From ee4ec69fbcbe418b0ae143370f02ca65e833a4a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sanjay Patel Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:20:09 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [InstCombine] add nsw/nuw X, signbit --> or X, signbit Changing to 'or' (rather than 'xor' when no wrapping flags are set) allows icmp simplifies to happen as expected. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29729 llvm-svn: 295574 --- lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp | 11 +++++++++-- test/Transforms/InstCombine/add.ll | 10 ++++------ test/Transforms/InstCombine/icmp-add.ll | 10 ++++------ 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp b/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp index 998ef492fc1..95f266a3d5f 100644 --- a/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp +++ b/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp @@ -1044,9 +1044,16 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitAdd(BinaryOperator &I) { const APInt *Val; if (match(RHS, m_APInt(Val))) { - // X + (signbit) --> X ^ signbit - if (Val->isSignBit()) + if (Val->isSignBit()) { + // If wrapping is not allowed, then the addition must set the sign bit: + // X + (signbit) --> X | signbit + if (I.hasNoSignedWrap() || I.hasNoUnsignedWrap()) + return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(LHS, RHS); + + // If wrapping is allowed, then the addition flips the sign bit of LHS: + // X + (signbit) --> X ^ signbit return BinaryOperator::CreateXor(LHS, RHS); + } // Is this add the last step in a convoluted sext? Value *X; diff --git a/test/Transforms/InstCombine/add.ll b/test/Transforms/InstCombine/add.ll index c04953d1a41..73c786dcb26 100644 --- a/test/Transforms/InstCombine/add.ll +++ b/test/Transforms/InstCombine/add.ll @@ -267,24 +267,22 @@ define i32 @xor_sign_bit(i32 %x) { ret i32 %add } -; Lose no-wrap info by converting to xor? %x is known non-negative -; here, but not after converting to xor. +; No-wrap info allows converting the add to 'or'. define i8 @add_nsw_signbit(i8 %x) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @add_nsw_signbit( -; CHECK-NEXT: [[Y:%.*]] = xor i8 %x, -128 +; CHECK-NEXT: [[Y:%.*]] = or i8 %x, -128 ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i8 [[Y]] ; %y = add nsw i8 %x, -128 ret i8 %y } -; Lose no-wrap info by converting to xor? %x is known non-negative -; (x < 128 unsigned), but not after converting to xor. +; No-wrap info allows converting the add to 'or'. define i8 @add_nuw_signbit(i8 %x) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @add_nuw_signbit( -; CHECK-NEXT: [[Y:%.*]] = xor i8 %x, -128 +; CHECK-NEXT: [[Y:%.*]] = or i8 %x, -128 ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i8 [[Y]] ; %y = add nuw i8 %x, 128 diff --git a/test/Transforms/InstCombine/icmp-add.ll b/test/Transforms/InstCombine/icmp-add.ll index 7345621045d..efeb9d5bb45 100644 --- a/test/Transforms/InstCombine/icmp-add.ll +++ b/test/Transforms/InstCombine/icmp-add.ll @@ -223,24 +223,22 @@ define i1 @nsw_slt5_ov(i8 %a) { ret i1 %c } -; FIXME: InstCombine should not lose wrapping information by changing the add to xor. +; InstCombine should not thwart this opportunity to simplify completely. define i1 @slt_zero_add_nsw_signbit(i8 %x) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @slt_zero_add_nsw_signbit( -; CHECK-NEXT: [[Z:%.*]] = icmp sgt i8 %x, -1 -; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[Z]] +; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true ; %y = add nsw i8 %x, -128 %z = icmp slt i8 %y, 0 ret i1 %z } -; FIXME: InstCombine should not lose wrapping information by changing the add to xor. +; InstCombine should not thwart this opportunity to simplify completely. define i1 @slt_zero_add_nuw_signbit(i8 %x) { ; CHECK-LABEL: @slt_zero_add_nuw_signbit( -; CHECK-NEXT: [[Z:%.*]] = icmp sgt i8 %x, -1 -; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[Z]] +; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true ; %y = add nuw i8 %x, 128 %z = icmp slt i8 %y, 0