For example, ".byte 256" would previously assert() when emitting an object
file. Now it generates a diagnostic that the literal value is out of range.
rdar://9686950
llvm-svn: 134069
When the destination operand is the same as the first source register
operand for arithmetic instructions, the destination operand may be omitted.
For example, the following two instructions are equivalent:
and r1, #ff
and r1, r1, #ff
rdar://9672867
llvm-svn: 133973
Correctly parse the forms of the Thumb mov-immediate instruction:
1. 8-bit immediate 0-255.
2. 12-bit shifted-immediate.
The 16-bit immediate "movw" form is also legal with just a "mov" mnemonic,
but is not yet supported. More parser logic necessary there due to fixups.
llvm-svn: 133966
Add aliases for the vpush/vpop mnemonics to the VFP load/store multiple
writeback instructions w/ SP as the base pointer.
rdar://9683231
llvm-svn: 133932
When the destination operand is the same as the first source register
operand for arithmetic instructions, the destination operand may be omitted.
For example, the following two instructions are equivalent:
sub r2, r2, #6
sub r2, #6
rdar://9682597
llvm-svn: 133925
- Flip order of bitfields. This gets our output matching GAS.
- Handle case where the end of the prolog wasn't specified.
- If the resulting unwind info struct is less than 8 bytes, pad to 8 bytes.
Add a test for the latter two.
llvm-svn: 132188
Rework how the MCWin64EHUnwindInfo instances are stored. Fix issues with
chained unwind areas exposed by the test that were related to this.
The ChainedParent field had the wrong address, because when the chained unwind
info was added, the addresses shifted around. Now we store the pointers to the
structures, which are now allocated from the MC heap.
llvm-svn: 132106
them.
I had to add a special SwitchSectionNoChange method to MCStreamer just for
.seh_handlerdata. If this isn't OK, please let me know, and I'll find some
other way to fix .seh_handlerdata streaming.
llvm-svn: 132084
text section.
Assume the following bit of annotated assembly:
.section .data.rel.ro,"aw",%progbits
.align 2
.LAlpha:
.long startval(GOTOFF)
.text
.align 2
.type main,%function
.align 4
main: ;;; assume "main" starts at offset 0x20
0x0 push {r11, lr}
0x4 movw r0, :lower16:(.LAlpha-(.LBeta+8))
;;; ==> (.AddrOf(.LAlpha) - ((.AddrOf(.LBeta) - .AddrOf(".")) + 8)
;;; ==> (??? - ((16-4) + 8) = -20
0x8 movt r0, :upper16:(.LAlpha-(.LBeta+8))
;;; ==> (.AddrOf(.LAlpha) - ((.AddrOf(.LBeta) - .AddrOf(".")) + 8)
;;; ==> (??? - ((16-8) + 8) = -16
0xc ... blah
.LBeta:
0x10 add r0, pc, r0
0x14 ... blah
.LGamma:
0x18 add r1, pc, r1
Above snippet results in the following relocs in the .o file for the
first pair of movw/movt instructions
00000024 R_ARM_MOVW_PREL_NC .LAlpha
00000028 R_ARM_MOVT_PREL .LAlpha
And the encoded instructions in the .o file for main: must be
00000020 <main>:
20: e92d4800 push {fp, lr}
24: e30f0fec movw r0, #65516 ; 0xffec i.e. -20
28: e34f0ff0 movt r0, #65520 ; 0xfff0 i.e. -16
However, llc (prior to this commit) generates the following sequence
00000020 <main>:
20: e92d4800 push {fp, lr}
24: e30f0fec movw r0, #65516 ; 0xffec - i.e. -20
28: e34f0fff movt r0, #65535 ; 0xffff - i.e. -1
What has to happen in the ArmAsmBackend is that if the relocation is PC
relative, the 16 bits encoded as part of movw and movt must be both addends,
not addresses. It makes sense to encode addresses by right shifting the value
by 16, but the result is incorrect for PIC.
i.e., the right shift by 16 for movt is ONLY valid for the NON-PCRel case.
This change agrees with what GNU as does, and makes the PIC code run.
MC/ARM/elf-movt.s covers this case.
llvm-svn: 131674
("T is 1 if the target symbol S has type STT_FUNC and the
symbol addresses a Thumb instruction ;it is 0 otherwise."
from "ELF for the ARM Architecture" 4.7.1.2)
Patch by Koan-Sin Tan!
llvm-svn: 131406
