mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-30 06:40:53 +00:00
Teach GVN to also propagate switch cases. For example, in this code
switch (n) { case 27: do_something(x); ... } the call do_something(x) will be replaced with do_something(27). In gcc-as-one-big-file this results in the removal of about 500 lines of bitcode (about 0.02%), so has about 1/10 of the effect of propagating branch conditions. llvm-svn: 141360
This commit is contained in:
parent
761bf0e7d3
commit
559ef2f491
@ -1980,6 +1980,42 @@ bool GVN::propagateEquality(Value *LHS, Value *RHS, BasicBlock *Root) {
|
||||
return Changed;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// isOnlyReachableViaThisEdge - There is an edge from 'Src' to 'Dst'. Return
|
||||
/// true if every path from the entry block to 'Dst' passes via this edge. In
|
||||
/// particular 'Dst' must not be reachable via another edge from 'Src'.
|
||||
static bool isOnlyReachableViaThisEdge(BasicBlock *Src, BasicBlock *Dst,
|
||||
DominatorTree *DT) {
|
||||
// First off, there must not be more than one edge from Src to Dst, there
|
||||
// should be exactly one. So keep track of the number of times Src occurs
|
||||
// as a predecessor of Dst and fail if it's more than once. Secondly, any
|
||||
// other predecessors of Dst should be dominated by Dst (see logic below).
|
||||
bool SawEdgeFromSrc = false;
|
||||
for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(Dst), PE = pred_end(Dst); PI != PE; ++PI) {
|
||||
BasicBlock *Pred = *PI;
|
||||
if (Pred == Src) {
|
||||
// An edge from Src to Dst.
|
||||
if (SawEdgeFromSrc)
|
||||
// There are multiple edges from Src to Dst - fail.
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
SawEdgeFromSrc = true;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// If the predecessor is not dominated by Dst, then it must be possible to
|
||||
// reach it either without passing through Src (and thus not via the edge)
|
||||
// or by passing through Src but taking a different edge out of Src. Either
|
||||
// way it is possible to reach Dst without passing via the edge, so fail.
|
||||
if (!DT->dominates(Dst, *PI))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert(SawEdgeFromSrc && "No edge between these basic blocks!");
|
||||
|
||||
// Every path from the entry block to Dst must at some point pass to Dst from
|
||||
// a predecessor that is not dominated by Dst. This predecessor can only be
|
||||
// Src, since all others are dominated by Dst. As there is only one edge from
|
||||
// Src to Dst, the path passes by this edge.
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// processInstruction - When calculating availability, handle an instruction
|
||||
/// by inserting it into the appropriate sets
|
||||
bool GVN::processInstruction(Instruction *I) {
|
||||
@ -2011,7 +2047,6 @@ bool GVN::processInstruction(Instruction *I) {
|
||||
|
||||
// For conditional branches, we can perform simple conditional propagation on
|
||||
// the condition value itself.
|
||||
// TODO: Add conditional propagation of switch cases.
|
||||
if (BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(I)) {
|
||||
if (!BI->isConditional() || isa<Constant>(BI->getCondition()))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
@ -2021,41 +2056,34 @@ bool GVN::processInstruction(Instruction *I) {
|
||||
BasicBlock *TrueSucc = BI->getSuccessor(0);
|
||||
BasicBlock *FalseSucc = BI->getSuccessor(1);
|
||||
BasicBlock *Parent = BI->getParent();
|
||||
bool Changed = false;
|
||||
|
||||
// If the true and false branches are to the same basic block then the
|
||||
// branch gives no information about the condition. Eliminating this
|
||||
// here simplifies the rest of the logic.
|
||||
if (TrueSucc == FalseSucc)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// If the true block can be reached without executing the true edge then we
|
||||
// can't say anything about the value of the condition there.
|
||||
for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(TrueSucc), PE = pred_end(TrueSucc);
|
||||
PI != PE; ++PI)
|
||||
if (*PI != Parent && !DT->dominates(TrueSucc, *PI)) {
|
||||
TrueSucc = 0;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If the false block can be reached without executing the false edge then
|
||||
// we can't say anything about the value of the condition there.
|
||||
for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(FalseSucc), PE = pred_end(FalseSucc);
|
||||
PI != PE; ++PI)
|
||||
if (*PI != Parent && !DT->dominates(FalseSucc, *PI)) {
|
||||
FalseSucc = 0;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Replace the condition with true/false in basic blocks that can only be
|
||||
// reached via the true/false arm of the branch.
|
||||
return (TrueSucc && propagateEquality(BranchCond,
|
||||
if (isOnlyReachableViaThisEdge(Parent, TrueSucc, DT))
|
||||
Changed |= propagateEquality(BranchCond,
|
||||
ConstantInt::getTrue(TrueSucc->getContext()),
|
||||
TrueSucc))
|
||||
|| (FalseSucc && propagateEquality(BranchCond,
|
||||
ConstantInt::getFalse(FalseSucc->getContext()),
|
||||
FalseSucc));
|
||||
TrueSucc);
|
||||
|
||||
if (isOnlyReachableViaThisEdge(Parent, FalseSucc, DT))
|
||||
Changed |= propagateEquality(BranchCond,
|
||||
ConstantInt::getFalse(FalseSucc->getContext()),
|
||||
FalseSucc);
|
||||
|
||||
return Changed;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// For switches, propagate the case values into the case destinations.
|
||||
if (SwitchInst *SI = dyn_cast<SwitchInst>(I)) {
|
||||
Value *SwitchCond = SI->getCondition();
|
||||
BasicBlock *Parent = SI->getParent();
|
||||
bool Changed = false;
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 1, e = SI->getNumCases(); i != e; ++i) {
|
||||
BasicBlock *Dst = SI->getSuccessor(i);
|
||||
if (isOnlyReachableViaThisEdge(Parent, Dst, DT))
|
||||
Changed |= propagateEquality(SwitchCond, SI->getCaseValue(i), Dst);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return Changed;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Instructions with void type don't return a value, so there's
|
||||
// no point in trying to find redudancies in them.
|
||||
if (I->getType()->isVoidTy()) return false;
|
||||
|
@ -97,3 +97,36 @@ nope:
|
||||
; CHECK: call void @foo(i1 false)
|
||||
ret void
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
; CHECK: @test4
|
||||
define void @test4(i1 %b, i32 %x) {
|
||||
br i1 %b, label %sw, label %case3
|
||||
sw:
|
||||
switch i32 %x, label %default [
|
||||
i32 0, label %case0
|
||||
i32 1, label %case1
|
||||
i32 2, label %case0
|
||||
i32 3, label %case3
|
||||
i32 4, label %default
|
||||
]
|
||||
default:
|
||||
; CHECK: default:
|
||||
call void @bar(i32 %x)
|
||||
; CHECK: call void @bar(i32 %x)
|
||||
ret void
|
||||
case0:
|
||||
; CHECK: case0:
|
||||
call void @bar(i32 %x)
|
||||
; CHECK: call void @bar(i32 %x)
|
||||
ret void
|
||||
case1:
|
||||
; CHECK: case1:
|
||||
call void @bar(i32 %x)
|
||||
; CHECK: call void @bar(i32 1)
|
||||
ret void
|
||||
case3:
|
||||
; CHECK: case3:
|
||||
call void @bar(i32 %x)
|
||||
; CHECK: call void @bar(i32 %x)
|
||||
ret void
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user