[Docs] Update HowToSubmitABug

With the new PM imminent, bugpoint will diverge from opt, meaning it may
not reproduce a crash with the same arguments passed to opt. We need to
specify alternatives to bugpoint for reducing crashes.

I looked at the rest of the document to see if anything could be
improved. Major highlights:

* Run -Xclang -disable-llvm-passes instead of -O0 for skipping IR passes
* Mention the files that clang dumps on a crash
* Remove outdated reference to `delta` and plug `creduce` instead
* Mention llvm-reduce on top of bugpoint
* Mention --print-before-all --print-module-scope
* Mention sanitizers in addition to valgrind
* Mention opt-bisect for miscompiles

Reviewed By: fhahn, MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95578
This commit is contained in:
Arthur Eubanks 2021-01-27 16:15:44 -08:00
parent 8e11f021aa
commit 67b774212d

View File

@ -12,13 +12,12 @@ getting it fixed quickly.
🔒 If you believe that the bug is security related, please follow :ref:`report-security-issue`. 🔒
Basically you have to do two things at a minimum. First, decide whether
the bug `crashes the compiler`_ (or an LLVM pass), or if the
compiler is `miscompiling`_ the program (i.e., the
compiler successfully produces an executable, but it doesn't run right).
Based on what type of bug it is, follow the instructions in the linked
section to narrow down the bug so that the person who fixes it will be able
to find the problem more easily.
Basically you have to do two things at a minimum. First, decide whether the
bug `crashes the compiler`_ or if the compiler is `miscompiling`_ the program
(i.e., the compiler successfully produces an executable, but it doesn't run
right). Based on what type of bug it is, follow the instructions in the
linked section to narrow down the bug so that the person who fixes it will be
able to find the problem more easily.
Once you have a reduced test-case, go to `the LLVM Bug Tracking System
<https://bugs.llvm.org/enter_bug.cgi>`_ and fill out the form with the
@ -44,74 +43,94 @@ is to figure out if it is crashing in the Clang front-end or if it is one of
the LLVM libraries (e.g. the optimizer or code generator) that has
problems.
To figure out which component is crashing (the front-end, optimizer or code
generator), run the ``clang`` command line as you were when the crash
occurred, but with the following extra command line options:
To figure out which component is crashing (the front-end, middle-end
optimizer, or backend code generator), run the ``clang`` command line as you
were when the crash occurred, but with the following extra command line
options:
* ``-O0 -emit-llvm``: If ``clang`` still crashes when passed these
options (which disable the optimizer and code generator), then the crash
is in the front-end. Jump ahead to the section on :ref:`front-end bugs
<front-end>`.
* ``-emit-llvm -Xclang -disable-llvm-passes``: If ``clang`` still crashes when
passed these options (which disable the optimizer and code generator), then
the crash is in the front-end. Jump ahead to :ref:`front-end bugs
<frontend-crash>`.
* ``-emit-llvm``: If ``clang`` crashes with this option (which disables
the code generator), you found an optimizer bug. Jump ahead to
`compile-time optimization bugs`_.
the code generator), you found a middle-end optimizer bug. Jump ahead to
:ref:`middle-end bugs <middleend-crash>`.
* Otherwise, you have a code generator crash. Jump ahead to `code
generator bugs`_.
* Otherwise, you have a backend code generator crash. Jump ahead to :ref:`code
generator bugs <backend-crash>`.
.. _front-end bug:
.. _front-end:
.. _frontend-crash:
Front-end bugs
--------------
If the problem is in the front-end, you should re-run the same ``clang``
command that resulted in the crash, but add the ``-save-temps`` option.
The compiler will crash again, but it will leave behind a ``foo.i`` file
(containing preprocessed C source code) and possibly ``foo.s`` for each
compiled ``foo.c`` file. Send us the ``foo.i`` file, along with the options
you passed to ``clang``, and a brief description of the error it caused.
On a ``clang`` crash, the compiler will dump a preprocessed file and a script
to replay the ``clang`` command. For example, you should see something like
The `delta <http://delta.tigris.org/>`_ tool helps to reduce the
preprocessed file down to the smallest amount of code that still replicates
the problem. You're encouraged to use delta to reduce the code to make the
developers' lives easier. `This website
<http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction>`_ has instructions
on the best way to use delta.
.. code-block:: text
.. _compile-time optimization bugs:
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING FILES TO THE BUG REPORT:
Preprocessed source(s) and associated run script(s) are located at:
clang: note: diagnostic msg: /tmp/foo-xxxxxx.c
clang: note: diagnostic msg: /tmp/foo-xxxxxx.sh
Compile-time optimization bugs
------------------------------
The `creduce <https://github.com/csmith-project/creduce>`_ tool helps to
