Files
archived-llvm/test/Transforms/LoadStoreVectorizer/X86
Roman Tereshin 78dd298f34 [SCEV] Add zext(C + x + ...) -> D + zext(C-D + x + ...)<nuw><nsw> transform
if the top level addition in (D + (C-D + x + ...)) could be proven to
not wrap, where the choice of D also maximizes the number of trailing
zeroes of (C-D + x + ...), ensuring homogeneous behaviour of the
transformation and better canonicalization of such expressions.

This enables better canonicalization of expressions like

  1 + zext(5 + 20 * %x + 24 * %y)  and
      zext(6 + 20 * %x + 24 * %y)

which get both transformed to

  2 + zext(4 + 20 * %x + 24 * %y)

This pattern is common in address arithmetics and the transformation
makes it easier for passes like LoadStoreVectorizer to prove that 2 or
more memory accesses are consecutive and optimize (vectorize) them.

Reviewed By: mzolotukhin

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48853

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@337859 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2018-07-24 21:48:56 +00:00
..
2017-04-05 20:51:38 +00:00