body, label %for.cond.cleanup
; CHECK: for.cond.cleanup8:
; CHECK: %indvars.iv.next43 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv42, 1
; CHECK: %exitcond44 = icmp ne i64 %indvars.iv.next43, 1000
; CHECK: br i1 %exitcond44, label %for.cond6.preheader, label %for.body9.split
; CHECK: for.body9:
; CHECK: %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body9.split ], [ 1, %for.body9.preheader ]
; CHECK: br label %for.cond6.preheader.preheader
; CHECK: for.body9.split1:
; CHECK: %arrayidx13 = getelementptr inbounds [1000 x [1000 x i32]], [1000 x [1000 x i32]]* @Arr, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv, i64 %indvars.iv42
; CHECK: store i32 %add, i32* %arrayidx13, align 4
; CHECK: br label %for.cond.cleanup8
; CHECK: for.body9.split:
; CHECK: %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
; CHECK: %exitcond = icmp ne i64 %indvars.iv.next, 1000
; CHECK: br i1 %exitcond, label %for.body9, label %for.cond.cleanup4