RPCS3/llvm-mirror
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-12-14 07:09:08 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
2dde032c9a
llvm-mirror/test/Bitcode/DIExpression-deref.ll

28 lines
1.3 KiB
LLVM
Raw Normal View History

PR32382: Fix emitting complex DWARF expressions. The DWARF specification knows 3 kinds of non-empty simple location descriptions: 1. Register location descriptions - describe a variable in a register - consist of only a DW_OP_reg 2. Memory location descriptions - describe the address of a variable 3. Implicit location descriptions - describe the value of a variable - end with DW_OP_stack_value & friends The existing DwarfExpression code is pretty much ignorant of these restrictions. This used to not matter because we only emitted very short expressions that we happened to get right by accident. This patch makes DwarfExpression aware of the rules defined by the DWARF standard and now chooses the right kind of location description for each expression being emitted. This would have been an NFC commit (for the existing testsuite) if not for the way that clang describes captured block variables. Based on how the previous code in LLVM emitted locations, DW_OP_deref operations that should have come at the end of the expression are put at its beginning. Fixing this means changing the semantics of DIExpression, so this patch bumps the version number of DIExpression and implements a bitcode upgrade. There are two major changes in this patch: I had to fix the semantics of dbg.declare for describing function arguments. After this patch a dbg.declare always takes the *address* of a variable as the first argument, even if the argument is not an alloca. When lowering a DBG_VALUE, the decision of whether to emit a register location description or a memory location description depends on the MachineLocation — register machine locations may get promoted to memory locations based on their DIExpression. (Future) optimization passes that want to salvage implicit debug location for variables may do so by appending a DW_OP_stack_value. For example: DBG_VALUE, [RBP-8] --> DW_OP_fbreg -8 DBG_VALUE, RAX --> DW_OP_reg0 +0 DBG_VALUE, RAX, DIExpression(DW_OP_deref) --> DW_OP_reg0 +0 All testcases that were modified were regenerated from clang. I also added source-based testcases for each of these to the debuginfo-tests repository over the last week to make sure that no synchronized bugs slip in. The debuginfo-tests compile from source and run the debugger. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32382 <rdar://problem/31205000> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31439 llvm-svn: 300522
2017-04-18 01:21:53 +00:00
; RUN: llvm-dis -o - %s.bc | FileCheck %s
!llvm.dbg.cu = !{!1}
!llvm.module.flags = !{!20, !21}
!0 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(name: "g", scope: !1, file: !2, line: 1, type: !5, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true)
Fix a bug in a historic bitcode testcase. llvm-svn: 313940
2017-09-21 23:14:55 +00:00
!1 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !2, producer: "clang (llvm/trunk 300520)", isOptimized: false, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug, enums: !3, globals: !4)
PR32382: Fix emitting complex DWARF expressions. The DWARF specification knows 3 kinds of non-empty simple location descriptions: 1. Register location descriptions - describe a variable in a register - consist of only a DW_OP_reg 2. Memory location descriptions - describe the address of a variable 3. Implicit location descriptions - describe the value of a variable - end with DW_OP_stack_value & friends The existing DwarfExpression code is pretty much ignorant of these restrictions. This used to not matter because we only emitted very short expressions that we happened to get right by accident. This patch makes DwarfExpression aware of the rules defined by the DWARF standard and now chooses the right kind of location description for each expression being emitted. This would have been an NFC commit (for the existing testsuite) if not for the way that clang describes captured block variables. Based on how the previous code in LLVM emitted locations, DW_OP_deref operations that should have come at the end of the expression are put at its beginning. Fixing this means changing the semantics of DIExpression, so this patch bumps the version number of DIExpression and implements a bitcode upgrade. There are two major changes in this patch: I had to fix the semantics of dbg.declare for describing function arguments. After this patch a dbg.declare always takes the *address* of a variable as the first argument, even if the argument is not an alloca. When lowering a DBG_VALUE, the decision of whether to emit a register location description or a memory location description depends on the MachineLocation — register machine locations may get promoted to memory locations based on their DIExpression. (Future) optimization passes that want to salvage implicit debug location for variables may do so by appending a DW_OP_stack_value. For example: DBG_VALUE, [RBP-8] --> DW_OP_fbreg -8 DBG_VALUE, RAX --> DW_OP_reg0 +0 DBG_VALUE, RAX, DIExpression(DW_OP_deref) --> DW_OP_reg0 +0 All testcases that were modified were regenerated from clang. I also added source-based testcases for each of these to the debuginfo-tests repository over the last week to make sure that no synchronized bugs slip in. The debuginfo-tests compile from source and run the debugger. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32382 <rdar://problem/31205000> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31439 llvm-svn: 300522
2017-04-18 01:21:53 +00:00
!2 = !DIFile(filename: "a.c", directory: "/")
!3 = !{}
!4 = !{!10, !11, !12, !13}
!5 = !DIBasicType(name: "int", size: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_signed)
; DW_OP_deref should be moved to the back of the expression.
