mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-12-14 07:09:08 +00:00
[InstCombine] replace undef in vector constant for safe shift transform (PR45447)
As noted in PR45447, we have a vector-constant-with-undef-element transform bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45447 We replace undefs with a safe constant (0 or -1) based on the (non-)negative predicate constraint. So this is correct: http://volta.cs.utah.edu:8080/z/WZE36H ...but this is not: http://volta.cs.utah.edu:8080/z/boj8gJ Previously, we were relying on getSafeVectorConstantForBinop() in the related fold (D76800). But that's making an assumption about what qualifies as "safe", and that assumption may not always hold. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77739
This commit is contained in:
parent
941b9f5d86
commit
de39bfc89c
@ -3071,16 +3071,22 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitXor(BinaryOperator &I) {
|
||||
Constant *C;
|
||||
if (match(NotVal, m_AShr(m_Constant(C), m_Value(Y))) &&
|
||||
match(C, m_Negative())) {
|
||||
Constant *NewC = ConstantExpr::getNot(C);
|
||||
if (C->getType()->isVectorTy())
|
||||
NewC = getSafeVectorConstantForBinop(Instruction::LShr, NewC, false);
|
||||
return BinaryOperator::CreateLShr(NewC, Y);
|
||||
// We matched a negative constant, so propagating undef is unsafe.
|
||||
// Clamp undef elements to -1.
|
||||
Type *EltTy = C->getType()->getScalarType();
|
||||
C = Constant::replaceUndefsWith(C, ConstantInt::getAllOnesValue(EltTy));
|
||||
return BinaryOperator::CreateLShr(ConstantExpr::getNot(C), Y);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ~(C >>u Y) --> ~C >>s Y (when inverting the replicated sign bits)
|
||||
if (match(NotVal, m_LShr(m_Constant(C), m_Value(Y))) &&
|
||||
match(C, m_NonNegative()))
|
||||
match(C, m_NonNegative())) {
|
||||
// We matched a non-negative constant, so propagating undef is unsafe.
|
||||
// Clamp undef elements to 0.
|
||||
Type *EltTy = C->getType()->getScalarType();
|
||||
C = Constant::replaceUndefsWith(C, ConstantInt::getNullValue(EltTy));
|
||||
return BinaryOperator::CreateAShr(ConstantExpr::getNot(C), Y);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ~(X + C) --> -(C + 1) - X
|
||||
if (match(Op0, m_Add(m_Value(X), m_Constant(C))))
|
||||
|
@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ define <4 x i32> @test_v4i32_not_lshr_nonnegative_const(<4 x i32> %a0) {
|
||||
|
||||
define <4 x i32> @test_v4i32_not_lshr_nonnegative_const_undef(<4 x i32> %a0) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_v4i32_not_lshr_nonnegative_const_undef(
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = ashr <4 x i32> <i32 -4, i32 -6, i32 undef, i32 -10>, [[A0:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = ashr <4 x i32> <i32 -4, i32 -6, i32 -1, i32 -10>, [[A0:%.*]]
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret <4 x i32> [[TMP1]]
|
||||
;
|
||||
%1 = lshr <4 x i32> <i32 3, i32 5, i32 undef, i32 9>, %a0
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user