reduce the preprocessed file down to the smallest amount of code that still
replicates the problem. You're encouraged to use creduce to reduce the code
to make the developers' lives easier. The
``clang/utils/creduce-clang-crash.py`` script can be used on the files
that clang dumps to help with automating creating a test to check for the
compiler crash.
`cvise <https://github.com/marxin/cvise>`_ is an alternative to ``creduce``.
.. _middleend-crash:
Middle-end optimization bugs
----------------------------
If you find that a bug crashes in the optimizer, compile your test-case to a
``.bc`` file by passing "``-emit-llvm -O1 -Xclang -disable-llvm-passes -c -o
foo.bc``". Then run:
foo.bc``". The ``-O1`` is important because ``-O0`` adds the ``optnone``
function attribute to all functions and many passes don't run on ``optnone``
functions. Then run:
.. code-block:: bash
opt -O3 -debug-pass=Arguments foo.bc -disable-output
opt -O3 foo.bc -disable-output
This command should do two things: it should print out a list of passes, and
then it should crash in the same way as clang. If it doesn't crash, please
follow the instructions for a `front-end bug`_.
If this doesn't crash, please follow the instructions for a :ref:`front-end
bug <frontend-crash>`.
If this does crash, then you should be able to debug this with the following
bugpoint command:
:doc:`bugpoint <Bugpoint>` command:
.. code-block:: bash
bugpoint foo.bc <list of passes printed by opt>
bugpoint foo.bc -O3
Please run this, then file a bug with the instructions and reduced .bc
files that bugpoint emits. If something goes wrong with bugpoint, please
submit the "foo.bc" file and the list of passes printed by ``opt``.
Run this, then file a bug with the instructions and reduced .bc
files that bugpoint emits.
.. _code generator bugs:
If bugpoint doesn't reproduce the crash, ``llvm-reduce`` is an alternative
way to reduce LLVM IR. Create a script that repros the crash and run:
Code generator bugs
-------------------
.. code-block:: bash
llvm-reduce --test=path/to/script foo.bc
which should produce reduced IR that reproduces the crash. Be warned the
``llvm-reduce`` is still fairly immature and may crash.
If none of the above work, you can get the IR before a crash by running the
``opt`` command with the ``--print-before-all --print-module-scope`` flags to
dump the IR before every pass. Be warned that this is very verbose.
.. _backend-crash:
Backend code generator bugs
---------------------------
If you find a bug that crashes clang in the code generator, compile your
source file to a .bc file by passing "``-emit-llvm -c -o foo.bc``" to
@ -122,10 +141,10 @@ foo.bc, one of the following commands should fail:
#. ``llc foo.bc -relocation-model=pic``
#. ``llc foo.bc -relocation-model=static``
If none of these crash, please follow the instructions for a `front-end
bug`_. If one of these do crash, you should be able to reduce this with
one of the following bugpoint command lines (use the one corresponding to
the command above that failed):
If none of these crash, please follow the instructions for a :ref:`front-end
bug<frontend-crash>`. If one of these do crash, you should be able to reduce
this with one of the following :doc:`bugpoint <Bugpoint>` command lines (use
the one corresponding to the command above that failed):
#. ``bugpoint -run-llc foo.bc``
#. ``bugpoint -run-llc foo.bc --tool-args -relocation-model=pic``
@ -140,14 +159,15 @@ the "foo.bc" file and the option that llc crashes with.
Miscompilations
===============
If clang successfully produces an executable, but that executable
doesn't run right, this is either a bug in the code or a bug in the
compiler. The first thing to check is to make sure it is not using
undefined behavior (e.g. reading a variable before it is defined). In
particular, check to see if the program `valgrind
<http://valgrind.org/>`_'s clean, passes purify, or some other memory
checker tool. Many of the "LLVM bugs" that we have chased down ended up
being bugs in the program being compiled, not LLVM.
If clang successfully produces an executable, but that executable doesn't run
right, this is either a bug in the code or a bug in the compiler. The first
thing to check is to make sure it is not using undefined behavior (e.g.
reading a variable before it is defined). In particular, check to see if the
program is clean under various `sanitizers
<https://github.com/google/sanitizers>`_ (e.g. ``clang
-fsanitize=undefined,address``) and `valgrind <http://valgrind.org/>`_. Many
"LLVM bugs" that we have chased down ended up being bugs in the program being
compiled, not LLVM.
Once you determine that the program itself is not buggy, you should choose
which code generator you wish to compile the program with (e.g. LLC or the JIT)
@ -162,6 +182,9 @@ causes an error, and simplify the bitcode file as much as it can to assist
you. It will print a message letting you know how to reproduce the
resulting error.
The :doc:`OptBisect <OptBisect>` page shows an alternative method for finding
incorrect optimization passes.
Incorrect code generation
=========================