;
Fix a bug in a historic bitcode testcase. llvm-svn: 313940
2017-09-21 23:14:55 +00:00
; CHECK: !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 0, DW_OP_deref, DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 8, 8)
!6 = !DIExpression(DW_OP_deref, DW_OP_plus, 0, DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 8, 8)
Align definition of DW_OP_plus with DWARF spec [3/3] Summary: This patch is part of 3 patches that together form a single patch, but must be introduced in stages in order not to break things. The way that LLVM interprets DW_OP_plus in DIExpression nodes is basically that of the DW_OP_plus_uconst operator since LLVM expects an unsigned constant operand. This unnecessarily restricts the DW_OP_plus operator, preventing it from being used to describe the evaluation of runtime values on the expression stack. These patches try to align the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus with that of the DWARF definition, which pops two elements off the expression stack, performs the operation and pushes the result back on the stack. This is done in three stages: • The first patch (LLVM) adds support for DW_OP_plus_uconst. • The second patch (Clang) contains changes all its uses from DW_OP_plus to DW_OP_plus_uconst. • The third patch (LLVM) changes the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus to be in line with its DWARF meaning. This patch includes the bitcode upgrade from legacy DIExpressions. Patch by Sander de Smalen. Reviewers: echristo, pcc, aprantl Reviewed By: aprantl Subscribers: fhahn, javed.absar, aprantl, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33894 llvm-svn: 305386
2017-06-14 13:14:38 +00:00
; CHECK: !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 0, DW_OP_deref)
PR32382: Fix emitting complex DWARF expressions. The DWARF specification knows 3 kinds of non-empty simple location descriptions: 1. Register location descriptions - describe a variable in a register - consist of only a DW_OP_reg 2. Memory location descriptions - describe the address of a variable 3. Implicit location descriptions - describe the value of a variable - end with DW_OP_stack_value & friends The existing DwarfExpression code is pretty much ignorant of these restrictions. This used to not matter because we only emitted very short expressions that we happened to get right by accident. This patch makes DwarfExpression aware of the rules defined by the DWARF standard and now chooses the right kind of location description for each expression being emitted. This would have been an NFC commit (for the existing testsuite) if not for the way that clang describes captured block variables. Based on how the previous code in LLVM emitted locations, DW_OP_deref operations that should have come at the end of the expression are put at its beginning. Fixing this means changing the semantics of DIExpression, so this patch bumps the version number of DIExpression and implements a bitcode upgrade. There are two major changes in this patch: I had to fix the semantics of dbg.declare for describing function arguments. After this patch a dbg.declare always takes the *address* of a variable as the first argument, even if the argument is not an alloca. When lowering a DBG_VALUE, the decision of whether to emit a register location description or a memory location description depends on the MachineLocation — register machine locations may get promoted to memory locations based on their DIExpression. (Future) optimization passes that want to salvage implicit debug location for variables may do so by appending a DW_OP_stack_value. For example: DBG_VALUE, [RBP-8] --> DW_OP_fbreg -8 DBG_VALUE, RAX --> DW_OP_reg0 +0 DBG_VALUE, RAX, DIExpression(DW_OP_deref) --> DW_OP_reg0 +0 All testcases that were modified were regenerated from clang. I also added source-based testcases for each of these to the debuginfo-tests repository over the last week to make sure that no synchronized bugs slip in. The debuginfo-tests compile from source and run the debugger. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32382 <rdar://problem/31205000> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31439 llvm-svn: 300522
2017-04-18 01:21:53 +00:00
!7 = !DIExpression(DW_OP_deref, DW_OP_plus, 0)
Align definition of DW_OP_plus with DWARF spec [3/3] Summary: This patch is part of 3 patches that together form a single patch, but must be introduced in stages in order not to break things. The way that LLVM interprets DW_OP_plus in DIExpression nodes is basically that of the DW_OP_plus_uconst operator since LLVM expects an unsigned constant operand. This unnecessarily restricts the DW_OP_plus operator, preventing it from being used to describe the evaluation of runtime values on the expression stack. These patches try to align the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus with that of the DWARF definition, which pops two elements off the expression stack, performs the operation and pushes the result back on the stack. This is done in three stages: • The first patch (LLVM) adds support for DW_OP_plus_uconst. • The second patch (Clang) contains changes all its uses from DW_OP_plus to DW_OP_plus_uconst. • The third patch (LLVM) changes the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus to be in line with its DWARF meaning. This patch includes the bitcode upgrade from legacy DIExpressions. Patch by Sander de Smalen. Reviewers: echristo, pcc, aprantl Reviewed By: aprantl Subscribers: fhahn, javed.absar, aprantl, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33894 llvm-svn: 305386
2017-06-14 13:14:38 +00:00
; CHECK: !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 1, DW_OP_deref)
PR32382: Fix emitting complex DWARF expressions. The DWARF specification knows 3 kinds of non-empty simple location descriptions: 1. Register location descriptions - describe a variable in a register - consist of only a DW_OP_reg 2. Memory location descriptions - describe the address of a variable 3. Implicit location descriptions - describe the value of a variable - end with DW_OP_stack_value & friends The existing DwarfExpression code is pretty much ignorant of these restrictions. This used to not matter because we only emitted very short expressions that we happened to get right by accident. This patch makes DwarfExpression aware of the rules defined by the DWARF standard and now chooses the right kind of location description for each expression being emitted. This would have been an NFC commit (for the existing testsuite) if not for the way that clang describes captured block variables. Based on how the previous code in LLVM emitted locations, DW_OP_deref operations that should have come at the end of the expression are put at its beginning. Fixing this means changing the semantics of DIExpression, so this patch bumps the version number of DIExpression and implements a bitcode upgrade. There are two major changes in this patch: I had to fix the semantics of dbg.declare for describing function arguments. After this patch a dbg.declare always takes the *address* of a variable as the first argument, even if the argument is not an alloca. When lowering a DBG_VALUE, the decision of whether to emit a register location description or a memory location description depends on the MachineLocation — register machine locations may get promoted to memory locations based on their DIExpression. (Future) optimization passes that want to salvage implicit debug location for variables may do so by appending a DW_OP_stack_value. For example: DBG_VALUE, [RBP-8] --> DW_OP_fbreg -8 DBG_VALUE, RAX --> DW_OP_reg0 +0 DBG_VALUE, RAX, DIExpression(DW_OP_deref) --> DW_OP_reg0 +0 All testcases that were modified were regenerated from clang. I also added source-based testcases for each of these to the debuginfo-tests repository over the last week to make sure that no synchronized bugs slip in. The debuginfo-tests compile from source and run the debugger. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32382 <rdar://problem/31205000> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31439 llvm-svn: 300522
2017-04-18 01:21:53 +00:00
!8 = !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus, 1, DW_OP_deref)
; CHECK: !DIExpression(DW_OP_deref)
!9 = !DIExpression(DW_OP_deref)
!10 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !0, expr: !6)
!11 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !0, expr: !7)
!12 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !0, expr: !8)
!13 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !0, expr: !9)
!20 = !{i32 2, !"Dwarf Version", i32 4}
!21 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink